Pith. sign in

Paper Citation Record · LEDGER

A Linguistic Comparison between Human and ChatGPT-Generated Conversations

As of 8 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 0 of 0 outbound references and 3 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2401.16587.

A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.

pith.paper-citation-record.v1
2401.16587 v3

Coverage vector

measured 0 of 0 reference resolution

Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.

Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links

measured 3 of 3 standing notices

One-hop event checks from named stored sources.

Source: scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache, observed 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00

measured 3 of 3 inbound itemization

Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.

Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links, observed 2026-08-07T11:50:14.661474Z

measured 0 of 1 external citation measurements

A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.

Source: arxiv_reference, observed 2026-05-11T21:01:11.899183Z

Reference resolution

0 of 0 outbound references displayed

  • verified exact0
  • verified fuzzy0
  • unresolved0
  • parse uncertain0
  • malformed identifier0
  • metadata mismatch0

External citation measurements

No source-named external measurement is stored.

Outbound references

No outbound reference observations are available for this paper version.

Pith citing papers

Observation b973313c-3ec7-4f65-b7c0-1fd2c786bf9d · inbound

Comparing LLM-generated and human-authored news text using formal syntactic theory cites this paper.

Comparing LLM-generated and human-authored news text using formal syntactic theory A Linguistic Comparison between Human and ChatGPT-Generated Conversations

Reference 35

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-07T11:50:14.661474Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-07T11:50:14.661474Z digest=sha256:d24bc0b2bcb7e03e8ec4700f6bca38df4f4e1bec3442b9ca5e36f62995f55361

Observation 7934dcd1-aa96-40eb-bcdd-c5b144397c49 · inbound

Interpretable Stylistic Variation in Human and LLM Writing Across Genres, Models, and Decoding Strategies cites this paper.

Interpretable Stylistic Variation in Human and LLM Writing Across Genres, Models, and Decoding Strategies A Linguistic Comparison between Human and ChatGPT-Generated Conversations

Reference 5

Resolution
verified exact
arxiv_id, observed 2026-05-10T12:50:24.938059Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-05-10T12:48:43.169606Z digest=sha256:cca16e208a516ec780a6a0eb63fb60bd3a1947059848c35510633ced1afaef62

Observation 111ecb76-5a76-4640-8d62-31af3eb95434 · inbound

Can Humans Detect AI? Mining Textual Signals of AI-Assisted Writing Under Varying Scrutiny Conditions cites this paper.

Can Humans Detect AI? Mining Textual Signals of AI-Assisted Writing Under Varying Scrutiny Conditions A Linguistic Comparison between Human and ChatGPT-Generated Conversations

Reference 18

Resolution
verified exact
arxiv_id, observed 2026-05-11T21:01:11.907163Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-05-08T07:25:29.722484Z digest=sha256:2e1fe458d01c332259195f375e40804367fdc76414752dc50297ad805ae826c1