Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 1 minor 59 references

Inversion of limited-aperture Fresnel experimental data using orthogonality sampling method with single and multiple sources

T0 review · 1 major / 1 minor · reviewed 2026-05-24 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The orthogonality sampling method with multiple sources identifies small objects uniquely from limited-aperture data via an indicator function built from squared Bessel functions.

desk verdict The paper gives explicit Bessel expressions for limited-aperture OSM indicators with single and multi-source setups and tests them on Fresnel data, but the uniqueness claim for the multi-source version depends on an unverified small-object point-scatterer model. read the letter →

arxiv 2402.09740 v1 submitted 2024-02-15 math.NA cs.NA

Won-Kwang Park This is my paper
classification math.NAcs.NA
keywords orthogonalitysamplingmethodlimited-apertureinversescatteringFresnelexperimentaldataBesselfunctionsmultiplesourcessmallobjectidentification
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper applies the orthogonality sampling method to limited-aperture inverse scattering for identifying small objects. With a single source the indicator function is built from the Bessel function of order zero plus an infinite series of higher-order Bessel functions, so identification quality depends on source location and chosen frequency. Extending the method to multiple sources produces a new indicator function that is the square of the zero-order Bessel function plus an infinite series of squares of the higher-order terms. The resulting structure supports unique identification of the objects independent of any single source position. Numerical tests on Fresnel experimental data show both the limitations of the single-source version and the improved behavior of the multi-source version.

What carries the argument

The multi-source indicator function of the orthogonality sampling method, which equals the square of the zero-order Bessel function of the first kind plus the sum of squares of all nonzero integer-order Bessel functions of the first kind.

What would settle it

A test case in which the multi-source indicator function fails to produce sharp peaks exactly at the true object locations when the objects are no longer small compared with the wavelength or when the aperture is further restricted would show the identification claim does not hold.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper establishes that the indicator function of the orthogonality sampling method with multiple sources can be expressed exactly as the square of the Bessel function of order zero of the first kind plus an infinite series of squares of the Bessel functions of nonzero integer orders of the first kind. This explicit form shows that the objects can be identified uniquely through the designed multi-source OSM, in contrast to the single-source case whose performance remains sensitive to emitter location and frequency.

Load-bearing premise

The scattering objects are small enough that the far-field approximation and point-scatterer model used to derive the indicator functions remain valid at the frequencies and aperture limits considered.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Single-source OSM identification quality varies with emitter location and applied frequency.
  • The multi-source OSM removes that dependence and supports unique object identification.
  • The method applies directly to limited-aperture experimental data sets such as those from the Fresnel institute.
  • The explicit Bessel-function form of the indicator explains both the success and the remaining limitations observed in the experiments.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same squared-Bessel structure may appear in other far-field sampling methods once multiple illuminations are combined.
  • If the small-object assumption is relaxed, a correction term could be derived to restore uniqueness for moderately sized scatterers.
  • Combining the multi-source indicator across several frequencies would likely sharpen the peaks without changing the underlying Bessel identity.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper derives explicit expressions for the orthogonality sampling method (OSM) indicator in limited-aperture inverse scattering of small objects. For a single source the indicator is expressed exactly via the Bessel function of order zero, an infinite series of Bessel functions of nonzero integer orders, the receiver aperture range, and emitter location. A multi-source indicator is then designed whose form is shown to be exactly J_0 squared plus the infinite sum of squares of J_n (n ≠ 0). The authors conclude that this structure permits unique identification of objects and illustrate the single- and multi-source behaviors on Institute Fresnel experimental data.

Significance. The explicit Bessel-series representations supply a concrete, falsifiable characterization of how source location and frequency affect the single-source indicator and how summation over sources removes that dependence. If the underlying point-scatterer model remains valid, the multi-source construction supplies a parameter-free uniqueness argument that is rare in sampling-type methods. The use of real Fresnel data provides a direct test of practical performance.

major comments (1)
  1. [theoretical derivation of the multi-source OSM indicator] The derivation of the multi-source indicator (the section following the single-source analysis) substitutes the constant scattering amplitude of a point scatterer into the limited-aperture far-field integral and obtains the claimed combination of squared Bessel functions. This substitution holds only when ka ≪ 1 for every scatterer at the operating frequencies. The manuscript applies the resulting indicator to the Institute Fresnel cylinders yet never reports the radii or frequencies used, nor verifies that the small-object regime is satisfied. Because the uniqueness claim rests on the indicator equaling exactly that Bessel expression, the missing verification is load-bearing for the central theoretical and experimental conclusions.
minor comments (1)
  1. [abstract] The abstract states that the single-source indicator depends on 'range of signal receiver, and the location of emitter' but does not indicate whether these quantities appear inside or outside the Bessel series; a short clarifying sentence would help readers.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed and constructive review. The observation regarding verification of the small-object regime is valid and directly impacts the strength of our theoretical claims when applied to experimental data. We address this point below and will revise the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The derivation of the multi-source indicator (the section following the single-source analysis) substitutes the constant scattering amplitude of a point scatterer into the limited-aperture far-field integral and obtains the claimed combination of squared Bessel functions. This substitution holds only when ka ≪ 1 for every scatterer at the operating frequencies. The manuscript applies the resulting indicator to the Institute Fresnel cylinders yet never reports the radii or frequencies used, nor verifies that the small-object regime is satisfied. Because the uniqueness claim rests on the indicator equaling exactly that Bessel expression, the missing verification is load-bearing for the central theoretical and experimental conclusions.

    Authors: We agree that the multi-source indicator derivation relies on the constant scattering amplitude valid under the point-scatterer (ka ≪ 1) assumption, and that explicit verification strengthens the link to the Fresnel experiments. The manuscript states the focus on small objects but omits the specific parameters. In the revised version we will add the cylinder radii from the Fresnel database, the operating frequencies employed, and the resulting ka values to confirm the regime holds for the data sets considered. This addition will make the uniqueness argument more rigorous without altering the theoretical derivations. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: derivations are forward from scattering model

full rationale

The paper starts from the standard point-scatterer far-field model, substitutes into the OSM integral, and algebraically obtains the explicit single-source indicator (Bessel J_0 plus series of J_n) and the designed multi-source indicator (J_0 squared plus series of J_n squared). These are explicit mathematical consequences of the model assumptions, not fitted parameters renamed as predictions, not self-definitions, and not dependent on load-bearing self-citations. The Fresnel data are used only for numerical validation after the expressions are derived; the theoretical uniqueness claim follows directly from the derived functional form under the stated model. No step reduces to its own input by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the standard far-field scattering model for small objects and the mathematical properties of Bessel functions; no new free parameters, ad-hoc axioms, or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

assumptions (2)
  • domain assumption Far-field approximation holds for the scattered field from small objects at the applied frequencies
    Required to obtain the Bessel-function form of the indicator from the scattering integral
  • standard math Bessel function orthogonality and addition theorems apply directly to the limited-aperture integral
    Used to reduce the indicator to the stated series of Bessel terms

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Inversion of limited-aperture Fresnel experimental data using orthogonality sampling method with single and multiple sources." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2402.09740

@misc{pith2026240209740,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Inversion of limited-aperture Fresnel experimental data using orthogonality sampling method with single and multiple sources},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2402.09740}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2402.09740}
}
read the original abstract

In this study, we consider the application of orthogonality sampling method (OSM) with single and multiple sources for a fast identification of small objects in limited-aperture inverse scattering problem. We first apply the OSM with single source and show that the indicator function with single source can be expressed by the Bessel function of order zero of the first kind, infinite series of Bessel function of nonzero integer order of the first kind, range of signal receiver, and the location of emitter. Based on this result, we explain that the objects can be identified through the OSM with single source but the identification is significantly influenced by the location of source and applied frequency. For a successful improvement, we then consider the OSM with multiple sources. Based on the identified structure of the OSM with single source, we design an indicator function of the OSM with multiple sources and show that it can be expressed by the square of the Bessel function of order zero of the first kind an infinite series of the square of Bessel function of nonzero integer order of the first kind. Based on the theoretical results, we explain that the objects can be identified uniquely through the designed OSM. Several numerical experiments with experimental data provided by the Institute Fresnel demonstrate the pros and cons of the OSM with single source and how the designed OSM with multiple sources behave.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2402.09740 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Illustration of measurement configuration corres [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Plots of |J0(kbx)| and D1(x) for −1 ≤ x ≤ 1 and f = 2 GHz. 4. Simulation results with experimental data Here, we exhibit simulation results using experimental data [48]. The emitters and receivers are placed on the circles centered at the origin with radii |am| = 0.72 m and |bn| = 0.76 m, respectively, the the 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Illustration of antenna arrangement with transmi [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (8 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Maps of FOSM(r ′ , a1). White colored circles describes the boundary of objects. one can examine several simulation results for the improvement of the multi-frequency OSM. Hence, we consider the application of multiple sources at a fixed frequency. Following to [41], t…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Maps of FOSM(r ′ , a10). White colored circles describes the boundary of objects. vector, H(r ′ ) =  G(r ′ , a1), G(r ′ , a2), . . . , G(r ′ , aM )  , r ′ ∈ Ω, the following indicator function (say, MOSM) with multiple sources can be introduced FMOSM(r ′ ) = |F(r ′ )…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Maps of FOSM(r ′ , a25). White colored circles describes the boundary of objects. Proof. Based on (3), we have X M m=1 Φ(r ′ , am)G(r ′ , am) = X M m=1  kb 6|b| Z D  ε(r) − εb εbµb  G(r, am)  J0(kb|r ′ − r|) + 12 5π E(r ′ , r, am)  dr  G(r ′ , am) = kb 6|b| Z D …
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Plots of J0(kbx) 2 and D2(x) for −1 ≤ x ≤ 1 and f = 2 GHz. and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: 1-D Plots of FOSM(r ′ , a1) and FMOSM(r ′ ) for r = (0, 0) and r ′ = (x, 0), −1 ≤ x ≤ 1, at f = 2 GHz. Based on the Theorem 5.1 and Remark 5.1, we can also obtain the following result of unique determina￾tion. Theorem 5.2 (Unique determination of small objects). Assume…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Maps of FOSMM(r ′ ) and FMOSM(r ′ ), and Jaccard index versus threshold. applicability and limitation. We have also verified the theoretical result with experimental data at various frequencies. In order to improve the imaging performance of the OSM, we have collected …
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Maps of FOSMM(r ′ ) and FMOSM(r ′ ), and Jaccard index versus threshold. [4] N. Simonov, B.-R. Kim, K.-J. Lee, S.-I. Jeon, S.-H. Son, Advanced fast 3-D electromagnetic solver for microwave tomog￾raphy imaging, IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 36 (10) (2017) 2160–2170. [5] E. J.…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Maps of FOSMM(r ′ ) and FMOSM(r ′ ), and Jaccard index versus threshold. [19] D. Colton, R. Kress, Inverse Acoustic and Electromagnetic Scattering Problems, vol. 93 of Mathematics and Applications Series, Springer, New York, 1998. [20] N. K. Nikolova, Introduction to …

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

59 extracted references · 59 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Abubakar, P

    A. Abubakar, P. M. van den Berg, J. J. Mallorqui, Imaging o f biomedical data using a multiplicative regularized contr ast source inversion method, IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 5 0 (7) (2002) 1761–1771

    work page 2002

  2. [2]

    Mojabi, J

    P. Mojabi, J. LoVetri, Microwave biomedical imaging usi ng the multiplicative regularized Gauss-Newton inversion , IEEE Antennas Propag. Lett. 8 (2009) 645–648

    work page 2009

  3. [3]

    Co¸ s˘ gun, E

    S. Co¸ s˘ gun, E. Bilgin, M. C ¸ ay¨ oren, Microwave imagingof breast cancer with factorization method: SPIONs as contr ast agent, Med. Phys. 47 (7) (2020) 3113–3122. 14 (a) FOSMM(r′) at f = 3 GHz (b) FMOSM(r′) at f = 3 GHz (c) Jaccard index at f = 3 GHz (d) FOSMM(r′) at f = 4 GHz (e) FMOSM(r′) at f = 4 GHz (f) Jaccard index at f = 4 GHz Figure 10: Maps o...

    work page 2020

  4. [4]

    Simonov, B.-R

    N. Simonov, B.-R. Kim, K.-J. Lee, S.-I. Jeon, S.-H. Son, A dvanced fast 3-D electromagnetic solver for microwave tomo g- raphy imaging, IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 36 (10) (2017) 2160–21 70

    work page 2017

  5. [5]

    E. J. Baranoski, Through-wall imaging: Historical pers pective and future directions, J. Franklin Inst. 345 (2008) 556–569

    work page 2008

  6. [6]

    Soldovieri, R

    F. Soldovieri, R. Solimene, F. Ahmad, Sparse tomographi c inverse scattering approach for through-the-wall radar i maging, IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 61 (12) (2012) 3340–3350

    work page 2012

  7. [7]

    M. Q. Feng, F. D. Flaviis, Y. J. Kim, Use of microwaves for d amage detection of fiber reinforced polymer-wrapped concre te structures, J. Eng. Mech. 128 (2002) 172–183

    work page 2002

  8. [8]

    W ang, Q

    B. W ang, Q. Zhang, W. Zhao, Fast concrete crack detection method via L2 sparse representation, Electron. Lett. 54 (12 ) (2018) 752–754

    work page 2018

Show all 59 references
  1. [9]

    Delbary, K

    F. Delbary, K. Erhard, R. Kress, R. Potthast, J. Schulz, I nverse electromagnetic scattering in a two-layered medium with an application to mine detection, Inverse Probl. 24 (2008) A rticle No. 015002

    2008

  2. [10]

    P. Gao, L. Collins, P. M. Garber, N. Geng, L. Carin, Class ification of landmine-like metal targets using wideband ele ctro- magnetic induction, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 38 (20 00) 1352–1361

  3. [11]

    Cheney, A mathematical tutorial on Synthetic Apertu re Radar, SIAM Rev

    M. Cheney, A mathematical tutorial on Synthetic Apertu re Radar, SIAM Rev. 43 (2001) 301–312

    2001

  4. [12]

    Garnier, K

    J. Garnier, K. Sølna, Coherent interferometric imagin g for synthetic aperture radar in the presence of noise, Inve rse Probl. 24 (2008) Article No. 055001

    2008

  5. [13]

    Y. ´A. L´ opez, M. Garc ´ ıa-Fern´ andez, G.´Alvarez-Narciandi, F. L. H. Andr´ es, Unmanned Aerial Vehic le-Based Ground- Penetrating Radar Systems: A review, IEEE Geosci. Remote Se ns. Mag. 10 (2) (2022) 66–86

    2022

  6. [14]

    X. Liu, M. Serhir, M. Lambert, Detectability of undergr ound electrical cables junction with a ground penetrating r adar: electromagnetic simulation and experimental measurement s, Constr. Build. Mater. 158 (2018) 1099–1110

    2018

  7. [15]

    Ammari, An Introduction to Mathematics of Emerging B iomedical Imaging, vol

    H. Ammari, An Introduction to Mathematics of Emerging B iomedical Imaging, vol. 62 of Mathematics and Applications Series, Springer, Berlin, 2008

    2008

  8. [16]

    Ammari, Mathematical Modeling in Biomedical Imagin g II: Optical, Ultrasound, and Opto-Acoustic Tomographies , vol

    H. Ammari, Mathematical Modeling in Biomedical Imagin g II: Optical, Ultrasound, and Opto-Acoustic Tomographies , vol. 2035 of Lecture Notes in Mathematics , Springer, Berlin, 2011

  9. [17]

    Bleistein, J

    N. Bleistein, J. Cohen, J. S. Stockwell Jr, Mathematics of Multidimensional Seismic Imaging, Migration, and Inver sion, vol. 13 of Interdisciplinary Applied Mathematics , Springer, New York, 2001

    2001

  10. [18]

    V. S. Chernyak, Fundamentals of Multisite Radar System s: Multistatic Radars and Multiradar Systems, CRC Press, Routledge, 1998. 15 (a) FOSMM(r′) at f = 6 GHz (b) FMOSM(r′) at f = 6 GHz (c) Jaccard index at f = 6 GHz (d) FOSMM(r′) at f = 8 GHz (e) FMOSM(r′) at f = 8 GHz (f) Ja...

    1998

  11. [19]

    Colton, R

    D. Colton, R. Kress, Inverse Acoustic and Electromagne tic Scattering Problems, vol. 93 of Mathematics and Applications Series, Springer, New York, 1998

    1998

  12. [20]

    N. K. Nikolova, Introduction to Microwave Imaging, Cam bridge University Press, 2017

    2017

  13. [21]

    D. M. Pozar, Microwave Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, I nc., 4 edn., 2011

    2011

  14. [22]

    M. S. Zhdanov, Geophysical Inverse Theory and Regulari zation Problems, Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 20 02

  15. [23]

    Jofre, A

    L. Jofre, A. Broquetas, J. Romeu, S. Blanch, A. P. Toda, X . Fabregas, A. Cardama, UWB tomographic radar imaging of penetrable and impenetrable objects, Proc. IEEE 97 (2) (200 9) 451–464

  16. [24]

    Kang, W.-K

    S. Kang, W.-K. Park, A novel study on the bifocusing meth od in two-dimensional inverse scattering problem, AIMS Mat h. 8 (11) (2023) 27080–27112

    2023

  17. [25]

    Son, W.-K

    S.-H. Son, W.-K. Park, Application of the bifocusing me thod in microwave imaging without background information, J. Korean Soc. Ind. Appl. Math. 27 (2) (2023) 109–122

    2023

  18. [26]

    C. Y. Ahn, T. Ha, W.-K. Park, Direct sampling method for i dentifying magnetic inhomogeneities in limited-aperture inverse scattering problem, Comput. Math. Appl. 80 (12) (20 20) 2811–2829

  19. [27]

    K. Ito, B. Jin, J. Zou, A direct sampling method to an inve rse medium scattering problem, Inverse Probl. 28 (2) (2012) Article No. 025003

    2012

  20. [28]

    S. Kang, M. Lambert, C. Y. Ahn, T. Ha, W.-K. Park, Single- and multi-frequency direct sampling methods in limited- aperture inverse scattering problem, IEEE Access 8 (2020) 1 21637–121649

    2020

  21. [29]

    J. Guo, G. Yan, J. Jin, J. Hu, The factorization method fo r cracks in inhomogeneous media, Appl. Math. 62 (2017) 509–533

    2017

  22. [30]

    K. H. Leem, J. Liu, G. Pelekanos, An extended direct fact orization method for inverse scattering with limited apert ure data, Inverse Probl. Sci. Eng. 28 (6) (2020) 754–776

    2020

  23. [31]

    Park, Experimental validation of the factorizat ion method to microwave imaging, Results Phys

    W.-K. Park, Experimental validation of the factorizat ion method to microwave imaging, Results Phys. 17 (2020) Art icle No. 103071

    2020

  24. [32]

    Ammari, E

    H. Ammari, E. Iakovleva, D. Lesselier, G. Perrusson, MU SIC type electromagnetic imaging of a collection of small th ree- dimensional inclusions, SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 29 (2) (2007) 6 74–709

    2007

  25. [33]

    Park, Application of MUSIC algorithm in real-wor ld microwave imaging of unknown anomalies from scattering matrix, Mech

    W.-K. Park, Application of MUSIC algorithm in real-wor ld microwave imaging of unknown anomalies from scattering matrix, Mech. Syst. Signal Proc. 153 (2021) Article No. 1075 01

    2021

  26. [34]

    Zhong, X

    Y. Zhong, X. Chen, MUSIC imaging and electromagnetic in verse scattering of multiple-scattering small anisotropi c spheres, 16 IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 55 (2007) 3542–3549

    2007

  27. [35]

    Ammari, J

    H. Ammari, J. Garnier, H. Kang, W.-K. Park, K. Sølna, Ima ging schemes for perfectly conducting cracks, SIAM J. Appl. Math. 71 (1) (2011) 68–91

    2011

  28. [36]

    Park, Real-time microwave imaging of unknown ano malies via scattering matrix, Mech

    W.-K. Park, Real-time microwave imaging of unknown ano malies via scattering matrix, Mech. Syst. Signal Proc. 118 (2019) 658–674

    2019

  29. [37]

    Park, On the identification of small anomaly in mic rowave imaging without homogeneous background informatio n, AIMS Math

    W.-K. Park, On the identification of small anomaly in mic rowave imaging without homogeneous background informatio n, AIMS Math. 8 (11) (2023) 27210–27226

    2023

  30. [38]

    J. F. Funes, J. M. Perales, M.-L. Rap´ un, J. M. Vega, Defe ct detection from multi-frequency limited data via topolog ical sensitivity, J. Math. Imaging Vis. 55 (2016) 19–35

    2016

  31. [39]

    F. L. Lou¨ er, M.-L. Rap´ un, Topological sensitivity for solving inverse multiple scattering problems in 3D electr omagnetism. Part I: one step method, SIAM J. Imag. Sci. 10 (3) (2017) 1291– 1321

    2017

  32. [40]

    Park, Performance analysis of multi-frequency t opological derivative for reconstructing perfectly condu cting cracks, J

    W.-K. Park, Performance analysis of multi-frequency t opological derivative for reconstructing perfectly condu cting cracks, J. Comput. Phys. 335 (2017) 865–884

    2017

  33. [41]

    Potthast, A study on orthogonality sampling, Invers e Probl

    R. Potthast, A study on orthogonality sampling, Invers e Probl. 26 (2010) Article No. 074015

    2010

  34. [42]

    C. Y. Ahn, S. Chae, W.-K. Park, Fast identification of sho rt, sound-soft open arcs by the orthogonality sampling meth od in the limited-aperture inverse scattering problem, Appl. Math. Lett. 109 (2020) Article No. 106556

    2020

  35. [43]

    M. T. Bevacqua, T. Isernia, R. Palmeri, M. N. Akinci, L. C rocco, Physical insight unveils new imaging capabilities o f orthogonality sampling method, IEEE Trans. Antennas Propa g. 68 (5) (2020) 4014–4021

    2020

  36. [44]

    Griesmaier, Multi-frequency orthogonality sampli ng for inverse obstacle scattering problems, Inverse Probl

    R. Griesmaier, Multi-frequency orthogonality sampli ng for inverse obstacle scattering problems, Inverse Probl . 27 (2011) Article No. 085005

    2011

  37. [45]

    Harris, D.-L

    I. Harris, D.-L. Nguyen, Orthogonality sampling metho d for the electromagnetic inverse scattering problem, SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 42 (3) (2020) B722–B737

    2020

  38. [46]

    S. Kang, S. Chae, W.-K. Park, A study on the orthogonalit y sampling method corresponding to the observation directi ons configuration, Res. Phys. 33 (2022) Article No. 105108

    2022

  39. [47]

    Le, D.-L

    T. Le, D.-L. Nguyen, H. Schmidt, T. Truong, Imaging of 3D objects with experimental data using orthogonality sampli ng methods, Inverse Probl. 38 (2) (2021) Article No. 025007

    2021

  40. [48]

    Belkebir, M

    K. Belkebir, M. Saillard, Special section: Testing inv ersion algorithms against experimental data, Inverse Prob l. 17 (2001) 1565–1571

    2001

  41. [49]

    Ammari, H

    H. Ammari, H. Kang, Reconstruction of Small Inhomogene ities from Boundary Measurements, vol. 1846 of Lecture Notes in Mathematics , Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2004

    2004

  42. [50]

    Capdeboscq, M

    Y. Capdeboscq, M. Vogelius, Imagerie ´ electromagn´ etique de petites inhomog´ en´ eiti´ es, ESAIM: Proc. 22 (2008)40–51

    2008

  43. [51]

    Park, Multi-frequency subspace migration for im aging of perfectly conducting, arc-like cracks in full- and limited- view inverse scattering problems, J

    W.-K. Park, Multi-frequency subspace migration for im aging of perfectly conducting, arc-like cracks in full- and limited- view inverse scattering problems, J. Comput. Phys. 283 (201 5) 52–80

  44. [52]

    Belkebir, A

    K. Belkebir, A. G. Tijhuis, Modified 2 gradient method and modified Born method for solving a two-di mensional inverse scattering problem, Inverse Probl. 17 (2001) 1671–1688

    2001

  45. [53]

    R. F. Bloemenkamp, A. Abubakar, P. M. van den Berg, Inver sion of experimental multi-frequency data using the contra st source inversion method, Inverse Probl. 17 (2001) 1611–162 2

    2001

  46. [54]

    Carpio, M

    A. Carpio, M. Pena, M.-L. Rap´ un, Processing the 2D and 3 D Fresnel experimental databases via topological derivati ve methods, Inverse Probl. 37 (2021) Article No. 105012

    2021

  47. [55]

    Marklein, K

    R. Marklein, K. Balasubramanian, A. Qing, K. J. Langenb erg, Linear and nonlinear iterative scalar inversion of mul ti- frequency multi-bistatic experimental electromagnetic s cattering data, Inverse Probl. 17 (2001) 1597–1610

    2001

  48. [56]

    Ammari, J

    H. Ammari, J. Garnier, W. Jing, H. Kang, M. Lim, K. Sølna, H. W ang, Mathematical and statistical methods for multistatic imaging, vol. 2098 of Lecture Notes in Mathematics , Springer, Cham, 2013

  49. [57]

    Park, Real-time detection of small anomaly from l imited-aperture measurements in real-world microwave ima ging, Mech

    W.-K. Park, Real-time detection of small anomaly from l imited-aperture measurements in real-world microwave ima ging, Mech. Syst. Signal Proc. 171 (2022) Article No. 108937

    2022

  50. [58]

    Jaccard, The distribution of the flora in the alpine zo ne, New Phytol

    P. Jaccard, The distribution of the flora in the alpine zo ne, New Phytol. 11 (1912) 37–50

    1912

  51. [59]

    Geffrin, P

    J.-M. Geffrin, P. Sabouroux, C. Eyraud, Free space exper imental scattering database continuation: experimental s et-up and measurement precision, Inverse Probl. 21 (6) (2005) S11 7–S130. 17

    2005

Pith tools

Reviewed May 24, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.