Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

It's About Time: Incorporating Temporality in Retrieval Augmented Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2401.13222 v2 pith:P2H5N2O6 submitted 2024-01-24 cs.IR

classification cs.IR
keywords informationlanguageaugmentedbeendocumentmodelmodelsralm
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The web serves as a global repository of knowledge, used by billions of people to search for information. Ensuring that users receive the most relevant and up-to-date information, especially in the presence of multiple versions of web content from different time points remains a critical challenge for information retrieval. This challenge has recently been compounded by the increased use of question answering tools trained on Wikipedia or web content and powered by large language models (LLMs) which have been found to make up information (or hallucinate), and in addition have been shown to struggle with the temporal dimensions of information. Even Retriever Augmented Language Models (RALMs) which incorporate a document database to reduce LLM hallucination are unable to handle temporal queries correctly. This leads to instances where RALMs respond to queries such as "Who won the Wimbledon Championship?", by retrieving document passages related to Wimbledon but without the ability to differentiate between them based on how recent they are. In this paper, we propose and evaluate, TempRALM, a temporally-aware Retriever Augmented Language Model (RALM) with few-shot learning extensions, which takes into account both semantically and temporally relevant documents relative to a given query, rather than relying on semantic similarity alone. We show that our approach results in up to 74% improvement in performance over the baseline RALM model, without requiring model pre-training, recalculating or replacing the RALM document index, or adding other computationally intensive elements.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Temporal Information Retrieval via Time-Specifier Model Merging

    cs.IR 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    TSM trains one retriever per time specifier and merges them by parameter averaging, improving temporal retrieval while maintaining non-temporal retrieval.

  2. Reading Between the Timelines: RAG for Answering Diachronic Questions

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    TA-RAG uses LLM-extracted time intervals, time-filtered retrieval with averaged temporal query embeddings, and chronologically ordered context to beat standard RAG by 13-27 points on the new ADQAB benchmark of 525 mul...

  3. Freshness and the Limits of Heuristic Trend Detection in Temporal RAG

    cs.LG 2025-09 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

    A half-life recency prior appears to improve freshness in RAG, but the paper's abstract and body conflict, and the topic-evolution failure is misattributed to the clusterer.

Pith tools