Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Screening for Diabetes Mellitus in the U.S. Population Using Neural Network Models and Complex Survey Designs

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2403.19752 v2 pith:JVWUNWZ6 submitted 2024-03-28 stat.ME stat.ML

classification stat.MEstat.ML
keywords modelsdiabetessurveycomplexdatadesignsdifferentpopulation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Complex survey designs are commonly employed in many medical cohorts. In such scenarios, developing case-specific predictive risk score models that reflect the unique characteristics of the study design is essential for minimizing selective biases in the statistical results. The objectives of this paper are to: (i) propose a general predictive framework for regression and classification using neural network (NN) modeling that incorporates survey weights into the estimation process; (ii) introduce an uncertainty quantification algorithm for model prediction tailored to data from complex survey designs; and (iii) apply this method to develop robust risk score models for assessing the risk of Diabetes Mellitus in the US population, utilizing data from the NHANES 2011-2014 cohort. The results indicate that models of varying complexity, each utilizing a different set of variables, demonstrate different discriminative power for predicting diabetes (with different economic cost), yet yield generalizable results at the population level. Although the focus is on diabetes, this NN predictive framework is adaptable for developing clinical models across a diverse range of diseases and medical cohorts. The software and data used in this paper are publicly available on GitHub.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Variable Selection Methods for Multivariate, Functional, and Complex Biomedical Data in the AI Age

    stat.ML 2025-01 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    The paper extends best-subset ridge variable selection to multivariate, functional, and metric-valued responses and claims order-of-magnitude speedups, though the metric-space version is asserted to be equivalent to t...

Pith tools