Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Two-Sample Hypothesis Testing for Large Random Graphs of Unequal Size

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.11133 v1 pith:DFIKLUAG submitted 2024-02-16 stat.ME

classification stat.ME
keywords graphsteststatisticbeenfrobeniushypothesislargematrices
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Two-sample hypothesis testing for large graphs is popular in cognitive science, probabilistic machine learning and artificial intelligence. While numerous methods have been proposed in the literature to address this problem, less attention has been devoted to scenarios involving graphs of unequal size or situations where there are only one or a few samples of graphs. In this article, we propose a Frobenius test statistic tailored for small sample sizes and unequal-sized random graphs to test whether they are generated from the same model or not. Our approach involves an algorithm for generating bootstrapped adjacency matrices from estimated community-wise edge probability matrices, forming the basis of the Frobenius test statistic. We derive the asymptotic distribution of the proposed test statistic and validate its stability and efficiency in detecting minor differences in underlying models through simulations. Furthermore, we explore its application to fMRI data where we are able to distinguish brain activity patterns when subjects are exposed to sentences and pictures for two different stimuli and the control group.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools