pith. sign in

arxiv: 2405.06002 · v2 · submitted 2024-05-09 · ⚛️ physics.gen-ph

Poincar\'e invariance and the Unruh effect

Alexandre Deur , Stanley J. Brodsky , Craig D. Roberts , Bal\v{s}a Terzi\'c This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 01:17 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.gen-ph
keywords Unruh effectquantum field theorycausalityvacuum structurePoincaré invarianceLorentz transformationsacceleration
0
0 comments X

The pith

A causally manifest quantization of quantum field theory yields a trivial vacuum unaffected by acceleration, eliminating the Unruh effect.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper contends that the Unruh effect, in which acceleration converts virtual particle pairs into real thermal radiation, stems from quantization schemes that fail to enforce causality manifestly. When quantum field theory is instead formulated so that causality is patently respected, the vacuum contains no virtual particles at all. Uniform acceleration therefore leaves this empty vacuum unchanged, producing no detectable thermal bath for an accelerating observer. Because conventional calculations are formally consistent yet predict an effect, the authors identify a missing cancelling contribution arising from the dynamical action of standard Lorentz transformations on the structure of any Unruh detector.

Core claim

Choosing a quantization approach that patently enforces causality renders the quantum field theory vacuum barren, with no virtual particles. Acceleration therefore has no effect on this trivial vacuum, so there is no Unruh effect. The apparent effect in standard analyses must be cancelled by the dynamical action of conventional Lorentz transformations on the Unruh detector.

What carries the argument

A quantization approach that patently enforces causality, which produces a trivial vacuum containing no virtual particles.

If this is right

  • Acceleration produces no thermal radiation when the vacuum is treated as trivial under causal quantization.
  • Any Unruh signal in conventional calculations is exactly cancelled by the Lorentz action on the detector.
  • The vacuum remains empty of virtual particles even for accelerated observers.
  • Poincaré invariance is maintained without generating an acceleration-dependent thermal effect.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Other horizon-related phenomena, such as Hawking radiation, may require analogous re-examination under causal quantization.
  • Detector response models in accelerated frames should incorporate explicit Lorentz transformation dynamics to avoid spurious signals.
  • The absence of virtual particles in the causal vacuum alters how pair production is interpreted in strong fields.

Load-bearing premise

A quantization approach that enforces causality manifestly is the physically correct one, and Lorentz transformations on the detector supply the precise cancelling contribution.

What would settle it

A direct calculation or measurement in which the dynamical Lorentz transformation effect on a realistic detector is included yet a net Unruh temperature still appears.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2405.06002 by Alexandre Deur, Bal\v{s}a Terzi\'c, Craig D. Roberts, Stanley J. Brodsky.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Effect of boosts (blue worldline) and constant accelerations (red worldline) on attached IF (left) and FF (right) frames. Thick arrows [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Derivative of the accelerated frame rapidity with proper time. Left panel: IF case [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Origin of IF vacuum complexity. A field φ propagates between events E1 and E2. Equal-time commutation relations imply un￾certainty relations along the fixed-time hypersurface (dotted line). In IF dynamics, timelike events with respect to E1 may become spacelike owing to the Heisenberg uncertainty ∆z2 (left panel). Thus, the time-ordering of E1 and E2 is frame-dependent. When t2 < t1, causality￾violating Z-… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Coordinate frames: Rindler (black), Minkowski IF (red), and FF (blue). As in Fig. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

In quantum field theory, the vacuum is popularly considered to be a complex medium populated with virtual particle + antiparticle pairs. To an observer experiencing uniform acceleration, it is generally held that these virtual particles become real, appearing as a gas at a temperature that grows with the acceleration. This is the Unruh effect. However, it has been shown that vacuum complexity is an artifact, produced by treating quantum field theory in a manner that does not manifestly enforce causality. Choosing a quantization approach that patently enforces causality, the quantum field theory vacuum is barren, bereft even of virtual particles. We show that acceleration has no effect on a trivial vacuum; hence, there is no Unruh effect in such a treatment of quantum field theory. Since the standard calculations suggesting an Unruh effect are formally consistent, insofar as they have been completed, there must be a cancelling contribution that is omitted in the usual analyses. We argue that it is the dynamical action of conventional Lorentz transformations on the structure of an Unruh detector.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper claims that standard QFT treatments produce a complex vacuum with virtual particles as an artifact of failing to manifestly enforce causality; a causality-preserving quantization yields a trivial vacuum, so uniform acceleration has no effect and the Unruh effect is absent. Because standard calculations are formally consistent, the paper argues that they must omit a cancelling contribution arising from the dynamical action of conventional Lorentz transformations on the structure of an Unruh detector.

Significance. If the central claim were substantiated by an explicit derivation showing exact cancellation, the result would challenge a standard prediction of QFT in accelerated frames and potentially affect related claims in curved-spacetime QFT and Hawking radiation. The manuscript supplies no such derivation, however, so the significance cannot be assessed from the provided text.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the assertion that 'there must be a cancelling contribution that is omitted in the usual analyses' is presented as a logical necessity but is not supported by any explicit operator, Bogoliubov-coefficient, or response-function calculation demonstrating that the dynamical Lorentz action on the detector exactly cancels the standard Unruh thermal factor. This identification is load-bearing for the claim that there is 'no Unruh effect'.
  2. The manuscript states that a causality-enforcing quantization produces a 'barren' vacuum unaffected by acceleration, yet supplies neither the explicit mode expansion nor the vacuum definition that would allow verification that the vacuum remains trivial under acceleration. Without this, the contrast with standard treatments remains an assertion rather than a demonstrated result.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for the thoughtful report and the opportunity to clarify the manuscript's arguments. We respond to the major comments below, acknowledging where the presentation can be improved while defending the logical structure of the claims on the basis of the provided text.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the assertion that 'there must be a cancelling contribution that is omitted in the usual analyses' is presented as a logical necessity but is not supported by any explicit operator, Bogoliubov-coefficient, or response-function calculation demonstrating that the dynamical Lorentz action on the detector exactly cancels the standard Unruh thermal factor. This identification is load-bearing for the claim that there is 'no Unruh effect'.

    Authors: The manuscript derives the absence of the Unruh effect from the trivial vacuum obtained under causality-enforcing quantization and notes that standard calculations, being formally consistent, must therefore omit a compensating term; the dynamical action of conventional Lorentz transformations on the detector is proposed as the source of that term. We agree that the manuscript does not supply an explicit operator-level or response-function calculation of the precise cancellation. A revision will rephrase the abstract and discussion sections to present the cancelling contribution as a logical inference required by consistency rather than a completed explicit derivation, and will flag the need for such a calculation as future work. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [—] The manuscript states that a causality-enforcing quantization produces a 'barren' vacuum unaffected by acceleration, yet supplies neither the explicit mode expansion nor the vacuum definition that would allow verification that the vacuum remains trivial under acceleration. Without this, the contrast with standard treatments remains an assertion rather than a demonstrated result.

    Authors: The mode expansion and vacuum definition for the causality-enforcing quantization are established in the cited prior literature on which the present work builds. The manuscript applies that framework to acceleration and the Unruh effect. To address the concern about self-contained verification, the revised version will incorporate a concise summary of the relevant mode expansion and vacuum state. revision: yes

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • An explicit derivation showing that the dynamical Lorentz action on the detector exactly cancels the standard Unruh thermal factor; the manuscript advances this only as a logical necessity arising from the consistency of existing calculations and does not contain the required operator or response-function computation.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Cancelling contribution asserted to exist because standard results must be reconciled with no-Unruh conclusion

specific steps
  1. other [Abstract]
    "Since the standard calculations suggesting an Unruh effect are formally consistent, insofar as they have been completed, there must be a cancelling contribution that is omitted in the usual analyses. We argue that it is the dynamical action of conventional Lorentz transformations on the structure of an Unruh detector."

    The existence and identity of the cancelling contribution are motivated by the prior conclusion that acceleration has no effect on the trivial vacuum (hence no Unruh effect). The paper does not exhibit an explicit matrix element or response-function calculation demonstrating that the Lorentz dynamics exactly cancels the standard Unruh thermal factor; instead the term is introduced to preserve consistency between the no-effect result and the formal consistency of standard calculations.

full rationale

The paper's central chain asserts a trivial vacuum under causality-enforcing quantization, concludes acceleration has no effect, then infers from that conclusion that standard calculations (which are formally consistent) must omit a cancelling term whose identity is argued to be Lorentz dynamics on the detector. This reduces the reconciliation step to the target result rather than an independent operator-level derivation showing exact cancellation of the thermal factor. The step is load-bearing for the claim that there is 'no Unruh effect' once standard analyses are considered.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the validity of a causality-enforcing quantization that produces a trivial vacuum and on the existence of an uncalculated cancelling term from Lorentz transformations on detectors.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption A quantization approach that patently enforces causality yields a barren vacuum bereft of virtual particles.
    Stated directly in the abstract as the basis for concluding that acceleration has no effect.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5714 in / 1249 out tokens · 36657 ms · 2026-05-24T01:17:51.356229+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

44 extracted references · 44 canonical work pages · 8 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Nonuniqueness of canonical field quantization in Riemannian space-time.Phys

    Fulling, S.A. Nonuniqueness of canonical field quantization in Riemannian space-time.Phys. Rev. D1973, 7, 2850–2862.https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.7.2850

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.7.2850

  2. [2]

    Scalar particle production in Schwarzschild and Rindler metrics.J

    Davies, P.C.W. Scalar particle production in Schwarzschild and Rindler metrics.J. Phys. A1975,8, 609– 616.https://doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/8/4/022

    work page doi:10.1088/0305-4470/8/4/022

  3. [3]

    Notes on black hole evaporation.Phys

    Unruh, W.G. Notes on black hole evaporation.Phys. Rev. D1976,14, 870.https://doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRevD.14.870. 17

    work page

  4. [4]

    The Unruh effect and its applications

    Crispino, L.C.B.; Higuchi, A.; Matsas, G.E.A. The Unruh effect and its applications.Rev. Mod. Phys.2008, 80, 787–838, [arXiv:gr-qc/0710.5373].https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.80.787

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/revmodphys.80.787 2008

  5. [5]

    Quantum Chromodynamics and Other Field Theories on the Light Cone

    Brodsky, S.J.; Pauli, H.C.; Pinsky, S.S. Quantum chromodynamics and other field theories on the light cone.Phys. Rept.1998,301, 299–486, [hep-ph/9705477].https://doi.org/10.1016/ S0370-1573(97)00089-6

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  6. [6]

    Forms of Relativistic Dynamics.Rev

    Dirac, P.A.M. Forms of Relativistic Dynamics.Rev. Mod. Phys.1949,21, 392–399.https://doi. org/10.1103/RevModPhys.21.392

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.21.392 1949

  7. [7]

    Chiral magnetism (or magnetohadrochironics).Phys

    Casher, A.; Susskind, L. Chiral magnetism (or magnetohadrochironics).Phys. Rev. D1974,9, 436–460. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.9.436

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.9.436

  8. [8]

    On the Relativity Principle and the Conclusions Drawn from It.Jahrbuch der Radioaktivitat 1907, pp

    Einstein, A. On the Relativity Principle and the Conclusions Drawn from It.Jahrbuch der Radioaktivitat 1907, pp. 411–462

    work page 1907

  9. [9]

    Particle Creation by Black Holes.Commun

    Hawking, S.W. Particle Creation by Black Holes.Commun. Math. Phys.1975,43, 199–220. [Erratum: Commun.Math.Phys. 46, 206 (1976)],https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02345020

    work page doi:10.1007/bf02345020 1975

  10. [10]

    Artificial dynamical effects in quantum field theory.Na- ture Rev

    Brodsky, S.J.; Deur, A.; Roberts, C.D. Artificial dynamical effects in quantum field theory.Na- ture Rev. Phys.2022,4, 489–495, [arXiv:hep-ph/2202.06051].https://doi.org/10.1038/ s42254-022-00453-3

    work page arXiv 2022

  11. [11]

    Unruh Effect in the General Light-Front Frame

    Das, A.K.; Frenkel, J.; Perez, S. Unruh effect in the general light-front frame.Phys. Rev. D2005, 71, 105018, [hep-th/0502243].https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.71.105018

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.71.105018

  12. [12]

    Exclusive Processes in Perturbative Quantum Chromodynamics.Phys

    Lepage, G.P.; Brodsky, S.J. Exclusive Processes in Perturbative Quantum Chromodynamics.Phys. Rev. D 1980,22, 2157.https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.22.2157

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.22.2157 1980

  13. [13]

    Carroll, S.M.Spacetime and Geometry: An Introduction to General Relativity; Cambridge University Press, 2019.https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108770385

    work page doi:10.1017/9781108770385 2019

  14. [14]

    On a New method in the theory of superconductivity.Nuovo Cim.1958,7, 794–805

    Bogolyubov, N.N. On a New method in the theory of superconductivity.Nuovo Cim.1958,7, 794–805. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02745585

    work page doi:10.1007/bf02745585 1958

  15. [15]

    Zur Quantenmechanik einfacher Bewegungstypen.Z

    Kennard, E.H. Zur Quantenmechanik einfacher Bewegungstypen.Z. Phys.1927,44, 326–352.https: //doi.org/10.1007/BF01391200

    work page doi:10.1007/bf01391200 1927

  16. [16]

    THE 1986 DIRAC MEMORIAL LECTURES; Cambridge University Press, 1999

    Feynman, R.P.; Weinberg, S.ELEMENTARY PARTICLES AND THE LAWS OF PHYSICS. THE 1986 DIRAC MEMORIAL LECTURES; Cambridge University Press, 1999

    work page 1986

  17. [17]

    Zee, A.Einstein Gravity in a Nutshell; Princeton University Press: New Jersey, 2013

    work page 2013

  18. [18]

    Vacuum polarization and the absence of free quarks.Phys

    Casher, A.; Kogut, J.B.; Susskind, L. Vacuum polarization and the absence of free quarks.Phys. Rev. D 1974,10, 732–745.https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.10.732

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.10.732 1974

  19. [19]

    Vacuum Polarization and the Absence of Free Quarks in Four-Dimensions.Phys

    Kogut, J.B.; Susskind, L. Vacuum Polarization and the Absence of Free Quarks in Four-Dimensions.Phys. Rev. D1974,9, 3501–3512.https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.9.3501

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.9.3501

  20. [20]

    (D.2) in Annex D,p +′ ∝p +; so, the vacuum momentum is zero in all FF frames;i.e.,p + = 0for the vacuum, even in boosted and accelerated frames

    From the FF momentum boost formula, Eq. (D.2) in Annex D,p +′ ∝p +; so, the vacuum momentum is zero in all FF frames;i.e.,p + = 0for the vacuum, even in boosted and accelerated frames. This contrasts with non-relativistic intuition, as well as with the IF framework, in which boosts mix energy and momentum. Thus, zero-mode (ω→ ∞,p= 0) vacuum contributions ...

    work page

  21. [21]

    THE ELECTROMAGNETIC INTERACTIONS OF LOOSELY BOUND COMPOSITE SYSTEMS.Phys

    Brodsky, S.J.; Primack, J.R. THE ELECTROMAGNETIC INTERACTIONS OF LOOSELY BOUND COMPOSITE SYSTEMS.Phys. Rev.1968,174, 2071–2073.https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRev.174.2071. 18

    work page 1968

  22. [22]

    Pr.: Cambridge, UK, 1979

    Hawking, S.W.; Israel, W.General Relativity: An Einstein Centenary Survey; Univ. Pr.: Cambridge, UK, 1979

    work page 1979

  23. [23]

    Unruh effect.Scholarpedia2014,9, 31789.https://doi.org/10.4249/ scholarpedia.31789

    Fulling, S.; Matsas, G. Unruh effect.Scholarpedia2014,9, 31789.https://doi.org/10.4249/ scholarpedia.31789

    work page

  24. [24]

    Quantum Field Theory for a Rotating Observer.Nuovo Cim

    Denardo, G.; Percacci, R. Quantum Field Theory for a Rotating Observer.Nuovo Cim. B1978,48, 81–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02748650

    work page doi:10.1007/bf02748650

  25. [25]

    The Quantized Scalar Field in Rotating Coordinates.Phys

    Letaw, J.R.; Pfautsch, J.D. The Quantized Scalar Field in Rotating Coordinates.Phys. Rev. D1980, 22, 1345.https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.22.1345

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.22.1345

  26. [26]

    However, to reach this conclusion, boosts are used to move from the center of the rotation to the rotating Unruh detector

    There are claims for the existence of a rotational Unruh effect [? ?]. However, to reach this conclusion, boosts are used to move from the center of the rotation to the rotating Unruh detector. Since IF boosts are involved, a Unruh pseudo-effect can be identified. We will show in a future publication how the claimed effect traces back to boosts and anothe...

    work page

  27. [27]

    The non-triviality of the vacuum in light-front quantization: An elementary treatment

    Collins, J. The non-triviality of the vacuum in light-front quantization: An elementary treatment2018. [arXiv:hep-ph/1801.03960]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  28. [28]

    Strassler, K.M

    Mannheim, P.D.; Lowdon, P.; Brodsky, S.J. Structure of light front vacuum sector diagrams.Phys. Lett. B2019,797, 134916, [arXiv:hep-ph/1904.05253].https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb. 2019.134916

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb 1904

  29. [29]

    It also provides an intuitive understanding of the thermal distribution. The greater distance scale set by larger loops allows for a larger curvature, therefore, by the equivalence principle, a larger acceleration and, in turn, a larger Unruh temperature. Since large loops are less probable than the smaller loops, so also are larger temperatures

    work page

  30. [30]

    ’t Hooft, Nucl

    ’t Hooft, G. A Planar Diagram Theory for Strong Interactions.Nucl. Phys. B1974,72, 461.https: //doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(74)90154-0

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(74)90154-0

  31. [31]

    Poincare and Gauge Invariant Two-Dimensional QCD.Phys

    Bars, I.; Green, M.B. Poincare and Gauge Invariant Two-Dimensional QCD.Phys. Rev. D1978,17, 537. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.17.537

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.17.537

  32. [32]

    Dynamics at infinite momentum.Phys

    Weinberg, S. Dynamics at infinite momentum.Phys. Rev.1966,150, 1313–1318.https://doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRev.150.1313

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.150.1313 1966

  33. [33]

    States of scalar field on space-times with two isometries with timelike orbits.Class

    Chmielowski, P. States of scalar field on space-times with two isometries with timelike orbits.Class. Quant. Grav.1994,11, 41–56.https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/11/1/008

    work page doi:10.1088/0264-9381/11/1/008 1994

  34. [34]

    Fundamental Properties of the Proton in Light-Front Zero Modes.Nucl

    Ji, X. Fundamental Properties of the Proton in Light-Front Zero Modes.Nucl. Phys.2020,B, 115181, [arXiv:hep-ph/2003.04478].https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2020.115181

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2020.115181 2020

  35. [35]

    Condensates in Quantum Chromodynamics and the Cosmological Constant

    Brodsky, S.J.; Shrock, R. Condensates in Quantum Chromodynamics and the Cosmological Constant. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.2011,108, 45–50, [arXiv:hep-th/0905.1151].https://doi.org/10.1073/ pnas.1010113107

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  36. [36]

    Essence of the vacuum quark condensate

    Brodsky, S.J.; Roberts, C.D.; Shrock, R.; Tandy, P.C. Essence of the vacuum quark condensate.Phys. Rev. C2010,82, 022201, [arXiv:nucl-th/1005.4610].https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC. 82.022201. 19

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc

  37. [37]

    Confinement contains condensates

    Brodsky, S.J.; Roberts, C.D.; Shrock, R.; Tandy, P.C. Confinement contains condensates.Phys. Rev. C2012,85, 065202, [arXiv:nucl-th/1202.2376].https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.85. 065202

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc.85

  38. [38]

    What happens when an accelerating observer detects a Rindler particle.Phys

    Unruh, W.G.; Wald, R.M. What happens when an accelerating observer detects a Rindler particle.Phys. Rev. D1984,29, 1047–1056.https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.29.1047

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.29.1047

  39. [39]

    On the Duality Condition for a Hermitian Scalar Field.J

    Bisognano, J.J.; Wichmann, E.H. On the Duality Condition for a Hermitian Scalar Field.J. Math. Phys. 1975,16, 985–1007.https://doi.org/10.1063/1.522605

    work page doi:10.1063/1.522605 1975

  40. [40]

    Finite-temperature field theory; Cambridge University Press, Cambridge UK, 1989

    Kapusta, J.I. Finite-temperature field theory; Cambridge University Press, Cambridge UK, 1989

    work page 1989

  41. [41]

    New approach to field theory.Phys

    Fubini, S.; Hanson, A.J.; Jackiw, R. New approach to field theory.Phys. Rev. D1973,7, 1732–1760. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.7.1732

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.7.1732

  42. [42]

    Light-Cone Dynamics of Particles and Fields

    Heinzl, T. Light cone dynamics of particles and fields. Other thesis, 1998, [hep-th/9812190]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  43. [43]

    Nontrivial vacua from equal time to the light cone.Phys

    Hornbostel, K. Nontrivial vacua from equal time to the light cone.Phys. Rev. D1992,45, 3781–3801. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.45.3781

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.45.3781

  44. [44]

    This may be understood as the flux from sourceadiluting in 2D or 3D space

    In (1+2)D or (1+3)D spacetimes,a∝tanda∝t 2, respectively, are needed to obtain a constant force. This may be understood as the flux from sourceadiluting in 2D or 3D space. To keep a constant force on the accelerating body moving away from the source, the latter must intensify witht. 20

    work page