Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Interpretable machine learning for finding intermediate-mass black holes

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2310.18560 v1 pith:TMCGIRBP submitted 2023-10-28 astro-ph.GA astro-ph.HEastro-ph.SR

classification astro-ph.GAastro-ph.HEastro-ph.SR
keywords datamodelblackrulexgboostbiasedcandidatesclassifier
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Definitive evidence that globular clusters (GCs) host intermediate-mass black holes (IMBHs) is elusive. Machine learning (ML) models trained on GC simulations can in principle predict IMBH host candidates based on observable features. This approach has two limitations: first, an accurate ML model is expected to be a black box due to complexity; second, despite our efforts to realistically simulate GCs, the simulation physics or initial conditions may fail to fully reflect reality. Therefore our training data may be biased, leading to a failure in generalization on observational data. Both the first issue -- explainability/interpretability -- and the second -- out of distribution generalization and fairness -- are active areas of research in ML. Here we employ techniques from these fields to address them: we use the anchors method to explain an XGBoost classifier; we also independently train a natively interpretable model using Certifiably Optimal RulE ListS (CORELS). The resulting model has a clear physical meaning, but loses some performance with respect to XGBoost. We evaluate potential candidates in real data based not only on classifier predictions but also on their similarity to the training data, measured by the likelihood of a kernel density estimation model. This measures the realism of our simulated data and mitigates the risk that our models may produce biased predictions by working in extrapolation. We apply our classifiers to real GCs, obtaining a predicted classification, a measure of the confidence of the prediction, an out-of-distribution flag, a local rule explaining the prediction of XGBoost and a global rule from CORELS.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools