Pith. sign in

REVIEW

A faster algorithm for the Fr\'echet distance in 1D for the imbalanced case

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2404.18738 v2 pith:DHRIEG5L submitted 2024-04-29 cs.CG

classification cs.CG
keywords distanceechetcomplexityalgorithmalphabringmanncaseimbalanced
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

The fine-grained complexity of computing the Fr\'echet distance has been a topic of much recent work, starting with the quadratic SETH-based conditional lower bound by Bringmann from 2014. Subsequent work established largely the same complexity lower bounds for the Fr\'echet distance in 1D. However, the imbalanced case, which was shown by Bringmann to be tight in dimensions $d\geq 2$, was still left open. Filling in this gap, we show that a faster algorithm for the Fr\'echet distance in the imbalanced case is possible: Given two 1-dimensional curves of complexity $n$ and $n^{\alpha}$ for some $\alpha \in (0,1)$, we can compute their Fr\'echet distance in $O(n^{2\alpha} \log^2 n + n \log n)$ time. This rules out a conditional lower bound of the form $O((nm)^{1-\epsilon})$ that Bringmann showed for $d \geq 2$ and any $\varepsilon>0$ in turn showing a strict separation with the setting $d=1$. At the heart of our approach lies a data structure that stores a 1-dimensional curve $P$ of complexity $n$, and supports queries with a curve $Q$ of complexity~$m$ for the continuous Fr\'echet distance between $P$ and $Q$. The data structure has size in $\mathcal{O}(n\log n)$ and uses query time in $\mathcal{O}(m^2 \log^2 n)$. Our proof uses a key lemma that is based on the concept of visiting orders and may be of independent interest. We demonstrate this by substantially simplifying the correctness proof of a clustering algorithm by Driemel, Krivo\v{s}ija and Sohler from 2015.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools