Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Private graph colouring with limited defectiveness

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2404.18692 v2 pith:62YCWGYU submitted 2024-04-29 cs.DS

classification cs.DS
keywords colouringprivatedefectivenessalgorithmdifferentiallygraphdeltavertex
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Differential privacy is the gold standard in the problem of privacy preserving data analysis, which is crucial in a wide range of disciplines. Vertex colouring is one of the most fundamental questions about a graph. In this paper, we study the vertex colouring problem in the differentially private setting. To be edge-differentially private, a colouring algorithm needs to be defective: a colouring is d-defective if a vertex can share a colour with at most d of its neighbours. Without defectiveness, the only differentially private colouring algorithm needs to assign n different colours to the n different vertices. We show the following lower bound for the defectiveness: a differentially private c-edge colouring algorithm of a graph of maximum degree {\Delta} > 0 has defectiveness at least d = {\Omega} (log n / (log c+log {\Delta})). We also present an {\epsilon}-differentially private algorithm to {\Theta} ( {\Delta} / log n + 1 / {\epsilon})-colour a graph with defectiveness at most {\Theta}(log n).

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Differentially Private Graph Coloring

    cs.DS 2026-02 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

    Two new differentially private defective-coloring algorithms are asymptotically no better than a trivial random-coloring baseline, and their proofs contain a sign error and an unhandled data-dependent ordering.

Pith tools