REVIEW 1 cited by
Uncovering Selective State Space Model's Capabilities in Lifelong Sequential Recommendation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Sequential Recommenders have been widely applied in various online services, aiming to model users' dynamic interests from their sequential interactions. With users increasingly engaging with online platforms, vast amounts of lifelong user behavioral sequences have been generated. However, existing sequential recommender models often struggle to handle such lifelong sequences. The primary challenges stem from computational complexity and the ability to capture long-range dependencies within the sequence. Recently, a state space model featuring a selective mechanism (i.e., Mamba) has emerged. In this work, we investigate the performance of Mamba for lifelong sequential recommendation (i.e., length>=2k). More specifically, we leverage the Mamba block to model lifelong user sequences selectively. We conduct extensive experiments to evaluate the performance of representative sequential recommendation models in the setting of lifelong sequences. Experiments on two real-world datasets demonstrate the superiority of Mamba. We found that RecMamba achieves performance comparable to the representative model while significantly reducing training duration by approximately 70% and memory costs by 80%. Codes and data are available at \url{https://github.com/nancheng58/RecMamba}.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
FindRec: Stein-Guided Entropic Flow for Multi-Modal Sequential Recommendation
FindRec combines Mamba temporal encoding, RBF-kernel cross-modal alignment, and expert routing to improve multimodal sequential recommendation, reporting 1.0 to 3.3 percent relative gains over baselines, with no proof...
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.