REVIEW 1 cited by
PALM: A Efficient Performance Simulator for Tiled Accelerators with Large-scale Model Training
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Deep learning (DL) models are piquing high interest and scaling at an unprecedented rate. To this end, a handful of tiled accelerators have been proposed to support such large-scale training tasks. However, these accelerators often incorporate numerous cores or tiles even extending to wafer-scale, substantial on-chip bandwidth, and distributed memory systems. This results in an exceedingly complex design space. Moreover, conducting actual training experiments to find optimal configurations is impractical due to time constraints. Hence, predicting the optimal mapping of various parallelisms to such tiled system architectures becomes crucial. In this study, leveraging an analysis of existing mainstream DL model training strategies, we introduce a performance simulator named PALM. PALM targets both the training and inference processes for tiled accelerators, aiming to inspire the design of current and future accelerators. Specifically, (i) we establish a scheduling mechanism among tiled accelerators based on an event-driven framework; (ii) we support user-configurable pipeline, tensor, and data parallelism on tiled accelerators, determining the absolute performance throughput under these parallelism strategies; (iii) we model the interaction of on-chip SRAM, NoC, and off-chip DRAM during operator execution. This work is available here: https://github.com/fangjh21/PALM.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Fovea: Physical-Implication-Aware Wafer-Scale DSE with Decision-Domain-Guided Cross-Fidelity Refinement
A wafer-scale design-space exploration method constructs physically feasible design spaces and prunes candidates by a sampled evaluator-disagreement bound, recovering the exhaustive reference optimum in all 70 tested ...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.