REVIEW 1 cited by
Conditional Randomization Tests for Behavioral and Neural Time Series
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Randomization tests allow simple and unambiguous tests of null hypotheses, by comparing observed data to a null ensemble in which experimentally-controlled variables are randomly resampled. In behavioral and neuroscience experiments, however, the stimuli presented often depend on the subject's previous actions, so simple randomization tests are not possible. We describe how conditional randomization can be used to perform exact hypothesis tests in this situation, and illustrate it with two examples. We contrast conditional randomization with a related approach of tangent randomization, in which stimuli are resampled based only on events occurring in the past, which is not valid for all choices of test statistic. We discuss how to design experiments that allow conditional randomization tests to be used.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Testing the limits of past-adapted explanations by post-endpoint randomisation: anticipatory EEG as a worked case
A new randomized negative-control design, Level II-A, turns 'the past explains it' into a magnitude-qualified testable claim by randomizing a delay after endpoint commitment, validated on synthetic anticipatory EEG data.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.