Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Design Opportunities for Explainable AI Paraphrasing Tools: A User Study with Non-native English Speakers

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.07475 v2 pith:Z4WUPMLZ submitted 2024-05-13 cs.HC

classification cs.HC
keywords informationaidsnnessparaphrasingdesignexplainabletoolsuser
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

We investigate how non-native English speakers (NNESs) interact with diverse information aids to assess and select AI-generated paraphrases. We develop ParaScope, an AI paraphrasing assistant that integrates diverse information aids, such as back-translation, explanations, and usage examples, and logs user interaction data. Our in-lab study with 22 NNESs reveals that user preferences for information aids vary by language proficiency, with workflows progressing from global to more detailed information. While back-translation was the most frequently used aid, it was not a decisive factor in suggestion acceptance; users combined multiple information aids to make informed decisions. Our findings demonstrate the potential of explainable AI paraphrasing tools to enhance NNESs' confidence, autonomy, and writing efficiency, while also emphasizing the importance of thoughtful design to prevent information overload. Based on these findings, we offer design implications for explainable AI paraphrasing tools that support NNESs in making informed decisions when using AI writing systems.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools