Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Finite Sample Performance Analysis of MIMO Systems Identification

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2310.11790 v5 pith:GPM53YZT submitted 2023-10-18 eess.SY cs.SY

classification eess.SYcs.SY
keywords algorithmmimoidentificationsamplefinitefundamentalho-kalmanlimit
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper is concerned with the finite sample identification performance of an n dimensional discrete-time Multiple-Input Multiple-Output (MIMO) Linear Time-Invariant system, with p inputs and m outputs. We prove that the widely-used Ho-Kalman algorithm and Multivariable Output Error State Space (MOESP) algorithm are ill-conditioned for MIMO systems when n/m or n/p is large. Moreover, by analyzing the Cra\'mer-Rao bound, we derive a fundamental limit for identifying the real and stable (or marginally stable) poles of MIMO system and prove that the sample complexity for any unbiased pole estimation algorithm to reach a certain level of accuracy explodes superpolynomially with respect to n/(pm). Numerical results are provided to illustrate the ill-conditionedness of Ho-Kalman algorithm and MOESP algorithm as well as the fundamental limit on identification.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Finite Sample Analysis of Subspace Identification for Stochastic Systems

    eess.SY 2025-01 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    Subspace identification is claimed to have O(1/sqrt N) finite-sample matrix errors, O(N^{-1/(2n)}) pole errors, and a super-polynomial sample complexity in n/m; the last claim is not proven.

Pith tools