REVIEW 1 cited by
ParamANN: A Neural Network to Estimate Cosmological Parameters for $\Lambda$CDM Universe Using Hubble Measurements
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
In this article, we employ a machine learning (ML) approach for the estimations of four fundamental parameters, namely, the Hubble constant ($H_0$), matter ($\Omega_{0m}$), curvature ($\Omega_{0k}$) and vacuum ($\Omega_{0\Lambda}$) densities of non-flat $\Lambda$CDM model. We use $31$ Hubble parameter values measured by differential ages (DA) technique in the redshift interval $0.07 \leq z \leq 1.965$. We create an artificial neural network (ParamANN) and train it with simulated values of $H(z)$ using various sets of $H_0$, $\Omega_{0m}$, $\Omega_{0k}$, $\Omega_{0\Lambda}$ parameters chosen from different and sufficiently wide prior intervals. We use a correlated noise model in the analysis. We demonstrate accurate validation and prediction using ParamANN. ParamANN provides an excellent cross-check for the validity of the $\Lambda$CDM model. We obtain $H_0 = 68.14 \pm 3.96$ $\rm{kmMpc^{-1}s^{-1}}$, $\Omega_{0m} = 0.3029 \pm 0.1118$, $\Omega_{0k} = 0.0708 \pm 0.2527$ and $\Omega_{0\Lambda} = 0.6258 \pm 0.1689$ by using the trained network. These parameter values agree very well with the results of global CMB observations of the Planck collaboration. We compare the cosmological parameter values predicted by ParamANN with those obtained by the MCMC method. Both the results agree well with each other. This demonstrates that ParamANN is an alternative and complementary approach to the well-known Metropolis-Hastings algorithm for estimating the cosmological parameters by using Hubble measurements.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Reconstructing Cosmic History with Machine Learning: A Study Using CART, MLPR, and SVR
A benchmark of CART, MLPR, and SVR on simulated galaxy ages shows SVR has the lowest error and recovers the fiducial Omega_m and w values used to generate the data.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.