REVIEW 1 cited by
We will DAG you
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
DAG-based protocols have been proposed as potential solutions to the latency and throughput limitations of traditional permissionless consensus protocols. However, their adoption has been hindered by security concerns and a lack of a solid foundation to guarantee improvements in both throughput and latency. In this paper, we present a construction that rigorously demonstrates how DAG-based protocols can achieve superior throughput and latency compared to chain-based consensus protocols, all while maintaining the same level of security guarantees.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Bullshark on Narwhal: Implementation-level Workflow Analysis of Round-based DAG Consensus in Theory and Practice
A descriptive, implementation-level workflow analysis of the existing Bullshark-on-Narwhal consensus protocol, based on the Sui codebase, with no new experiments or derivations.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.