REVIEW 1 cited by
Nonlinear feedback of the electrostatic instability on the blazar-induced pair beam and GeV cascade
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
Relativistic pair beams produced in the cosmic voids by TeV gamma rays from blazars are expected to produce a detectable GeV-scale cascade that is missing in the observations. The suppression of this secondary cascade implies either the deflection of the pair beam by intergalactic magnetic fields or, alternatively, an energy loss of the beam due to the beam-plasma instability. Here, we study how the beam-plasma instability feeds back on the beam, using a realistic two-dimensional beam distribution. We find that the instability broadens the beam opening angles significantly without any significant energy loss, thus confirming a recent feedback study on a simplified one-dimensional beam distribution. However, narrowing diffusion feedback of the beam particles with Lorentz factors less than $10^6$ might become relevant even though initially it is negligible. Finally, when considering the continuous creation of TeV pairs, we find that the beam distribution and the wave spectrum reach a new quasi-steady state, in which the scattering of beam particles persists and the beam opening angle may increase by a factor of hundreds. Understanding the implications on the GeV cascade emission requires accounting for inverse-Compton cooling.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Simulations of Astrophysically Relevant Pair Beam Instabilities in a Laboratory Context
PIC simulations with a broad Cauchy momentum distribution show electrostatic instabilities dominate for dilute warm pair beams, with an extrapolated astrophysical energy loss near 4 percent and negligible angular broadening.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.