REVIEW 1 cited by
Revisiting Human Information Foraging: Adaptations for LLM-based Chatbots
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Information Foraging Theory's (IFT) framing of human information seeking choices as decision-theoretic cost-value judgments has successfully explained how people seek information among linked patches of information (e.g., linked webpages). However, the theory has to be adopted and validated in non-patchy LLM-based chatbot environments, before its postulates can be reliably applied to the design of such chat-based information seeking environments. This paper is a thought experiment that applies the IFT cost-value proposition to LLM-based chatbots and presents a set of preliminary hypotheses to guide future theory-building efforts for how people seek information in such environments.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
From Prompts to Propositions: A Logic-Based Lens on Student-LLM Interactions
Prompt2Constraints converts student prompts into logical constraints, revealing that struggling students change their prompts more drastically, which could enable scalable detection of when learners need help.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.