Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Measuring Fairness in Large-Scale Recommendation Systems with Missing Labels

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.05247 v1 pith:MNHCCGDS submitted 2024-06-07 cs.IR

classification cs.IR
keywords fairnesslabelsmissingrecommendationdatalarge-scalemetricssystems
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In large-scale recommendation systems, the vast array of items makes it infeasible to obtain accurate user preferences for each product, resulting in a common issue of missing labels. Typically, only items previously recommended to users have associated ground truth data. Although there is extensive research on fairness concerning fully observed user-item interactions, the challenge of fairness in scenarios with missing labels remains underexplored. Previous methods often treat these samples missing labels as negative, which can significantly deviate from the ground truth fairness metrics. Our study addresses this gap by proposing a novel method employing a small randomized traffic to estimate fairness metrics accurately. We present theoretical bounds for the estimation error of our fairness metric and support our findings with empirical evidence on real data. Our numerical experiments on synthetic and TikTok's real-world data validate our theory and show the efficiency and effectiveness of our novel methods. To the best of our knowledge, we are the first to emphasize the necessity of random traffic in dataset collection for recommendation fairness, the first to publish a fairness-related dataset from TikTok and to provide reliable estimates of fairness metrics in the context of large-scale recommendation systems with missing labels.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools