REVIEW 1 cited by
Bayesian Rank-Clustering
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
Traditional statistical inference on ordinal comparison data results in an overall ranking of objects, e.g., from best to worst, with each object having a unique rank. However, ranks of some objects may not be statistically distinguishable. This could happen due to insufficient data or to the true underlying object qualities being equal. Because uncertainty communication in estimates of overall rankings is notoriously difficult, we take a different approach and allow groups of objects to have equal ranks or be $\textit{rank-clustered}$ in our model. Existing models related to rank-clustering are limited by their inability to handle a variety of ordinal data types, to quantify uncertainty, or by the need to pre-specify the number and size of potential rank-clusters. We solve these limitations through our proposed Bayesian $\textit{Rank-Clustered Bradley-Terry-Luce}$ model. We accommodate rank-clustering via parameter fusion by imposing a novel spike-and-slab prior on object-specific worth parameters in Bradley-Terry-Luce family of distributions for ordinal comparisons. We demonstrate rank-clustering on simulated and real datasets in surveys, elections, and sports analytics.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Bayesian Plackett--Luce latent block models for ranked data
A Plackett–Luce latent block model with Gnedin priors co-clusters assessors and items into a shared C×K strength table, with conjugate MCMC and a TCGA gene-ranking application.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.