REVIEW 4 cited by
DB-GPT-Hub: Towards Open Benchmarking Text-to-SQL Empowered by Large Language Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Large language models (LLMs) becomes the dominant paradigm for the challenging task of text-to-SQL. LLM-empowered text-to-SQL methods are typically categorized into prompting-based and tuning approaches. Compared to prompting-based methods, benchmarking fine-tuned LLMs for text-to-SQL is important yet under-explored, partially attributed to the prohibitively high computational cost. In this paper, we present DB-GPT-Hub, an open benchmark suite for LLM-empowered text-to-SQL, which primarily focuses on tuning LLMs at large scales. The proposed benchmark consists of: 1. a standardized and comprehensive evaluation of text-to-SQL tasks by fine-tuning medium to large-sized open LLMs; 2. a modularized and easy-to-extend codebase with mainstream LLMs and experimental scenarios supported, which prioritizes fine-tuning methods but can be easily extended to prompt-based setting. Our work investigates the potential gains and the performance boundaries of tuning approaches, compared to prompting approaches and explores optimal solutions tailored to specific scenarios. We hope DB-GPT-Hub, along with these findings, enables further research and broad applications that would otherwise be difficult owing to the absence of a dedicated open benchmark. The project code has been released at https://github.com/eosphoros-ai/DB-GPT-Hub.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
Benchmarking Text-to-SQL under Role-Based Access Control
RBAC-augmented versions of Spider, BIRD, and LiveSQLBench show many text-to-SQL models, open-weight ones especially, frequently emit unauthorized SQL despite high unrestricted-execution scores.
-
Is Long Context All You Need? Leveraging LLM's Extended Context for NL2SQL
Feeding Gemini 1.5 a long context with all tables, sample column values, hints, and many synthetic examples reaches 67.41% execution accuracy on BIRD dev without fine-tuning or self-consistency.
-
Exploring the Landscape of Text-to-SQL with Large Language Models: Progresses, Challenges and Opportunities
A systematic review organizing LLM-based text-to-SQL methods into pre-processing, in-context learning, fine-tuning, and post-processing paradigms, with a catalog of datasets, metrics, challenges, and future directions.
-
ROMAS: A Role-Based Multi-Agent System for Database monitoring and Planning
A role-based multi-agent framework with a monitor that triggers re-planning is reported to outperform other LLM agent systems on two QA benchmarks, but no code, data, or error bars are provided.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.