pith. sign in

arxiv: 1710.01712 · v1 · pith:23MAI3Z5new · submitted 2017-10-04 · 💻 cs.CC

Note on "The Complexity of Counting Surjective Homomorphisms and Compactions"

classification 💻 cs.CC
keywords graphcomplexitycountinghomomorphismsloopsproblemprovesurjective
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Focke, Goldberg, and \v{Z}ivn\'y (arXiv 2017) prove a complexity dichotomy for the problem of counting surjective homomorphisms from a large input graph G without loops to a fixed graph H that may have loops. In this note, we give a short proof of a weaker result: Namely, we only prove the #P-hardness of the more general problem in which G may have loops. Our proof is an application of a powerful framework of Lov\'asz (2012), and it is analogous to proofs of Curticapean, Dell, and Marx (STOC 2017) who studied the "dual" problem in which the pattern graph G is small and the host graph H is the input. Independently, Chen (arXiv 2017) used Lov\'asz's framework to prove a complexity dichotomy for counting surjective homomorphisms to fixed finite structures.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.