Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

Model-Based Inference and Experimental Design for Interference Using Partial Network Data

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.11940 v1 pith:ENWTSOSI submitted 2024-06-17 stat.ME cs.SIecon.EMstat.MLstat.OT

classification stat.MEcs.SIecon.EMstat.MLstat.OT
keywords networkdatatreatmenteffectmanypartialadjustmentsapplications
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The stable unit treatment value assumption states that the outcome of an individual is not affected by the treatment statuses of others, however in many real world applications, treatments can have an effect on many others beyond the immediately treated. Interference can generically be thought of as mediated through some network structure. In many empirically relevant situations however, complete network data (required to adjust for these spillover effects) are too costly or logistically infeasible to collect. Partially or indirectly observed network data (e.g., subsamples, aggregated relational data (ARD), egocentric sampling, or respondent-driven sampling) reduce the logistical and financial burden of collecting network data, but the statistical properties of treatment effect adjustments from these design strategies are only beginning to be explored. In this paper, we present a framework for the estimation and inference of treatment effect adjustments using partial network data through the lens of structural causal models. We also illustrate procedures to assign treatments using only partial network data, with the goal of either minimizing estimator variance or optimally seeding. We derive single network asymptotic results applicable to a variety of choices for an underlying graph model. We validate our approach using simulated experiments on observed graphs with applications to information diffusion in India and Malawi.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Network-Adjusted GMM Estimation under Network Uncertainty

    econ.EM 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    NA-GMM jointly estimates parameters and penalized network corrections, converging to a pseudo-true value with asymptotic normality and worst-case bias reduction relative to naive GMM in linear SAR models.

  2. Learning What to Learn: Experimental Design when Combining Experimental with Observational Evidence

    econ.EM 2025-10 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Designing experiments that will be combined with observational evidence reduces to balancing a normalized variance regret against a normalized bias regret.

  3. Estimating Peer Effects Using Partial Network Data

    econ.EM 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new SGMM and a Bayesian estimator recover peer effects from partially observed networks, and show that Add Health data errors bias the estimated peer effect downward by roughly a third.

  4. Identifiability and Information-Based Inference for Epidemic Transmission Models Under Partial Observation

    math.ST 2026-07 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    Partial observation regimes determine which epidemic-network parameters are identifiable, and a missing-information decomposition quantifies the loss, with transmission and external infection confounded when exposure ...

  5. Experimenting with Networks

    econ.GN 2025-06 unverdicted novelty 1.0 of 10

    A survey of methods for network experiments, centered on exposure maps, identification and power, data collection, and design trade-offs across lab, field, and natural settings.

Pith tools