Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Counterspeakers' Perspectives: Unveiling Barriers and AI Needs in the Fight against Online Hate

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2403.00179 v1 pith:TT3EDCLA submitted 2024-02-29 cs.HC

classification cs.HC
keywords counterspeechbarriershatecounterspeakersneedsonlineprocessresponses
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Counterspeech, i.e., direct responses against hate speech, has become an important tool to address the increasing amount of hate online while avoiding censorship. Although AI has been proposed to help scale up counterspeech efforts, this raises questions of how exactly AI could assist in this process, since counterspeech is a deeply empathetic and agentic process for those involved. In this work, we aim to answer this question, by conducting in-depth interviews with 10 extensively experienced counterspeakers and a large scale public survey with 342 everyday social media users. In participant responses, we identified four main types of barriers and AI needs related to resources, training, impact, and personal harms. However, our results also revealed overarching concerns of authenticity, agency, and functionality in using AI tools for counterspeech. To conclude, we discuss considerations for designing AI assistants that lower counterspeaking barriers without jeopardizing its meaning and purpose.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. HatePRISM: Policies, Platforms, and Research Integration. Advancing NLP for Hate Speech Proactive Mitigation

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A tri-partite survey finds that hate speech definitions and moderation practices in country laws, platform policies, and NLP datasets are largely misaligned, and calls for a unified proactive moderation framework.

Pith tools