Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Search and Society: Reimagining Information Access for Radical Futures

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2403.17901 v4 pith:TAEYV4CK submitted 2024-03-26 cs.IR

classification cs.IR
keywords informationsocialimaginariesmustresearchaccesscommunitydesign
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Information retrieval (IR) research must understand and contend with the social implications of the technology it produces. Instead of adopting a reactionary strategy of trying to mitigate potential social harms from emerging technologies, the community should aim to proactively set the research agenda for the kinds of systems we should build inspired by diverse explicitly stated sociotechnical imaginaries. The sociotechnical imaginaries that underpin the design and development of information access technologies needs to be explicitly articulated, and we need to develop theories of change in context of these diverse perspectives. Our guiding future imaginaries must be informed by other academic fields, such as human-computer interaction, information sciences, media studies, design, science and technology studies, social sciences, humanities, democratic theory, and critical theory, as well as legal and policy experts, civil rights and social justice activists, and artists, among others. In this perspective paper, we motivate why the community must consider this radical shift in how we do research and what we work on, and sketch a path forward towards this transformation.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. We're Still Doing It (All) Wrong: Recommender Systems, Fifteen Years Later

    cs.IR 2025-09 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    Recommender systems research is still dominated by benchmark optimization and flawed evaluation assumptions, and this essay argues the field must adopt epistemic humility and human-centered goals.

Pith tools