Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Unbiased Estimation of Structured Prediction Error

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2310.10740 v1 pith:7CYPWYWZ submitted 2023-10-16 stat.ME

classification stat.ME
keywords errordataindependentestimatormethodsnormalsamplesunbiased
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

Many modern datasets, such as those in ecology and geology, are composed of samples with spatial structure and dependence. With such data violating the usual independent and identically distributed (IID) assumption in machine learning and classical statistics, it is unclear a priori how one should measure the performance and generalization of models. Several authors have empirically investigated cross-validation (CV) methods in this setting, reaching mixed conclusions. We provide a class of unbiased estimation methods for general quadratic errors, correlated Gaussian response, and arbitrary prediction function $g$, for a noise-elevated version of the error. Our approach generalizes the coupled bootstrap (CB) from the normal means problem to general normal data, allowing correlation both within and between the training and test sets. CB relies on creating bootstrap samples that are intelligently decoupled, in the sense of being statistically independent. Specifically, the key to CB lies in generating two independent "views" of our data and using them as stand-ins for the usual independent training and test samples. Beginning with Mallows' $C_p$, we generalize the estimator to develop our generalized $C_p$ estimators (GC). We show at under only a moment condition on $g$, this noise-elevated error estimate converges smoothly to the noiseless error estimate. We show that when Stein's unbiased risk estimator (SURE) applies, GC converges to SURE as in the normal means problem. Further, we use these same tools to analyze CV and provide some theoretical analysis to help understand when CV will provide good estimates of error. Simulations align with our theoretical results, demonstrating the effectiveness of GC and illustrating the behavior of CV methods. Lastly, we apply our estimator to a model selection task on geothermal data in Nevada.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. On the optimality of antithetic randomization for cross-validation

    math.ST 2026-08 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

    Antithetic randomization with correlation -1/(K-1) is necessary and sufficient to keep the randomization variance of cross-validation bounded in the small-bias limit, and the jointly normal antithetic scheme is minima...

Pith tools