Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.
Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links
Paper Citation Record · LEDGER
Are Machines Better at Complex Reasoning? Unveiling Human-Machine Inference Gaps in Entailment Verification
As of 11 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 0 of 0 outbound references and 1 inbound Pith citation observation for arXiv:2402.03686.
A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.
Coverage vector
One-hop event checks from named stored sources.
Source: scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache, observed 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00
Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.
Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links, observed 2026-07-12T06:23:49.752475Z
A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.
Source: cited_works
Reference resolution
0 of 0 outbound references displayed
- verified exact0
- verified fuzzy0
- unresolved0
- parse uncertain0
- malformed identifier0
- metadata mismatch0
External citation measurements
No source-named external measurement is stored.
Outbound references
No outbound reference observations are available for this paper version.
Pith citing papers
Observation 6cc44bb4-0e70-478d-be52-0675e98ec7cc · inbound
Where do LLMs Fall Short in CBT-Guided Affective Reasoning? cites this paper.
Where do LLMs Fall Short in CBT-Guided Affective Reasoning? Are Machines Better at Complex Reasoning? Unveiling Human-Machine Inference Gaps in Entailment Verification
Reference 28
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-07-12T06:23:49.752475Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.