REVIEW 5 cited by
Arveson's hyperrigidity conjecture is false
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
Arveson's hyperrigidity conjecture predicts that if the non-commutative Choquet boundary of a separable operator system $\mathcal{S}$ is the entire spectrum of its generated C*-algebra $\mathcal{B}$ then $\mathcal{S}$ is hyperrigid in $\mathcal{B}$. We provide a counterexample to the conjecture with a C*-algebra $\mathcal{B}$ of type I generated by a single operator.
Forward citations
Cited by 5 Pith papers
-
The Hyperrigidity Conjecture for compact convex sets in $\mathbb{R}^2$
The affine function space on any compact convex planar set is hyperrigid in the C*-algebra of continuous functions on the extreme points.
-
The Hao-Ng isomorphism theorem for reduced crossed products
For any C*-correspondence with a generalized gauge action by a locally compact Hausdorff group, the Cuntz-Pimsner algebra of the reduced crossed product is canonically isomorphic to the reduced crossed product of the ...
-
A Finite Dimensional Counterexample for Arveson's Hyperrigidity Conjecture
For each 0<c<1, the operator system generated by four concrete operators on L2(S3)⊕C is not hyperrigid, while every irreducible representation of its C*-algebra restricts to a boundary representation.
-
$C^*$-supports and abnormalities of operator systems
C*-supports are unique exactly when the generated C*-algebra lies in every injective envelope, yielding new characterizations of unique extension and hyperrigidity and a formula for the span of abnormalities.
-
Hyperrigidity III
In a unital separable C*-algebra, a set G is hyperrigid exactly when every sequence of representations that converges weakly on G converges strongly on the whole algebra.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.