Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

DB-GPT-Hub: Towards Open Benchmarking Text-to-SQL Empowered by Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.11434 v1 pith:7CLBF52S submitted 2024-06-17 cs.DB

classification cs.DB
keywords text-to-sqlllmsdb-gpt-hubopenapproachesbenchmarklargemethods
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large language models (LLMs) becomes the dominant paradigm for the challenging task of text-to-SQL. LLM-empowered text-to-SQL methods are typically categorized into prompting-based and tuning approaches. Compared to prompting-based methods, benchmarking fine-tuned LLMs for text-to-SQL is important yet under-explored, partially attributed to the prohibitively high computational cost. In this paper, we present DB-GPT-Hub, an open benchmark suite for LLM-empowered text-to-SQL, which primarily focuses on tuning LLMs at large scales. The proposed benchmark consists of: 1. a standardized and comprehensive evaluation of text-to-SQL tasks by fine-tuning medium to large-sized open LLMs; 2. a modularized and easy-to-extend codebase with mainstream LLMs and experimental scenarios supported, which prioritizes fine-tuning methods but can be easily extended to prompt-based setting. Our work investigates the potential gains and the performance boundaries of tuning approaches, compared to prompting approaches and explores optimal solutions tailored to specific scenarios. We hope DB-GPT-Hub, along with these findings, enables further research and broad applications that would otherwise be difficult owing to the absence of a dedicated open benchmark. The project code has been released at https://github.com/eosphoros-ai/DB-GPT-Hub.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Benchmarking Text-to-SQL under Role-Based Access Control

    cs.DB 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    RBAC-augmented versions of Spider, BIRD, and LiveSQLBench show many text-to-SQL models, open-weight ones especially, frequently emit unauthorized SQL despite high unrestricted-execution scores.

  2. Is Long Context All You Need? Leveraging LLM's Extended Context for NL2SQL

    cs.DB 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Feeding Gemini 1.5 a long context with all tables, sample column values, hints, and many synthetic examples reaches 67.41% execution accuracy on BIRD dev without fine-tuning or self-consistency.

  3. Exploring the Landscape of Text-to-SQL with Large Language Models: Progresses, Challenges and Opportunities

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A systematic review organizing LLM-based text-to-SQL methods into pre-processing, in-context learning, fine-tuning, and post-processing paradigms, with a catalog of datasets, metrics, challenges, and future directions.

  4. ROMAS: A Role-Based Multi-Agent System for Database monitoring and Planning

    cs.AI 2024-12 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    A role-based multi-agent framework with a monitor that triggers re-planning is reported to outperform other LLM agent systems on two QA benchmarks, but no code, data, or error bars are provided.

Pith tools