REVIEW 1 cited by
Variable selection with FDR control for noisy data -- an application to screening metabolites that are associated with breast and colorectal cancer
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
The rapidly expanding field of metabolomics presents an invaluable resource for understanding the associations between metabolites and various diseases. However, the high dimensionality, presence of missing values, and measurement errors associated with metabolomics data can present challenges in developing reliable and reproducible methodologies for disease association studies. Therefore, there is a compelling need to develop robust statistical methods that can navigate these complexities to achieve reliable and reproducible disease association studies. In this paper, we focus on developing such a methodology with an emphasis on controlling the False Discovery Rate during the screening of mutual metabolomic signals for multiple disease outcomes. We illustrate the versatility and performance of this procedure in a variety of scenarios, dealing with missing data and measurement errors. As a specific application of this novel methodology, we target two of the most prevalent cancers among US women: breast cancer and colorectal cancer. By applying our method to the Wome's Health Initiative data, we successfully identify metabolites that are associated with either or both of these cancers, demonstrating the practical utility and potential of our method in identifying consistent risk factors and understanding shared mechanisms between diseases.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
A Short Note of Comparison between Convex and Non-convex Penalized Likelihood
Lasso is convex and fast but biased; SCAD and MCP reduce bias but are non-convex and slower, so method choice depends on context.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.