REVIEW 1 cited by
Iterated Schr\"odinger bridge approximation to Wasserstein Gradient Flows
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
We introduce a novel discretization scheme for Wasserstein gradient flows that involves successively computing Schr\"{o}dinger bridges with the same marginals. This is different from both the forward/geodesic approximation and the backward/Jordan-Kinderlehrer-Otto (JKO) approximations. The proposed scheme has two advantages: one, it avoids the use of the score function, and, two, it is amenable to particle-based approximations using the Sinkhorn algorithm. Our proof hinges upon showing that relative entropy between the Schr\"{o}dinger bridge with the same marginals at temperature $\epsilon$ and the joint distribution of a stationary Langevin diffusion at times zero and $\epsilon$ is of the order $o(\epsilon^2)$ with an explicit dependence given by Fisher information. Owing to this inequality, we can show, using a triangular approximation argument, that the interpolated iterated application of the Schr\"{o}dinger bridge approximation converge to the Wasserstein gradient flow, for a class of gradient flows, including the heat flow. The results also provide a probabilistic and rigorous framework for the convergence of the self-attention mechanisms in transformer networks to the solutions of heat flows, first observed in the inspiring work SABP22 in machine learning research.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Convergence Rate of the Solution of Multi-marginal Schrodinger Bridge Problem with Marginal Constraints from SDEs
When the m marginal constraints are the time-marginals of an SDE with time-dependent drift, the multi-marginal Schrödinger bridge converges to the SDE's law at KL rate O(m^{-1}).
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.