REVIEW 1 cited by
Zero-Shot Duet Singing Voices Separation with Diffusion Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
In recent studies, diffusion models have shown promise as priors for solving audio inverse problems. These models allow us to sample from the posterior distribution of a target signal given an observed signal by manipulating the diffusion process. However, when separating audio sources of the same type, such as duet singing voices, the prior learned by the diffusion process may not be sufficient to maintain the consistency of the source identity in the separated audio. For example, the singer may change from one to another occasionally. Tackling this problem will be useful for separating sources in a choir, or a mixture of multiple instruments with similar timbre, without acquiring large amounts of paired data. In this paper, we examine this problem in the context of duet singing voices separation, and propose a method to enforce the coherency of singer identity by splitting the mixture into overlapping segments and performing posterior sampling in an auto-regressive manner, conditioning on the previous segment. We evaluate the proposed method on the MedleyVox dataset and show that the proposed method outperforms the naive posterior sampling baseline. Our source code and the pre-trained model are publicly available at https://github.com/iamycy/duet-svs-diffusion.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
ArrayDPS: Unsupervised Blind Speech Separation with a Diffusion Prior
Blind multi-channel speech separation can be solved with a single-speaker diffusion prior plus an estimated likelihood, without knowing array geometry or using paired training data.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.