Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

ConvBench: A Multi-Turn Conversation Evaluation Benchmark with Hierarchical Capability for Large Vision-Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2403.20194 v2 pith:PRQAAYPX submitted 2024-03-29 cs.MM

classification cs.MM
keywords convbenchcapabilityconversationmodelsmulti-turnperceptionperformancereasoning
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper presents ConvBench, a novel multi-turn conversation evaluation benchmark tailored for Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs). Unlike existing benchmarks that assess individual capabilities in single-turn dialogues, ConvBench adopts a three-level multimodal capability hierarchy, mimicking human cognitive processes by stacking up perception, reasoning, and creativity. Each level focuses on a distinct capability, mirroring the cognitive progression from basic perception to logical reasoning and ultimately to advanced creativity. ConvBench comprises 577 meticulously curated multi-turn conversations encompassing 215 tasks reflective of real-world demands. Automatic evaluations quantify response performance at each turn and overall conversation level. Leveraging the capability hierarchy, ConvBench enables precise attribution of conversation mistakes to specific levels. Experimental results reveal a performance gap between multi-modal models, including GPT4-V, and human performance in multi-turn conversations. Additionally, weak fine-grained perception in multi-modal models contributes to reasoning and creation failures. ConvBench serves as a catalyst for further research aimed at enhancing visual dialogues.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Contextualized Evaluation of Vision Language Models through Dynamic, Multi-turn Interactions

    cs.AI 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Context-guided multi-turn interviews reveal more VLM hallucinations than static benchmarks, and those hallucinations increase with conversational history and false-premise questions.

  2. LLMzSz{\L}: a comprehensive LLM benchmark for Polish

    cs.CL 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    LLMzSzŁ is a new benchmark of almost 19,000 Polish national exam questions with evaluations of 38 language models and comparisons to human results.

  3. Governing AI Beyond the Pretraining Frontier

    cs.CY 2025-01 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    If pretraining scaling plateaus while capabilities keep rising through reasoning models, compute-based triggers in the EU AI Act and US export controls will miss the main sources of risk.

  4. MME-Survey: A Comprehensive Survey on Evaluation of Multimodal LLMs

    cs.CV 2024-11 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A broad survey that organizes MLLM evaluation benchmarks into capability categories, explains benchmark construction and scoring methods, and identifies gaps in current evaluation practice.

Pith tools