REVIEW 1 cited by
Despite Absolute Information Advantages, All Investors Incur Welfare Loss
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
This paper delves into financial markets that incorporate a novel form of heterogeneity among investors, specifically in terms of their beliefs regarding the reliability of signals in the business cycle economy model, which may be biased. Unlike most papers in this field, we not only analyze the equilibrium but also examine welfare using objective measures while investors aim to maximize their utility based on subjective measures. Furthermore, we introduce passive investors and use their utility as a benchmark, thereby revealing the phenomenon of double loss sometimes. In the analysis, we examine two effects: the distortion effect on total welfare and the advantage effect of information and highlight their key factors of influence, with a particular emphasis on the proportion of investors. We also demonstrate that manipulating investors' estimation towards the economy can be a way to improve utility and identify an inner connection between welfare and survival.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
York's Cavity Formalism and Quantum Modified Thermodynamics of (2+1)D Black Holes
The paper claims Barrow entropy corrections reshape BTZ black hole thermodynamics in a cavity, but the free energy analysis rests on a wrong extrinsic curvature term and an incorrect zero-crossing interpretation.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.