Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Despite Absolute Information Advantages, All Investors Incur Welfare Loss

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.08822 v1 pith:IGT3APIC submitted 2024-05-07 q-fin.MF math.PR

classification q-fin.MFmath.PR
keywords investorswelfareutilityeconomyeffectexamineinformationloss
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper delves into financial markets that incorporate a novel form of heterogeneity among investors, specifically in terms of their beliefs regarding the reliability of signals in the business cycle economy model, which may be biased. Unlike most papers in this field, we not only analyze the equilibrium but also examine welfare using objective measures while investors aim to maximize their utility based on subjective measures. Furthermore, we introduce passive investors and use their utility as a benchmark, thereby revealing the phenomenon of double loss sometimes. In the analysis, we examine two effects: the distortion effect on total welfare and the advantage effect of information and highlight their key factors of influence, with a particular emphasis on the proportion of investors. We also demonstrate that manipulating investors' estimation towards the economy can be a way to improve utility and identify an inner connection between welfare and survival.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. York's Cavity Formalism and Quantum Modified Thermodynamics of (2+1)D Black Holes

    gr-qc 2025-06 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    The paper claims Barrow entropy corrections reshape BTZ black hole thermodynamics in a cavity, but the free energy analysis rests on a wrong extrinsic curvature term and an incorrect zero-crossing interpretation.

Pith tools