Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Deepfakes, Phrenology, Surveillance, and More! A Taxonomy of AI Privacy Risks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2310.07879 v2 pith:JUTZLYMK submitted 2023-10-11 cs.HC

classification cs.HC
keywords privacyriskstechnologiesaltercapabilitiesdataexacerbatedincidents
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Privacy is a key principle for developing ethical AI technologies, but how does including AI technologies in products and services change privacy risks? We constructed a taxonomy of AI privacy risks by analyzing 321 documented AI privacy incidents. We codified how the unique capabilities and requirements of AI technologies described in those incidents generated new privacy risks, exacerbated known ones, or otherwise did not meaningfully alter the risk. We present 12 high-level privacy risks that AI technologies either newly created (e.g., exposure risks from deepfake pornography) or exacerbated (e.g., surveillance risks from collecting training data). One upshot of our work is that incorporating AI technologies into a product can alter the privacy risks it entails. Yet, current approaches to privacy-preserving AI/ML (e.g., federated learning, differential privacy, checklists) only address a subset of the privacy risks arising from the capabilities and data requirements of AI.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Measuring, Modeling, and Helping People Account for Privacy Risks in Online Self-Disclosures with AI

    cs.HC 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    An interview study with 21 Reddit users found that an imperfect AI disclosure detector can still help people reflect on privacy risks, but needs context-aware explanations and personalization.

Pith tools