Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Difference-in-Differences Estimators with Continuous Treatments and no Stayers

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.05432 v1 pith:MYESOEFV submitted 2024-02-08 econ.EM

classification econ.EM
keywords treatmentcontinuouseffectsestimatorsstayerstreatmentscaseschaisemartin
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Many treatments or policy interventions are continuous in nature. Examples include prices, taxes or temperatures. Empirical researchers have usually relied on two-way fixed effect regressions to estimate treatment effects in such cases. However, such estimators are not robust to heterogeneous treatment effects in general; they also rely on the linearity of treatment effects. We propose estimators for continuous treatments that do not impose those restrictions, and that can be used when there are no stayers: the treatment of all units changes from one period to the next. We start by extending the nonparametric results of de Chaisemartin et al. (2023) to cases without stayers. We also present a parametric estimator, and use it to revisit Desch\^enes and Greenstone (2012).

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools