pith. sign in

arxiv: 2406.15671 · v2 · submitted 2024-06-21 · ⚛️ physics.app-ph

Detection of low-energy fluxons from engineered long Josephson junctions for efficient computing

Han Cai , Liuqi Yu , Waltraut Wustmann , Ryan Clarke , Kevin D. Osborn This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 00:17 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.app-ph
keywords single-flux quantumlong Josephson junctionballistic propagationJosephson junction arraySFQ detectorsuperconducting logiclow-energy fluxon
0
0 comments X

The pith

Engineered long Josephson junctions allow launch and detection of low-energy single-flux quanta with synchronous timing.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that single-flux quantum pulses with stationary energy of about 47 zJ can be launched into a long Josephson junction formed by an array of 80 small critical-current junctions and detected at the far end. Measurements performed at both 4.2 K and 3.5 K show clear timing correlations between launch and detection events. The extracted jitter is attributed mainly to detector noise, and calculations indicate the fluxon may cross the junction ballistically with only small velocity change. A sympathetic reader would care because the result supplies an experimental building block for superconducting circuits that rely on ballistic and reversible principles rather than conventional dissipative switching.

Core claim

We launch low-energy SFQ into engineered long JJs made from an array of 80 JJs and connecting inductors with critical currents of only 7.5 uA such that the Josephson penetration depth is approximately 2.4 unit cells and the SFQ stationary energy is ~47 zJ. The circuit consists of an SFQ launcher, the LJJ, and an SFQ detector using 15-20 uA critical currents. Data show that SFQ detection events are synchronous with SFQ launch events in both 4.2 K helium dunk probe and 3.5 K cryogen-free refrigerator setups. The jitter extracted from launch and arrival times is predominantly attributed to the noise in the detector. This demonstrates creation and detection of low-energy SFQs in engineered LJJs.

What carries the argument

The engineered long Josephson junction array of 80 junctions that supports ballistic propagation of the low-energy SFQ with only small velocity change.

If this is right

  • Synchronous detection events confirm that the SFQ can traverse the LJJ ballistically.
  • Jitter being dominated by detector noise sets a practical limit for future ballistic gate timing measurements.
  • The same circuit functions in both liquid-helium and cryogen-free environments.
  • Low-energy SFQs of ~47 zJ become available as a resource for reversible or ballistic SFQ logic gates.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the propagation is truly ballistic, the structure could serve as a testbed for full reversible logic gates with minimal energy dissipation per operation.
  • Reducing detector noise would allow direct extraction of the SFQ velocity inside the LJJ.
  • The same array geometry might be adapted to other superconducting circuits that need low-energy fluxon transport.

Load-bearing premise

The observed timing correlations between launch and detection arise from the SFQ propagating through the long Josephson junction rather than from direct electromagnetic coupling or other circuit artifacts between launcher and detector.

What would settle it

Repeating the measurement after physically separating the launcher and detector or adding shielding that blocks electromagnetic crosstalk while leaving the LJJ path intact, and finding that synchrony disappears, would falsify the ballistic-propagation interpretation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2406.15671 by Han Cai, Kevin D. Osborn, Liuqi Yu, Ryan Clarke, Waltraut Wustmann.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Engineered LJJ test circuit. (A) The circuit diagram shows the DC/SFQ launcher, the LJJ, and the SFQ detector. The LJJ is composed of an array [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: A reference DC/SFQ and SFQ/DC converter circuit without LJJs. (A) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: LJJ test-circuit data taken with the CFR setup, shown with the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: (A, B) Time delay distribution (jitter) generated from input and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: SQUID test data taken with the DP setup. (A) Optical photograph [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Eye diagram data captured on an oscilloscope in the CFR setup. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: The extracted jitter for low-energy fluxon transmission in the dunk [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_9.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Single-Flux Quantum (SFQ) digital logic is typically energy efficient and fast, and logic that uses ballistic and reversible principles provides a new platform to improve efficiency. We are studying long Josephson junctions (long JJs), SFQs within them, and an SFQ detector, all intended for future ballistic logic gate experiments. Specifically, we launch low-energy SFQ into engineered long JJs made from an array of 80 JJs and connecting inductors. The component JJs have critical currents of only 7.5 uA such that the Josephson penetration depth is approximately 2.4 unit cells, and the SFQ's stationary energy in the LJJ is ~47 zJ. The circuit measured consisted of three components: an SFQ launcher, the LJJ, and an SFQ detector that uses JJ critical currents of only 15-20 uA. The circuit was measured in two environments: at 4.2 K in a helium dunk probe and 3.5~K in a cryogen-free refrigerator. According to calculations, the SFQ may traverse the LJJ ballistically, i.e., with a small change in velocity. Data show that SFQ detection events are synchronous with SFQ launch events in both setups. The jitter extracted from the launch and arrival times is predominantly attributed to the noise in the detector. This study shows that we can create and detect low-energy SFQs made from engineered LJJs, and the importance of jitter studies for future ballistic gate measurements.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports an experimental demonstration of launching low-energy single-flux quanta (SFQs, ~47 zJ) into an engineered long Josephson junction (LJJ) array of 80 junctions with 7.5 µA critical current and detecting them with a separate SFQ detector (15-20 µA junctions). Synchronous launch-detection events are observed at both 4.2 K and 3.5 K and are interpreted as evidence of ballistic SFQ propagation through the LJJ, with extracted jitter attributed primarily to detector noise. The work positions this as a step toward ballistic and reversible SFQ logic.

Significance. If the ballistic-propagation interpretation is confirmed by controls, the result would establish a platform for creating and detecting very-low-energy SFQs in LJJs, directly relevant to energy-efficient ballistic logic. The focus on jitter characterization is a useful methodological contribution for future gate experiments. The experimental approach (small-Jc junctions, two-temperature setups) is technically sound in principle.

major comments (2)
  1. [Results and Discussion (implicit in abstract description of data)] The central claim that observed timing correlations demonstrate ballistic SFQ traversal through the LJJ (rather than direct EM coupling, inductive crosstalk, or shared bias lines) rests on an untested assumption. No control measurements are described—such as LJJ removal, bias-off state, or replacement by a non-propagating structure—to falsify the artifact hypothesis. This issue is load-bearing for the interpretation of synchronous events at both 4.2 K and 3.5 K.
  2. [Abstract and Results] The abstract states that 'SFQ detection events are synchronous with SFQ launch events' and that 'jitter ... is predominantly attributed to the noise in the detector,' yet provides no error bars, statistical significance tests, raw timing histograms, or quantitative comparison of jitter sources. These omissions weaken the evidential basis for the ballistic claim and the jitter attribution.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Introduction/Methods] The Josephson penetration depth is stated as 'approximately 2.4 unit cells'; clarify whether this is calculated from the given 7.5 µA critical current and inductor values or measured.
  2. [Circuit Description] The manuscript would benefit from a schematic or circuit diagram explicitly labeling launcher, LJJ array, and detector, including bias and readout lines, to aid assessment of possible crosstalk paths.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful review and for recognizing the potential relevance of low-energy SFQ experiments in long Josephson junctions. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript to improve the evidential basis for the ballistic-propagation interpretation.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Results and Discussion (implicit in abstract description of data)] The central claim that observed timing correlations demonstrate ballistic SFQ traversal through the LJJ (rather than direct EM coupling, inductive crosstalk, or shared bias lines) rests on an untested assumption. No control measurements are described—such as LJJ removal, bias-off state, or replacement by a non-propagating structure—to falsify the artifact hypothesis. This issue is load-bearing for the interpretation of synchronous events at both 4.2 K and 3.5 K.

    Authors: We agree that the manuscript does not describe explicit control experiments (e.g., bias-off states or non-propagating structures) that would directly falsify electromagnetic coupling or crosstalk. The present interpretation rests on the circuit topology (separate launcher, LJJ array, and detector) and the persistence of synchronous events across two distinct cryogenic environments. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated subsection in Results and Discussion that quantifies expected crosstalk levels from layout and bias-line design, presents any available bias-off timing data, and explicitly states the assumptions underlying the ballistic claim. Physical removal of the LJJ is not feasible on the existing chip, but the added analysis will make the evidential limitations transparent. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Abstract and Results] The abstract states that 'SFQ detection events are synchronous with SFQ launch events' and that 'jitter ... is predominantly attributed to the noise in the detector,' yet provides no error bars, statistical significance tests, raw timing histograms, or quantitative comparison of jitter sources. These omissions weaken the evidential basis for the ballistic claim and the jitter attribution.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the current abstract and main text lack error bars, statistical tests, raw histograms, and a quantitative jitter budget. The manuscript contains timing data from which these quantities can be derived. In the revised version we will (i) expand the abstract to note the presence of timing histograms and jitter analysis, (ii) add error bars and significance metrics to all reported timing correlations, (iii) include raw and processed timing histograms in the main text or supplementary material, and (iv) provide a quantitative comparison of measured jitter against modeled detector noise and other sources. These additions will directly support the jitter attribution and the synchrony claim. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; purely experimental report with direct measurements

full rationale

The manuscript reports experimental observations of synchronous SFQ launch and detection events across two temperature setups, with jitter attributed to detector noise. No derivation chain, fitted-parameter predictions, self-citation load-bearing steps, or ansatz smuggling appears in the abstract or described content. The timing correlation is presented as a measured datum against an external trigger, externally falsifiable by the experiment itself. This matches the default expectation of a non-circular experimental paper.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The claim rests on standard superconducting circuit physics (Josephson relations, flux quantization) plus the modeling assumption that the SFQ velocity change is small; no new entities or ad-hoc parameters are introduced beyond the measured critical currents.

axioms (2)
  • standard math Standard Josephson junction equations and flux quantization hold for the fabricated devices.
    Invoked implicitly when calculating SFQ energy and penetration depth from critical currents.
  • domain assumption The observed voltage pulses correspond one-to-one to SFQ events rather than other electromagnetic transients.
    Required to interpret synchronous launcher-detector events as ballistic propagation.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5818 in / 1350 out tokens · 23774 ms · 2026-05-24T00:17:14.788710+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

33 extracted references · 33 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    and Morrison, J., 2011

    Shalf, J., Dosanjh, S. and Morrison, J., 2011. Exascale computing tech- nology challenges. In High Performance Computing for Computational Science–VECPAR 2010: 9th International conference, Berkeley, CA, USA, June 22-25, 2010, Revised Selected Papers 9 (pp. 1-25). Springer Berlin Heidelberg

    work page 2011

  2. [2]

    Energy-efficient single flux quantum technology

    Mukhanov OA. Energy-efficient single flux quantum technology. IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity. 2011 Jan 6;21(3):760-9

    work page 2011

  3. [3]

    Reversible fluxon logic: Topological particles allow ballistic gates along one-dimensional paths

    Wustmann W, Osborn KD. Reversible fluxon logic: Topological particles allow ballistic gates along one-dimensional paths. Physical Review B. 2020 Jan 1;101(1):014516

    work page 2020

  4. [4]

    Asynchronous ballistic reversible computing

    Frank MP. Asynchronous ballistic reversible computing. In2017 IEEE International Conference on Rebooting Computing (ICRC) 2017 Nov 8 (pp. 1-8). IEEE

    work page 2017

  5. [5]

    NIST 10 V programmable Josephson voltage stan- dard system

    Burroughs CJ, Dresselhaus PD, Rufenacht A, Olaya D, Elsbury MM, Tang YH, Benz SP. NIST 10 V programmable Josephson voltage stan- dard system. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement. 2011 Jan 13;60(7):2482-8

    work page 2011

  6. [6]

    1 GHz waveform synthesis with Josephson junction arrays

    Donnelly CA, Flowers-Jacobs NE, Brevik JA, Fox AE, Dresselhaus PD, Hopkins PF, Benz SP. 1 GHz waveform synthesis with Josephson junction arrays. IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity. 2019 Jul 31;30(3):1-1

    work page 2019

  7. [7]

    Microwave receivers with direct digitization

    Kirichenko DE, Filippov TV , Gupta D. Microwave receivers with direct digitization. In 2009 IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium Digest 2009 Jun 7 (pp. 1449-1452). IEEE

    work page 2009

  8. [8]

    Josephson junction simulation of neurons

    Crotty P, Schult D, Segall K. Josephson junction simulation of neurons. Physical Review E—Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics. 2010 Jul;82(1):011914

    work page 2010

  9. [9]

    SuperMind: a survey of the potential of superconducting electronics for neuromorphic computing

    Schneider M, Toomey E, Rowlands G, Shainline J, Tschirhart P, Segall K. SuperMind: a survey of the potential of superconducting electronics for neuromorphic computing. Superconductor Science and Technology. 2022 Mar 30;35(5):053001

    work page 2022

  10. [10]

    High-speed demonstration of single-flux-quantum cross-bar switch up to 50 GHz

    Kameda Y , Yorozu S, Hashimoto Y , Terai H, Fujimaki A, Yoshikawa N. High-speed demonstration of single-flux-quantum cross-bar switch up to 50 GHz. IEEE transactions on applied superconductivity. 2005 Mar 14;15(1):6-10

    work page 2005

  11. [11]

    Low- power digital readout circuit for superconductor nanowire single-photon detectors

    Sahu A, Celik ME, Kirichenko DE, Filippov TV , Gupta D. Low- power digital readout circuit for superconductor nanowire single-photon detectors. IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity. 2019 Mar 7;29(5):1-6

    work page 2019

  12. [12]

    Single-flux-quantum circuit based readout system for detector arrays by using time to digital conversion

    Bozbey A, Miyajima S, Akaike H, Fujimaki A. Single-flux-quantum circuit based readout system for detector arrays by using time to digital conversion. IEEE transactions on applied superconductivity. 2009 Jun 30;19(3):509-13

    work page 2009

  13. [13]

    Digital coherent control of a superconducting qubit

    Leonard Jr E, Beck MA, Nelson J, Christensen BG, Thorbeck T, Howington C, Opremcak A, Pechenezhskiy IV , Dodge K, Dupuis NP, Hutchings MD. Digital coherent control of a superconducting qubit. Physical Review Applied. 2019 Jan 1;11(1):014009

    work page 2019

  14. [14]

    Accurate qubit control with single flux quantum pulses

    McDermott R, Vavilov MG. Accurate qubit control with single flux quantum pulses. Physical Review Applied. 2014 Jul 1;2(1):014007

    work page 2014

  15. [15]

    18-GHz, 4.0- aJ/bit operation of ultra-low-energy rapid single-flux-quantum shift reg- isters

    Tanaka M, Ito M, Kitayama A, Kouketsu T, Fujimaki A. 18-GHz, 4.0- aJ/bit operation of ultra-low-energy rapid single-flux-quantum shift reg- isters. Japanese Journal of Applied Physics. 2012 May 7;51(5R):053102

    work page 2012

  16. [16]

    Ultra-low-power supercon- ductor logic

    Herr QP, Herr AY , Oberg OT, Ioannidis AG. Ultra-low-power supercon- ductor logic. Journal of applied physics. 2011 May 15;109(10)

    work page 2011

  17. [17]

    Towards 32-bit energy- efficient superconductor RQL processors: The cell-level design and analysis of key processing and on-chip storage units

    Dorojevets M, Chen Z, Ayala CL, Kasperek AK. Towards 32-bit energy- efficient superconductor RQL processors: The cell-level design and analysis of key processing and on-chip storage units. IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity. 2014 Nov 6;25(3):1-8

    work page 2014

  18. [18]

    Zero static power dissipation biasing of RSFQ circuits

    Kirichenko DE, Sarwana S, Kirichenko AF. Zero static power dissipation biasing of RSFQ circuits. IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconduc- tivity. 2011 Jan 13;21(3):776-9

    work page 2011

  19. [19]

    Negative-inductance SQUID as the basic element of reversible Josephson-junction circuits

    Semenov VK, Danilov GV , Averin DV . Negative-inductance SQUID as the basic element of reversible Josephson-junction circuits. IEEE transactions on applied superconductivity. 2003 Jun;13(2):938-43

    work page 2003

  20. [20]

    Measurement of 10 zJ energy dissipation of adiabatic quantum-flux-parametron logic using a super- conducting resonator

    Takeuchi N, Yamanashi Y , Yoshikawa N. Measurement of 10 zJ energy dissipation of adiabatic quantum-flux-parametron logic using a super- conducting resonator. Applied Physics Letters. 2013 Feb 4;102(5)

    work page 2013

  21. [21]

    Progress with physically and logically reversible superconducting digital circuits

    Ren J, Semenov VK. Progress with physically and logically reversible superconducting digital circuits. IEEE transactions on applied supercon- ductivity. 2011 Feb 14;21(3):780-6

    work page 2011

  22. [22]

    MANA: A monolithic adiabatic iNtegration architecture microprocessor using 1.4 zJ/op superconductor Josephson junction devices

    Ayala CL, Tanaka T, Saito R, Nozoe M, Takeuchi N, Yoshikawa N. MANA: A monolithic adiabatic iNtegration architecture microprocessor using 1.4 zJ/op superconductor Josephson junction devices. In2020 IEEE Symposium on VLSI Circuits 2020 Jun 16 (pp. 1-2). IEEE

    work page 2020

  23. [23]

    Thermodynamic study of energy dissipation in adiabatic superconductor logic

    Takeuchi N, Yamanashi Y , Yoshikawa N. Thermodynamic study of energy dissipation in adiabatic superconductor logic. Physical Review Applied. 2015 Sep 1;4(3):034007

    work page 2015

  24. [24]

    Simulation of sub-kBT bit- energy operation of adiabatic quantum-flux-parametron logic with low bit-error-rate

    Takeuchi N, Yamanashi Y , Yoshikawa N. Simulation of sub-kBT bit- energy operation of adiabatic quantum-flux-parametron logic with low bit-error-rate. Applied Physics Letters. 2013 Aug 5;103(6)

    work page 2013

  25. [25]

    Reversible fluxon logic with optimized CNOT gate components

    Osborn KD, Wustmann W. Reversible fluxon logic with optimized CNOT gate components. IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconduc- tivity. 2020 Dec 2;31(2):1-3

    work page 2020

  26. [26]

    Asynchronous reversible computing unveiled using ballistic shift registers

    Osborn KD, Wustmann W. Asynchronous reversible computing unveiled using ballistic shift registers. Physical Review Applied. 2023 May 1;19(5):054034

    work page 2023

  27. [27]

    Asyn- chronous ballistic reversible fluxon logic

    Frank MP, Lewis RM, Missert NA, Wolak MA, Henry MD. Asyn- chronous ballistic reversible fluxon logic. IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity. 2019 Mar 15;29(5):1-7

    work page 2019

  28. [28]

    New RSFQ circuits (Josephson junction digital devices)

    Polonsky SV , Semenov VK, Bunyk PI, Kirichenko AF, Kidiyarov- Shevchenko AY , Mukhanov OA, Shevchenko PN, Schneider DF, Zi- noviev DY , Likharev KK. New RSFQ circuits (Josephson junction digital devices). IEEE transactions on applied superconductivity. 1993 Mar;3(1):2566-77

    work page 1993

  29. [29]

    Resonances between fluxons and plasma waves in underdamped Josephson transmis- sion lines of stripline geometry

    Pfeiffer J, Abdumalikov Jr AA, Schuster M, Ustinov A V . Resonances between fluxons and plasma waves in underdamped Josephson transmis- sion lines of stripline geometry. Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics. 2008 Jan 1;77(2):024511

    work page 2008

  30. [30]

    Experimental designs of ballistic reversible logic gates using fluxons

    Yu L, Wustmann W, Osborn KD. Experimental designs of ballistic reversible logic gates using fluxons. In2019 IEEE International Super- conductive Electronics Conference (ISEC) 2019 Jul 28 (pp. 1-3). IEEE

    work page 2019

  31. [31]

    Field solution for a thin-film superconducting strip trans- mission line

    Swihart JC. Field solution for a thin-film superconducting strip trans- mission line. Journal of Applied Physics. 1961 Mar 1;32(3):461-9

    work page 1961

  32. [32]

    Evidence for hydrogen two-level systems in atomic layer deposition oxides

    Khalil MS, Stoutimore MJ, Gladchenko S, Holder AM, Musgrave CB, Kozen AC, Rubloff G, Liu YQ, Gordon RG, Yum JH, Banerjee SK. Evidence for hydrogen two-level systems in atomic layer deposition oxides. Applied Physics Letters. 2013 Oct 14;103(16)

    work page 2013

  33. [33]

    Reading out the state of a flux qubit by Josephson transmission line solitons

    Fedorov A, Shnirman A, Schön G, Kidiyarova-Shevchenko A. Reading out the state of a flux qubit by Josephson transmission line solitons. Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics. 2007 Jun 1;75(22):224504

    work page 2007