Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Conditional Randomization Tests for Behavioral and Neural Time Series

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2311.03554 v1 pith:OI3MXS7A submitted 2023-11-06 stat.ME

classification stat.ME
keywords randomizationtestsconditionalallowbehavioralexperimentsnullresampled
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Randomization tests allow simple and unambiguous tests of null hypotheses, by comparing observed data to a null ensemble in which experimentally-controlled variables are randomly resampled. In behavioral and neuroscience experiments, however, the stimuli presented often depend on the subject's previous actions, so simple randomization tests are not possible. We describe how conditional randomization can be used to perform exact hypothesis tests in this situation, and illustrate it with two examples. We contrast conditional randomization with a related approach of tangent randomization, in which stimuli are resampled based only on events occurring in the past, which is not valid for all choices of test statistic. We discuss how to design experiments that allow conditional randomization tests to be used.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Testing the limits of past-adapted explanations by post-endpoint randomisation: anticipatory EEG as a worked case

    stat.ME 2026-08 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new randomized negative-control design, Level II-A, turns 'the past explains it' into a magnitude-qualified testable claim by randomizing a delay after endpoint commitment, validated on synthetic anticipatory EEG data.

Pith tools