REVIEW 1 cited by
Torus knotted Reeb dynamics and the Calabi invariant
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
We establish the existence of a secondary Reeb orbit set with quantitative action and linking bounds for any contact form on the standard tight three-sphere admitting the standard transverse positive $T(p,q)$ torus knot as an elliptic Reeb orbit with a canonically determined rotation number. This can be interpreted through an ergodic lens for Reeb flows transverse to a surface of section. Our results also allow us to deduce an upper bound on the mean action of periodic orbits of naturally associated classes of area preserving diffeomorphisms of the associated Seifert surfaces of genus $(p-1)(q-1)/2$ in terms of the Calabi invariant, without the need for genericity or Hamiltonian hypotheses. Our proofs utilize knot filtered embedded contact homology, which was first introduced and computed by Hutchings for the standard transverse unknot in the irrational ellipsoids and further developed in our previous work. We continue our development of nontoric methods for embedded contact homology and establish the knot filtration on the embedded contact homology chain complex of the standard tight three-sphere with respect to positive $T(p,q)$ torus knots, where there are nonvanishing differentials. We also obtain obstructions to the existence of exact symplectic cobordisms between positive transverse torus knots.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Reeb orbits frequently intersecting a symplectic surface
For a nice contact form, some Reeb orbit intersects a given symplectic surface with frequency at least the surface area divided by the contact volume, without any genericity assumption.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.