REVIEW 2 cited by
Optimal Forecast Reconciliation with Uncertainty Quantification
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We propose to estimate the weight matrix used for forecast reconciliation as parameters in a general linear model in order to quantify its uncertainty. This implies that forecast reconciliation can be formulated as an orthogonal projection from the space of base-forecast errors into a coherent linear subspace. We use variance decomposition together with the Wishart distribution to derive the central estimator for the forecast-error covariance matrix. In addition, we prove that distance-reducing properties apply to the reconciled forecasts at all levels of the hierarchy as well as to the forecast-error covariance. A covariance matrix for the reconciliation weight matrix is derived, which leads to improved estimates of the forecast-error covariance matrix. We show how shrinkage can be introduced in the formulated model by imposing specific priors on the weight matrix and the forecast-error covariance matrix. The method is illustrated in a simulation study that shows consistent improvements in the log-score. Finally, standard errors for the weight matrix and the variance-separation formula are illustrated using a case study of forecasting electricity load in Sweden.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Online forecast reconciliation using linear models
A framework for online forecast reconciliation is developed via multivariate linear models on graph hierarchies, ridge regression, and recursive least squares, with a demonstration on district heating load data.
-
Model selection with proper scoring rules on data sets of time series: prefer the mean scaled score
Mean scaled score is recommended over rank-based aggregation for model selection on time series datasets because skewness causes non-mean criteria to select misspecified models with short tests.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.