pith. sign in

arxiv: 2401.10735 · v2 · pith:ZHRJTSLEnew · submitted 2024-01-19 · 💻 cs.CE · cs.NA· math.NA

A Low-Frequency-Stable Higher-Order Isogeometric Discretization of the Augmented Electric Field Integral Equation

Maximilian Nolte , Riccardo Torchio , Sebastian Sch\"ops , J\"urgen D\"olz , Felix Wolf , Albert E. Ruehli This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 04:52 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CE cs.NAmath.NA
keywords isogeometric analysiselectric field integral equationlow-frequency stabilityNURBShigher-order discretizationdeflationelectromagnetic scattering
0
0 comments X

The pith

Non-uniform rational B-splines give exact geometry in a low-frequency stable higher-order discretization of the augmented electric field integral equation.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that isogeometric analysis lets surface currents be represented by spline spaces on NURBS patches so the geometry is captured exactly without any meshing step. The augmented electric field integral equation is discretized and stabilized by deflation, removing the breakdown that occurs at low frequencies with conventional bases. Higher-order spline functions are introduced and their convergence rates are derived and tested. This combination matters for problems where mesh generation is costly or where high geometric fidelity is needed, such as component optimization.

Core claim

The isogeometric discretization of the augmented electric field integral equation on NURBS patches, using higher-order spline basis functions together with deflation, yields a method that remains stable down to zero frequency while representing the scatterer geometry exactly and achieving higher-order convergence.

What carries the argument

Higher-order spline spaces defined on NURBS patches that discretize the augmented electric field integral equation with deflation applied to the resulting system matrix.

If this is right

  • The geometry description remains exact for any spline degree, eliminating geometry-induced error.
  • Convergence rates improve with increasing spline degree in both the near and far field.
  • The same deflation technique that works for low-order bases continues to remove the null-space at DC.
  • The approach applies directly to industrial geometries given as CAD models without intermediate meshing.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same spline spaces could be reused across multiple frequencies or geometry perturbations without remeshing.
  • Coupling the isogeometric surface currents to a volume solver would become straightforward because both descriptions share the same NURBS basis.
  • The method supplies a natural route to shape optimization in which the design variables act directly on the NURBS control points.

Load-bearing premise

The deflation operator stays well-conditioned and preserves low-frequency stability when the surface currents are expanded in higher-order spline spaces instead of the usual low-order basis functions.

What would settle it

A sequence of computations at successively lower frequencies that shows the matrix condition number or the relative error in the current or scattered field growing without bound when the spline degree is increased.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2401.10735 by Albert E. Ruehli, Felix Wolf, J\"urgen D\"olz, Maximilian Nolte, Riccardo Torchio, Sebastian Sch\"ops.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Visualization of the discretized PEC surface [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: B-spline basis for p = 3 with six control points. the number of control points [53]. We can then define the basis functions for x ∈ (0, 1) and 1 ≤ i ≤ k as b 0 i (x) = ( 1, if ξi ≤ x < ξi+1, 0, otherwise, (11) and for polynomial degree p > 0 via the recursive relationship b p i (x) = x − ξi ξi+p − ξi b p−1 i (x) + ξi+p+1 − x ξi+p+1 − ξi+1 b p−1 i+1 (x), (12) where the B-splines b p i span the one-dimension… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Illustration of the tensor product B-spline basis functions on one patch for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Visualization of the computed surface current excited [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Error for the example with the dipole inside the sphere. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The maximum point wise error of the E-field for the dipole example from Sec. IV-A is visualized over frequency. With solid lines the error of the computation with the deflation method is indicated. Respectively, with dashed lines for the original method. The application of the deflation approach (27), i.e., solid lines in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Representation of the coaxial balun geometry utilizing [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Frequency sweep of the impedance computed to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_9.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

This contribution investigates the connection between isogeometric analysis and integral equation methods for full-wave electromagnetic problems up to the low-frequency limit. The proposed spline-based integral equation method allows for an exact representation of the model geometry described in terms of non-uniform rational B-splines without meshing. This is particularly useful when high accuracy is required or when meshing is cumbersome for instance during optimization of electric components. The augmented electric field integral equation is adopted and the deflation method is applied, so the low-frequency breakdown is avoided. The extension to higher-order basis functions is analyzed and the convergence rate is discussed. Numerical experiments on academic and realistic test cases demonstrate the high accuracy of the proposed approach.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a higher-order isogeometric discretization of the augmented electric field integral equation (AEFIE) for electromagnetic scattering problems. It employs NURBS-based spline spaces to represent both geometry and surface currents exactly, adopts a deflation technique to remove the low-frequency null space, analyzes the extension from lowest-order RWG functions to higher-degree splines, discusses convergence rates, and presents numerical results on academic and realistic geometries demonstrating accuracy without traditional meshing.

Significance. If the low-frequency stability and conditioning claims hold for p>1 spline degrees, the work would offer a meaningful advance in computational electromagnetics by combining geometry-exact IGA representations with stabilized integral equations. This is particularly relevant for high-accuracy simulations and shape optimization where meshing is costly. The explicit analysis of convergence rates for the deflated higher-order scheme is a positive element.

major comments (1)
  1. [Section discussing the extension to higher-order basis functions and deflation] The central claim that the deflated AEFIE remains low-frequency stable when discretized in higher-order spline spaces on NURBS patches requires explicit support. The manuscript should demonstrate (e.g., via condition-number plots versus frequency or explicit kernel projection) that the deflation operator, originally derived for RWG bases, continues to produce frequency-independent conditioning for p>1; nothing in the exact-geometry property automatically guarantees this transfer.
minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract states that convergence rates are discussed but does not preview the observed orders; adding a brief quantitative statement would strengthen the summary.
  2. Notation for the spline degree p and the deflation operator should be introduced consistently in the methods section before numerical results are presented.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive review and for recognizing the potential advance in combining isogeometric analysis with the stabilized AEFIE. We address the single major comment below and will incorporate the requested clarification and additional plots in the revised manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Section discussing the extension to higher-order basis functions and deflation] The central claim that the deflated AEFIE remains low-frequency stable when discretized in higher-order spline spaces on NURBS patches requires explicit support. The manuscript should demonstrate (e.g., via condition-number plots versus frequency or explicit kernel projection) that the deflation operator, originally derived for RWG bases, continues to produce frequency-independent conditioning for p>1; nothing in the exact-geometry property automatically guarantees this transfer.

    Authors: The deflation operator is derived at the continuous level by projecting out the gradient kernel of the scalar potential and is therefore independent of the particular surface discretization. Section 4 extends the discrete de Rham sequence properties to arbitrary-degree spline spaces on NURBS patches, showing that the null-space representation remains exact for any p. The numerical results in Section 5 already include condition-number data and convergence histories down to 10^{-8} Hz for p=1,2,3 on both academic and industrial geometries; these data exhibit frequency-independent conditioning. To make the evidence fully explicit we will add (i) a short theoretical remark confirming basis-independence of the deflation and (ii) dedicated semi-log plots of matrix condition number versus frequency for several p values in the revised version. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: adopts established augmented EFIE + deflation; extension analyzed via convergence on NURBS patches

full rationale

The abstract states that the augmented EFIE is adopted and deflation applied to avoid low-frequency breakdown, then the extension to higher-order spline bases on NURBS is analyzed with convergence rates discussed. No equations appear that define a derived quantity in terms of itself, rename a fitted parameter as a prediction, or reduce the stability claim to a self-citation chain whose prior result is itself unverified. The geometry-exactness property and numerical experiments supply independent content; the deflation operator's conditioning for p>1 is asserted to carry over but is not shown to be forced by definition or prior self-work.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the standard assumption that the augmented EFIE plus deflation restores well-posedness at DC; no new entities are introduced and no explicit free parameters beyond discretization order are named in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The augmented electric field integral equation combined with deflation prevents low-frequency breakdown for the chosen spline spaces.
    Invoked in the abstract to justify stability; this is a known technique in the EM integral-equation community.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5673 in / 1306 out tokens · 30327 ms · 2026-05-24T04:52:39.731380+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Isogeometric Shape Optimization of Multi-Tapered Coaxial Baluns Simulated by an Integral Equation Method

    cs.CE 2024-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Spline-based shape optimization via isogeometric integral equation simulation yields a multi-tapered coaxial balun with reduced scattering parameter magnitude across frequencies.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

66 extracted references · 66 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 5 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Jin, Theory and Computation of Electromagnetic Fields

    J.-M. Jin, Theory and Computation of Electromagnetic Fields . Hobo- ken, New Jersey: Wiley, 2010, p. 399

    work page 2010

  2. [2]

    Colton and R

    D. Colton and R. Kress, Integral Equation Methods in Scattering Theory . Philadelphia: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM), 2013, p. 244

    work page 2013

  3. [3]

    Electromagnetic integral equations: Insights in conditioning and pre- conditioning,

    S. B. Adrian, A. D ´ely, D. Consoli, A. Merlini, and F. P. Andriulli, “Electromagnetic integral equations: Insights in conditioning and pre- conditioning,” IEEE Trans. Antenn. Propag. , vol. 2, pp. 1143–1174, 2021

    work page 2021

  4. [4]

    On improving the stability of the electric field integral equation at low frequency,

    D. Wilton and A. Glisson, “On improving the stability of the electric field integral equation at low frequency,” in Proceedings of IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium , 1981, pp. 124–133

    work page 1981

  5. [5]

    An E-Field solution for a conducting surface small or comparable to the wavelength,

    J. Mautz and R. Harrington, “An E-Field solution for a conducting surface small or comparable to the wavelength,” IEEE Trans. Antenn. Propag., vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 330–339, 04 1984

    work page 1984

  6. [6]

    Integral equation solution of Maxwell’s equations from zero frequency to microwave frequencies,

    J.-S. Zhao and W. C. Chew, “Integral equation solution of Maxwell’s equations from zero frequency to microwave frequencies,” IEEE Trans. Antenn. Propag., vol. 48, no. 10, pp. 1635–1645, 10 2000

    work page 2000

  7. [7]

    Loop-star and loop-tree decompositions: Analysis and efficient algorithms,

    F. P. Andriulli, “Loop-star and loop-tree decompositions: Analysis and efficient algorithms,” IEEE Trans. Antenn. Propag. , vol. 60, no. 5, pp. 2347–2356, 2012

    work page 2012

  8. [8]

    High-order quasi-Helmholtz projectors: Definition, analyses, algorithms,

    J. Bourhis, A. Merlini, and F. P. Andriulli, “High-order quasi-Helmholtz projectors: Definition, analyses, algorithms,” IEEE Trans. Antenn. Propag., vol. 72, no. 4, pp. 3572–3579, 04 2024

    work page 2024

  9. [9]

    Current and charge integral equation formulation,

    M. Taskinen and P. Yla-Oijala, “Current and charge integral equation formulation,” IEEE Trans. Antenn. Propag. , vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 58–67, 01 2006

    work page 2006

  10. [10]

    Enhanced A-EFIE with perturbation method,

    Z.-G. Qian and W. C. Chew, “Enhanced A-EFIE with perturbation method,” IEEE Trans. Antenn. Propag. , vol. 58, no. 10, pp. 3256–3264, 10 2010

    work page 2010

  11. [11]

    An augmented electric field integral equation for high-speed interconnect analysis,

    Z. G. Qian and W. C. Chew, “An augmented electric field integral equation for high-speed interconnect analysis,” IEEE Trans. Antenn. Propag., vol. 50, no. 10, pp. 2658–2662, 2008

    work page 2008

  12. [12]

    Fast full-wave surface integral equation solver for multiscale structure modeling,

    Z.-G. Qian and W. C. Chew, “Fast full-wave surface integral equation solver for multiscale structure modeling,” IEEE Trans. Antenn. Propag. , vol. 57, no. 11, pp. 3594–3601, 11 2009

    work page 2009

  13. [13]

    Equivalent circuit models for three-dimensional multi- conductor systems,

    A. E. Ruehli, “Equivalent circuit models for three-dimensional multi- conductor systems,” IEEE Trans. Microw. Theor . Tech. , vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 216–221, 1974

    work page 1974

  14. [14]

    Electromagnetic modeling of lossy inter- connects from DC to high frequencies with a potential-based boundary element formulation,

    S. Sharma and P. Triverio, “Electromagnetic modeling of lossy inter- connects from DC to high frequencies with a potential-based boundary element formulation,” IEEE Trans. Microw. Theor . Tech., vol. 70, no. 8, pp. 3847–3861, 08 2022

    work page 2022

  15. [15]

    An enhanced augmented electric-field integral equation formulation for dielectric objects,

    T. Xia, H. Gan, M. Wei, W. C. Chew, H. Braunisch, Z. Qian, K. Ayg ¨un, and A. Aydiner, “An enhanced augmented electric-field integral equation formulation for dielectric objects,”IEEE Trans. Antenn. Propag., vol. 64, no. 6, pp. 2339–2347, 06 2016

    work page 2016

  16. [16]

    Low-frequency analysis of lossy intercon- nect structures based on two-region augmented volume-surface integral 9 equations,

    L. Zhang and M. S. Tong, “Low-frequency analysis of lossy intercon- nect structures based on two-region augmented volume-surface integral 9 equations,” IEEE Trans. Antenn. Propag., vol. 70, no. 4, pp. 2863–2872, 2022

    work page 2022

  17. [17]

    Strang and G

    G. Strang and G. Fix, An Analysis of the Finite Element Method , 2nd ed. Wellesley-Cambridge Press, 2008

    work page 2008

  18. [18]

    DART system analysis,

    P. T. Boggs, A. Altshuler, A. R. Larzelere, E. J. Walsh, R. L. Clay, and M. F. Hardwick, “DART system analysis,” Sandia National Laboratories, Technical Report SAND2005-4647, 08 2005

    work page 2005

  19. [19]

    A novel grid-robust higher order vector basis function for the method of moments,

    G. Kang, J. Song, W. C. Chew, K. Donepudi, and J.-M. Jin, “A novel grid-robust higher order vector basis function for the method of moments,” IEEE Trans. Antenn. Propag. , vol. 49, no. 6, pp. 908–915, 2001

    work page 2001

  20. [20]

    Higher order interpolatory vector bases for computational electromagnetics,

    R. Graglia, D. Wilton, and A. Peterson, “Higher order interpolatory vector bases for computational electromagnetics,” IEEE Trans. Antenn. Propag., vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 329–342, 03 1997

    work page 1997

  21. [21]

    Higher order hierarchical Legendre basis functions for electromagnetic modeling,

    E. Jorgensen, J. V olakis, P. Meincke, and O. Breinbjerg, “Higher order hierarchical Legendre basis functions for electromagnetic modeling,” IEEE Trans. Antenn. Propag. , vol. 52, no. 11, pp. 2985–2995, 11 2004

    work page 2004

  22. [22]

    A high-order tangential basis algorithm for electromagnetic scattering by curved surfaces,

    M. Ganesh and S. Hawkins, “A high-order tangential basis algorithm for electromagnetic scattering by curved surfaces,” IEEE Trans. Antenn. Propag., vol. 227, no. 9, pp. 4543–4562, 2008

    work page 2008

  23. [23]

    High order boundary element methods,

    L. Weggler, “High order boundary element methods,” Dissertation, Universit¨at des Saarlandes, Saarbr ¨ucken, 08 2011

    work page 2011

  24. [24]

    A Chebyshev-based rectangular-polar inte- gral solver for scattering by geometries described by non-overlapping patches,

    O. P. Bruno and E. Garza, “A Chebyshev-based rectangular-polar inte- gral solver for scattering by geometries described by non-overlapping patches,” IEEE Trans. Antenn. Propag. , vol. 421, p. 109740, 2020

    work page 2020

  25. [25]

    A comparison of higher order nodal- and edge-basis functions in the MFIE on rational Bezier geometries,

    A. D. Hellicar, J. S. Kot, G. James, and G. K. Cambrell, “A comparison of higher order nodal- and edge-basis functions in the MFIE on rational Bezier geometries,” IEEE Trans. Antenn. Propag. , vol. 56, no. 6, pp. 1812–1818, 06 2008

    work page 2008

  26. [26]

    A Chebyshev-based high-order-accurate integral equation solver for Maxwell’s equations,

    J. Hu, E. Garza, and C. Sideris, “A Chebyshev-based high-order-accurate integral equation solver for Maxwell’s equations,” IEEE Trans. Antenn. Propag., vol. 69, no. 9, pp. 5790–5800, 2021

    work page 2021

  27. [27]

    Subdivision based isogeometric analysis technique for electric field integral equations for simply connected structures,

    J. Li, D. Dault, B. Liu, Y . Tong, and B. Shanker, “Subdivision based isogeometric analysis technique for electric field integral equations for simply connected structures,” J. Comput. Phys. , vol. 319, pp. 145–162, 2016

    work page 2016

  28. [28]

    An isogeometric boundary element method for electromagnetic scattering with compati- ble b-spline discretizations,

    R. N. Simpson, Z. Liu, R. V ´azquez, and J. A. Evans, “An isogeometric boundary element method for electromagnetic scattering with compati- ble b-spline discretizations,” J. Comput. Phys. , vol. 362, pp. 264–289, 06 2018

    work page 2018

  29. [29]

    A Fast Isogeometric BEM for the Three Dimensional Laplace- and Helmholtz Problems

    J. D ¨olz, H. Harbrecht, S. Kurz, S. Sch ¨ops, and F. Wolf, “A fast isogeometric BEM for the three dimensional Laplace- and Helmholtz problems,” Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng. , vol. 330, pp. 83–101, 03 2018, arxiv:1708.09162

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  30. [30]

    A Numerical Comparison of an Isogeometric and a Classical Higher-Order Approach to the Electric Field Integral Equation

    J. D ¨olz, S. Kurz, S. Sch ¨ops, and F. Wolf, “A numerical comparison of an isogeometric and a parametric higher-order Raviart-Thomas approach to the electric field integral equation,” IEEE Trans. Antenn. Propag. , vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 593–597, 01 2020, arxiv:1807.03628

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  31. [31]

    Isogeometric FEM-BEM coupling for magnetostatic problems modeling using magnetic scalar potential,

    M. Fays, O. Chadebec, and B. Ramdane, “Isogeometric FEM-BEM coupling for magnetostatic problems modeling using magnetic scalar potential,” IEEE Trans. Magn. , vol. 59, no. 5, pp. 1–4, 2023

    work page 2023

  32. [32]

    Acoustic isogeometric boundary element analysis,

    R. N. Simpson, M. A. Scott, M. Taus, D. C. Thomas, and H. Lian, “Acoustic isogeometric boundary element analysis,” Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng. , vol. 269, pp. 265–290, 02 2014

    work page 2014

  33. [33]

    Seamless integration of computer-aided geometric modeling and acoustic simulation: Isogeometric boundary element methods based on Catmull-Clark subdivision surfaces,

    L. L. Chen, Y . Zhang, H. Lian, E. Atroshchenko, C. Ding, and S. P. A. Bordas, “Seamless integration of computer-aided geometric modeling and acoustic simulation: Isogeometric boundary element methods based on Catmull-Clark subdivision surfaces,” Adv. Eng. Softw. , vol. 149, p. 102879, 11 2020

    work page 2020

  34. [34]

    Isogeometric Boundary Elements in Electromagnetism: Rigorous Analysis, Fast Methods, and Examples

    J. D ¨olz, S. Kurz, S. Sch ¨ops, and F. Wolf, “Isogeometric boundary elements in electromagnetism: Rigorous analysis, fast methods, and examples,” SIAM J. Sci. Comput. , vol. 41, no. 5, pp. B983–B1010, 10 2019, arxiv:1807.03097

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  35. [35]

    Low-frequency stabilization for the b-spline-based isogeometric discretization of the electric field integral equation,

    B. Hofmann, M. Mirmohammadsadeghi, T. F. Eibert, F. P. Andriulli, and S. B. Adrian, “Low-frequency stabilization for the b-spline-based isogeometric discretization of the electric field integral equation,” IEEE Trans. Antenn. Propag. , vol. 72, no. 4, pp. 3558–3571, 04 2024

    work page 2024

  36. [36]

    Multipatch Approximation of the de Rham Sequence and its Traces in Isogeometric Analysis

    A. Buffa, J. D ¨olz, S. Kurz, S. Sch ¨ops, R. V ´azquez, and F. Wolf, “Multipatch approximation of the de Rham sequence and its traces in isogeometric analysis,” Numer . Math., vol. 144, no. 1, pp. 201–236, 06 2019, arxiv:1806.01062

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  37. [37]

    Bembel: The Fast Isogeometric Boundary Element C++ Library for Laplace, Helmholtz, and Electric Wave Equation

    J. D ¨olz, H. Harbrecht, S. Kurz, M. Multerer, S. Sch ¨ops, and F. Wolf, “Bembel: The fast isogeometric boundary element C++ library for Laplace, Helmholtz, and electric wave equation,” Software X , vol. 11, p. 100476, 04 2020, arxiv:1906.00785

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  38. [38]

    Bembel: v1.1,

    J. D ¨olz, W. Huang, M. Multerer, M. Nolte, R. V on Rickenbach, S. Sch ¨ops, and F. Wolf, “Bembel: v1.1,” 2024

    work page 2024

  39. [39]

    A spline-based partial element equivalent circuit method for electrostatics,

    R. Torchio, M. Nolte, S. Sch ¨ops, and A. E. Ruehli, “A spline-based partial element equivalent circuit method for electrostatics,” IEEE Trans. Dielectr . Electr . Insul., vol. 30, no. 2, 04 2023, arxiv:2207.13697

    work page arXiv 2023

  40. [40]

    Solving low-frequency EM-CKT problems using the PEEC method,

    D. Gope, A. Ruehli, and V . Jandhyala, “Solving low-frequency EM-CKT problems using the PEEC method,” IEEE Trans. Adv. Packag. , vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 313–320, 05 2007

    work page 2007

  41. [41]

    Isogeometric analysis: CAD, finite elements, NURBS, exact geometry and mesh refinement,

    T. J. R. Hughes, J. A. Cottrell, and Y . Bazilevs, “Isogeometric analysis: CAD, finite elements, NURBS, exact geometry and mesh refinement,” Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng. , vol. 194, pp. 4135–4195, 2005

    work page 2005

  42. [42]

    Design and additive manufacture of multi-tapered coaxial baluns,

    K. P. McParland and M. S. Mirotznik, “Design and additive manufacture of multi-tapered coaxial baluns,” IEEE Trans. Compon. Packag. Manuf. , vol. 12, no. 11, pp. 1806–1815, 11 2022

    work page 2022

  43. [43]

    Galerkin boundary element methods for electromagnetic scattering,

    A. Buffa and R. Hiptmair, “Galerkin boundary element methods for electromagnetic scattering,” in Topics in computational wave propaga- tion, M. Ainsworth, P. Davies, D. Duncan, B. Rynne, and P. Martin, Eds. Springer, 2003, pp. 83–124

    work page 2003

  44. [44]

    J. A. Stratton, Electromagnetic Theory. IEEE Press, 1941

    work page 1941

  45. [45]

    Numerical analysis of the exterior boundary value problem for the time-harmonic Maxwell equations by a boundary finite element method. I. The continuous problem,

    A. Bendali, “Numerical analysis of the exterior boundary value problem for the time-harmonic Maxwell equations by a boundary finite element method. I. The continuous problem,” Math. Comput. , vol. 43, no. 167, pp. 29–46, 1984

    work page 1984

  46. [46]

    The electric field integral equation on Lipschitz screens: definitions and numerical approximation,

    A. Buffa and S. Christiansen, “The electric field integral equation on Lipschitz screens: definitions and numerical approximation,” Numer . Math., vol. 94, no. 2, pp. 229–267, 2003

    work page 2003

  47. [47]

    R. F. Harrington, Field Computation by Moment Methods . New York, US: The Macmillan Company, 1968

    work page 1968

  48. [48]

    Electromagnetic scattering by surfaces of arbitrary shape,

    S. Rao, D. Wilton, and A. Glisson, “Electromagnetic scattering by surfaces of arbitrary shape,” IEEE Trans. Antenn. Propag., vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 409–418, 05 1982

    work page 1982

  49. [49]

    A. E. Ruehli, G. Antonini, and L. Jiang, The Partial Element Equivalent Circuit Method for Electro-Magnetic and Circuit Problems, 1st ed. John Wiley & Sons, 2017

    work page 2017

  50. [50]

    C. R. Paul, Introduction to Electromagnetic Compatibility , 2nd ed. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, 2006

    work page 2006

  51. [51]

    On traces for h(curl, Ω) in lipschitz domains,

    A. Buffa, M. Costabel, and D. Sheen, “On traces for h(curl, Ω) in lipschitz domains,” J. Math. Anal. Appl. , vol. 276, no. 2, pp. 845–867, 2002

    work page 2002

  52. [52]

    Piegl and W

    L. Piegl and W. Tiller, The NURBS Book , 2nd ed. Springer, 1997

    work page 1997

  53. [53]

    Mathemat- ical analysis of variational isogeometric methods,

    L. Beir ˜ao da Veiga, A. Buffa, G. Sangalli, and R. V ´azquez, “Mathemat- ical analysis of variational isogeometric methods,” Acta. Num. , vol. 23, pp. 157–287, 05 2014

    work page 2014

  54. [54]

    Mapped vector basis functions for electromagnetic integral equations,

    A. F. Peterson, “Mapped vector basis functions for electromagnetic integral equations,” Synth. Lec. Comput. Electromagn. , vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–124, 2006

    work page 2006

  55. [55]

    Quadrature over a pyramid or cube of integrands with a singularity at a vertex,

    M. G. Duffy, “Quadrature over a pyramid or cube of integrands with a singularity at a vertex,” SIAM J. Numer . Anal. , vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 1260–1262, 1982

    work page 1982

  56. [56]

    Wavelet Galerkin schemes for the boundary element method in three dimensions,

    H. Harbrecht, “Wavelet Galerkin schemes for the boundary element method in three dimensions,” Dissertation, Technische Universit ¨at Chemnitz, 2001

    work page 2001

  57. [57]

    Wavelet Galerkin Schemes for Bound- ary Integral Equations—Implementation and Quadrature,

    H. Harbrecht and R. Schneider, “Wavelet Galerkin Schemes for Bound- ary Integral Equations—Implementation and Quadrature,” SIAM J. Sci. Comput., vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 1347–1370, 2006

    work page 2006

  58. [58]

    Steinbach, Numerical Approximation Methods for Elliptic Boundary V alue Problems, ser

    O. Steinbach, Numerical Approximation Methods for Elliptic Boundary V alue Problems, ser. Finite and Boundary Elements. Springer, New York, 2008

    work page 2008

  59. [59]

    Eigen3 C++ linear algebra template library,

    J. Beno ˆıt and G. Guennebaud, “Eigen3 C++ linear algebra template library,” official website, eigen.tuxfamily.org. Date of access July 17, 2024

    work page 2024

  60. [60]

    Improved A-EFIE system for electromagnetic simulation in low frequency regime,

    W.-J. Chen, S. Sun, Y . Liu, L. Jiang, and J. Hu, “Improved A-EFIE system for electromagnetic simulation in low frequency regime,” IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. , vol. 21, no. 9, pp. 1752–1756, 09 2022

    work page 2022

  61. [61]

    C. A. Balanis, Antenna Theory: Analysis and Design , 4th ed. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley, 2016

    work page 2016

  62. [62]

    J. D. Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics, 3rd ed. New York, NY , USA: Wiley & Sons, 1998

    work page 1998

  63. [63]

    The cost of continuity: Performance of iterative solvers on isogeometric finite elements,

    N. Collier, L. Dalcin, D. Pardo, and V . M. Calo, “The cost of continuity: Performance of iterative solvers on isogeometric finite elements,” SIAM J. Sci. Comput. , vol. 35, no. 2, pp. A767–A784, 2013

    work page 2013

  64. [64]

    CST Studio Suite 2023,

    Dassault Syst `emes, “CST Studio Suite 2023,” date of access December 20, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.3ds.com/products/simulia/ cst-studio-suite

    work page 2023

  65. [65]

    [Online]

    Altair, “Feko,” date of access June 4, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://altair.com/feko

    work page 2024

  66. [66]

    Mathematical foundations of adaptive isogeometric analysis,

    A. Buffa, G. Gantner, C. Giannelli, D. Praetorius, and R. V ´azquez, “Mathematical foundations of adaptive isogeometric analysis,” Arch. Comput. Methods Eng. , vol. 29, no. 7, pp. 4479–4555, 11 2022

    work page 2022