REVIEW 1 cited by
Fast simulation of airfoil flow field via deep neural network
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) has become an indispensable tool in the optimization design, and evaluation of aircraft aerodynamics. However, solving the Navier-Stokes (NS) equations is a time-consuming, memory demanding and computationally expensive task. Artificial intelligence offers a promising avenue for flow field solving. In this work, we propose a novel deep learning framework for rapidly reconstructing airfoil flow fields. Channel attention and spatial attention modules are utilized in the downsampling stage of the UNet to enhance the feature learning capabilities of the deep learning model. Additionally, integrating the predicted flow field values generated by the deep learning model into the NS equation solver validates the credibility of the flow field prediction results. The NACA series airfoils were used to validate the prediction accuracy and generalization of the deep learning model. The experimental results represent the deep learning model achieving flow field prediction speeds three orders of magnitude faster than CFD solver. Furthermore, the CFD solver integrated with deep learning model demonstrates a threefold acceleration compared to CFD solver. By extensively mining historical flow field data, an efficient solution is derived for the rapid simulation of aircraft flow fields.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Acceleration of RANS Solver Convergence via Initialization with Wake Extension Models
A CNN that predicts downstream wake profiles from a single RANS solution can warm-start a RANS solver, cutting iterations by 26.3x and wall-clock time by 16.4x on a NACA0012 case.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.