REVIEW 5 cited by
Traffic Control via Connected and Automated Vehicles: An Open-Road Field Experiment with 100 CAVs
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
The CIRCLES project aims to reduce instabilities in traffic flow, which are naturally occurring phenomena due to human driving behavior. These "phantom jams" or "stop-and-go waves,"are a significant source of wasted energy. Toward this goal, the CIRCLES project designed a control system referred to as the MegaController by the CIRCLES team, that could be deployed in real traffic. Our field experiment leveraged a heterogeneous fleet of 100 longitudinally-controlled vehicles as Lagrangian traffic actuators, each of which ran a controller with the architecture described in this paper. The MegaController is a hierarchical control architecture, which consists of two main layers. The upper layer is called Speed Planner, and is a centralized optimal control algorithm. It assigns speed targets to the vehicles, conveyed through the LTE cellular network. The lower layer is a control layer, running on each vehicle. It performs local actuation by overriding the stock adaptive cruise controller, using the stock on-board sensors. The Speed Planner ingests live data feeds provided by third parties, as well as data from our own control vehicles, and uses both to perform the speed assignment. The architecture of the speed planner allows for modular use of standard control techniques, such as optimal control, model predictive control, kernel methods and others, including Deep RL, model predictive control and explicit controllers. Depending on the vehicle architecture, all onboard sensing data can be accessed by the local controllers, or only some. Control inputs vary across different automakers, with inputs ranging from torque or acceleration requests for some cars, and electronic selection of ACC set points in others. The proposed architecture allows for the combination of all possible settings proposed above. Most configurations were tested throughout the ramp up to the MegaVandertest.
Forward citations
Cited by 5 Pith papers
-
Universal Scaling Laws in Freeway Traffic
Empirical freeway data show self-organized critical percolation of jam clusters and surface fluctuations consistent with 1+1-dimensional KPZ universality.
-
Cooperative Cruising: Reinforcement Learning-Based Time-Headway Control for Increased Traffic Efficiency
A centralized RL controller that raises ACC time-headways near bottlenecks improved simulated multi-lane highway average speed by up to 7%.
-
Optimal Control of ODE Car-Following Models: Applications to Mixed-Autonomy Platoon Control via Coupled Autonomous Vehicles
A rigorous optimal control formulation for a mixed-autonomy platoon with the Bando-FtL model is shown to have a minimizer and is solved by adjoint gradient descent, with simulations showing large reductions in acceler...
-
Noise-induced stop-and-go traffic dynamics: Modelling and control
White Gaussian noise in the gap measurement of the linearly stable ATG car-following model triggers a phase transition to periodic stop-and-go waves; a gain-and-bias transformation restores uniform flow.
-
Early Versus Late Traffic Management For Autonomous Agents
A simulation study finds that for a MILP-controlled intersection, enlarging the control region radius improves average delay only up to about 120 m, after which delay plateaus and runtime grows.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.