REVIEW 2 cited by
Testing General Relativity through the $E_G$ Statistic Using the Weyl Potential and Galaxy Velocities
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
We combine measurements of galaxy velocities from galaxy surveys with measurements of the Weyl potential from the Dark Energy Survey to test the consistency of General Relativity at cosmological scales. Taking the ratio of two model-independent observables - the growth rate of structure and the Weyl potential - we obtain new measurements of the $E_G$ statistic with precision of $6.0-11.3\%$ at four different redshifts. These measurements provide a considerable improvement to past measurements of $E_G$. They confirm the validity of General Relativity at four redshifts, with a deviation of at most $1.6\sigma$ from the predicted values. Contrary to conventional methods that rely on a common galaxy sample with spectroscopic resolution to measure two types of correlations, we directly combine two observables that are independent of the galaxy bias. This provides a novel approach to testing the relation between the geometry of our Universe and the motion of galaxies with improved precision.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
A novel test of gravity: Does spacetime geometry track matter density?
The new Ngrow statistic, built from galaxy clustering and lensing, finds no deviation from GR and forecasts stage-IV surveys to bound geometry-density growth mismatches at 2-4%.
-
Forecasting the E_G measurements from the photometric and spectroscopic surveys of Chinese Space Station Survey Telescope (CSST)
CSST forecasts E_G to 3–9% over 0<z<1.2, with the modified-gravity parameter Σ0 constrained to ~5% if β errors follow an assumed external forecast.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.