Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

The Data Lakehouse: Data Warehousing and More

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2310.08697 v1 pith:2ZRRCGVR submitted 2023-10-12 cs.DB

classification cs.DB
keywords datardbms-olapchallengeslakehousesystemsadditionalapproacharchitecture
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Relational Database Management Systems designed for Online Analytical Processing (RDBMS-OLAP) have been foundational to democratizing data and enabling analytical use cases such as business intelligence and reporting for many years. However, RDBMS-OLAP systems present some well-known challenges. They are primarily optimized only for relational workloads, lead to proliferation of data copies which can become unmanageable, and since the data is stored in proprietary formats, it can lead to vendor lock-in, restricting access to engines, tools, and capabilities beyond what the vendor offers. As the demand for data-driven decision making surges, the need for a more robust data architecture to address these challenges becomes ever more critical. Cloud data lakes have addressed some of the shortcomings of RDBMS-OLAP systems, but they present their own set of challenges. More recently, organizations have often followed a two-tier architectural approach to take advantage of both these platforms, leveraging both cloud data lakes and RDBMS-OLAP systems. However, this approach brings additional challenges, complexities, and overhead. This paper discusses how a data lakehouse, a new architectural approach, achieves the same benefits of an RDBMS-OLAP and cloud data lake combined, while also providing additional advantages. We take today's data warehousing and break it down into implementation independent components, capabilities, and practices. We then take these aspects and show how a lakehouse architecture satisfies them. Then, we go a step further and discuss what additional capabilities and benefits a lakehouse architecture provides over an RDBMS-OLAP.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Not Your Usual Type(s): Data contracts as types across languages and engines

    cs.DB 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Treating data contracts as type annotations enforced at three pipeline stages lets multi-language lakehouse DAGs fail fast on schema mismatches.

  2. Eudoxia: a FaaS scheduling simulator for the composable lakehouse

    cs.DB 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Eudoxia is a deterministic, open-source simulator for evaluating FaaS scheduling algorithms in composable lakehouses, with a TPC-H-based runtime validation on the Bauplan cloud platform.

Pith tools