REVIEW 1 cited by
Treatment Effect Heterogeneity and Importance Measures for Multivariate Continuous Treatments
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
Estimating the joint effect of a multivariate, continuous exposure is crucial, particularly in environmental health where interest lies in simultaneously evaluating the impact of multiple environmental pollutants on health. We develop novel methodology that addresses two key issues for estimation of treatment effects of multivariate, continuous exposures. We use nonparametric Bayesian methodology that is flexible to ensure our approach can capture a wide range of data generating processes. Additionally, we allow the effect of the exposures to be heterogeneous with respect to covariates. Treatment effect heterogeneity has not been well explored in the causal inference literature for multivariate, continuous exposures, and therefore we introduce novel estimands that summarize the nature and extent of the heterogeneity, and propose estimation procedures for new estimands related to treatment effect heterogeneity. We provide theoretical support for the proposed models in the form of posterior contraction rates and show that it works well in simulated examples both with and without heterogeneity. Our approach is motivated by a study of the health effects of simultaneous exposure to the components of PM$_{2.5}$, where we find that the negative health effects of exposure to environmental pollutants are exacerbated by low socioeconomic status, race and age.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Decision Theoretic Subgroup Detection With Bayesian Machine Learning
A new BRAIDS utility interpolates between risk-seeking and risk-averse subgroup detection, and regularized Bayesian models can keep nominal coverage for subgroup effects without sample splitting.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.