REVIEW 2 cited by
NP-Hardness of Tensor Network Contraction Ordering
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
We study the optimal order (or sequence) of contracting a tensor network with a minimal computational cost. We conclude 2 different versions of this optimal sequence: that minimize the operation number (OMS) and that minimize the time complexity (CMS). Existing results only shows that OMS is NP-hard, but no conclusion on CMS problem. In this work, we firstly reduce CMS to CMS-0, which is a sub-problem of CMS with no free indices. Then we prove that CMS is easier than OMS, both in general and in tree cases. Last but not least, we prove that CMS is still NP-hard. Based on our results, we have built up relationships of hardness of different tensor network contraction problems.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
TensorKit.jl: A Julia package for large-scale tensor computations, with a hint of category theory
TensorKit.jl is an open-source Julia package that handles tensor operations with abelian, non-abelian, and anyonic symmetries in one framework, with order-of-magnitude speedups from symmetry exploitation.
-
Integrating Neural Networks and Tensor Networks for Computing Free Energy
Tensor-network-based variational autoregressive networks (TNVAN) fix a small 'width set' of spins, contract the rest of the network exactly, and fit a neural variational distribution on the reduced system to estimate ...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.