Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

Traffic Control via Connected and Automated Vehicles: An Open-Road Field Experiment with 100 CAVs

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.17043 v1 pith:PXPC2QLG submitted 2024-02-26 eess.SY cs.SY

classification eess.SYcs.SY
keywords controlarchitecturespeedtrafficvehiclescirclesdatalayer
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The CIRCLES project aims to reduce instabilities in traffic flow, which are naturally occurring phenomena due to human driving behavior. These "phantom jams" or "stop-and-go waves,"are a significant source of wasted energy. Toward this goal, the CIRCLES project designed a control system referred to as the MegaController by the CIRCLES team, that could be deployed in real traffic. Our field experiment leveraged a heterogeneous fleet of 100 longitudinally-controlled vehicles as Lagrangian traffic actuators, each of which ran a controller with the architecture described in this paper. The MegaController is a hierarchical control architecture, which consists of two main layers. The upper layer is called Speed Planner, and is a centralized optimal control algorithm. It assigns speed targets to the vehicles, conveyed through the LTE cellular network. The lower layer is a control layer, running on each vehicle. It performs local actuation by overriding the stock adaptive cruise controller, using the stock on-board sensors. The Speed Planner ingests live data feeds provided by third parties, as well as data from our own control vehicles, and uses both to perform the speed assignment. The architecture of the speed planner allows for modular use of standard control techniques, such as optimal control, model predictive control, kernel methods and others, including Deep RL, model predictive control and explicit controllers. Depending on the vehicle architecture, all onboard sensing data can be accessed by the local controllers, or only some. Control inputs vary across different automakers, with inputs ranging from torque or acceleration requests for some cars, and electronic selection of ACC set points in others. The proposed architecture allows for the combination of all possible settings proposed above. Most configurations were tested throughout the ramp up to the MegaVandertest.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 7 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. Universal Scaling Laws in Freeway Traffic

    nlin.CD 2025-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Empirical freeway data show self-organized critical percolation of jam clusters and surface fluctuations consistent with 1+1-dimensional KPZ universality.

  2. Cooperative Cruising: Reinforcement Learning-Based Time-Headway Control for Increased Traffic Efficiency

    cs.MA 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A centralized RL controller that raises ACC time-headways near bottlenecks improved simulated multi-lane highway average speed by up to 7%.

  3. Optimal Control of ODE Car-Following Models: Applications to Mixed-Autonomy Platoon Control via Coupled Autonomous Vehicles

    math.OC 2025-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A rigorous optimal control formulation for a mixed-autonomy platoon with the Bando-FtL model is shown to have a minimizer and is solved by adjoint gradient descent, with simulations showing large reductions in acceler...

  4. Noise-induced stop-and-go traffic dynamics: Modelling and control

    physics.soc-ph 2025-12 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    White Gaussian noise in the gap measurement of the linearly stable ATG car-following model triggers a phase transition to periodic stop-and-go waves; a gain-and-bias transformation restores uniform flow.

  5. Early Versus Late Traffic Management For Autonomous Agents

    eess.SY 2024-11 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A simulation study finds that for a MILP-controlled intersection, enlarging the control region radius improves average delay only up to about 120 m, after which delay plateaus and runtime grows.

Pith tools