Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Advancing Information Integration through Empirical Likelihood: Selective Reviews and a New Idea

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2407.00561 v1 pith:T6SRQFUC submitted 2024-06-30 stat.ME stat.AP

classification stat.MEstat.AP
keywords informationintegrationstudiesdataempiricalframeworkindependentlikelihood
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Information integration plays a pivotal role in biomedical studies by facilitating the combination and analysis of independent datasets from multiple studies, thereby uncovering valuable insights that might otherwise remain obscured due to the limited sample size in individual studies. However, sharing raw data from independent studies presents significant challenges, primarily due to the need to safeguard sensitive participant information and the cumbersome paperwork involved in data sharing. In this article, we first provide a selective review of recent methodological developments in information integration via empirical likelihood, wherein only summary information is required, rather than the raw data. Following this, we introduce a new insight and a potentially promising framework that could broaden the application of information integration across a wider spectrum. Furthermore, this new framework offers computational convenience compared to classic empirical likelihood-based methods. We provide numerical evaluations to assess its performance and discuss various extensions in the end.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools