Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Hybrid Physics-Based and Data-Driven Modeling of Vascular Bifurcation Pressure Differences

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.15651 v1 pith:XJIGQLTI submitted 2024-02-23 cs.CE

classification cs.CE
keywords bifurcationmodelpressureromsdifferentvascularaccuracyassumption
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Reduced-order models (ROMs) allow for the simulation of blood flow in patient-specific vasculatures without the high computational cost and wait time associated with traditional computational fluid dynamics (CFD) models. Unfortunately, due to the simplifications made in their formulations, ROMs can suffer from significantly reduced accuracy. One common simplifying assumption is the continuity of static or total pressure over vascular junctions. In many cases, this assumption has been shown to introduce significant error. We propose a model to account for this pressure difference, with the ultimate goal of increasing the accuracy of cardiovascular ROMs. Our model successfully uses a structure common in existing ROMs in conjunction with machine-learning techniques to predict the pressure difference over a vascular bifurcation. We analyze the performance of our model on steady and transient flows, testing it on three bifurcation cohorts representing three different bifurcation geometric types. We also compare the efficacy of different machine-learning techniques and two different model modalities.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools