Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 1 minor 85 references

Advancing Remote Medical Palpation through Cognition and Emotion

T0 review · 2 major / 1 minor · reviewed 2026-05-23 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Medical palpation requires modeling both active doctor touch and passive patient emotional response, as a mixed-reality prototype shows reliable location transmission but variable force perception across individuals.

desk verdict The paper's main empirical result is that location transmits reliably in their prototype but force perception varies between the 14 clinicians across 391 trials, which they take as evidence that force alone is not enough. read the letter →

arxiv 2407.05595 v3 submitted 2024-07-08 cs.RO

Matti Itkonen , Shotaro Okajima , Sayako Ueda , Alvaro Costa-Garcia , Yang Ningjia , Tadatoshi Kurogi , Takeshi Fujiwara , Shigeru Kurimoto
show 6 more authors
Shintaro Oyama Masaomi Saeki Michiro Yamamoto Hidemasa Yoneda Hitoshi Hirata Shingo Shimoda
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.RO
keywords medicalpalpationtelepalpationmixedrealitytouchpathwaysforceperceptionremotemedicinehapticfeedbackclinicianevaluation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper models palpation as more than force transmission by defining two complementary pathways: the doctor's active kinesthetic and tactile sensing and the patient's passive subjective and emotional experience. Using this model, the authors built and tested a mixed-reality telepalpation system with 14 clinicians in 391 trials. Location information transferred consistently, but force perception differed systematically between people. This finding suggests that remote palpation technology must address individual variations rather than relying solely on force feedback to replicate the full clinical interaction.

What carries the argument

The two complementary touch pathways consisting of active kinesthetic/tactile sensing by the doctor and passive subjective/emotional response by the patient, implemented via a mixed-reality telepalpation prototype.

What would settle it

A follow-up study with the same clinicians using a different force feedback mechanism that eliminates the inter-individual variation in force perception would challenge the claim that force alone is insufficient.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

We model two complementary touch pathways: active touch by the doctor (kinesthetic and tactile) and passive touch by the patient (subjective and emotional). We use this framework to design a mixed-reality telepalpation prototype and evaluate it with 14 experienced clinicians serving as both doctors and patients across 391 trials. Touch location was transmitted reliably across participants, while force perception showed systematic inter-individual variation, suggesting that force alone is insufficient to characterize the palpation experience.

Load-bearing premise

The two touch pathways accurately represent the palpation experience and the prototype transmits these elements without introducing artifacts that cause the observed force variation.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Touch location transmits reliably in the prototype across different clinicians.
  • Force perception exhibits systematic differences between individuals.
  • Force transmission by itself does not fully capture the palpation experience.
  • The bidirectional cognitive and emotional model guides effective design of remote palpation systems.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Systems may need adjustable force feedback to match individual perceptions.
  • Accounting for emotional components could improve patient comfort in telehealth palpation.
  • Similar modeling of subjective pathways might apply to other remote haptic medical procedures.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper claims that medical palpation is a bidirectional cognitive and emotional exchange, modeled via two complementary pathways (active kinesthetic/tactile touch by the doctor and passive subjective/emotional touch by the patient). It describes a mixed-reality telepalpation prototype evaluated with 14 experienced clinicians (serving in both roles) across 391 trials, reporting reliable transmission of touch location but systematic inter-individual variation in force perception, and concludes that force alone is insufficient to characterize the palpation experience.

Significance. If the empirical results hold after addressing validation gaps, the work could inform the design of remote palpation systems by highlighting the need to incorporate subjective and emotional factors, moving beyond purely force-based approaches in telemedical robotics. The choice to have clinicians act as both doctors and patients strengthens ecological validity for the target application.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The central claim rests on 391 trials showing reliable location transmission but systematic force-perception differences across 14 clinicians. However, the manuscript provides no details on statistical methods, controls, error bars, exclusion criteria, intra- vs. inter-subject variance decomposition, or quantitative checks (e.g., force-sensor ground truth vs. perceived force) that would rule out prototype artifacts such as per-user actuator response, latency, or calibration differences. This directly undermines the conclusion that force alone is insufficient, as technical factors in the mixed-reality conduit could produce the reported variation without requiring the two-pathway cognitive/emotional model.
  2. [Experimental evaluation] Experimental evaluation: The assumption that the prototype faithfully transmits the passive (patient) pathway without introducing artifacts is load-bearing for interpreting the force variation as evidence against force sufficiency. No ground-truth comparisons or artifact checks are described to support this.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: Consider adding one sentence on the specific quantitative criteria used to determine that location was 'transmitted reliably' versus force showing 'systematic' variation.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments highlighting the need for greater statistical transparency and validation of the prototype. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate additional details on methods, controls, and artifact checks.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The central claim rests on 391 trials showing reliable location transmission but systematic force-perception differences across 14 clinicians. However, the manuscript provides no details on statistical methods, controls, error bars, exclusion criteria, intra- vs. inter-subject variance decomposition, or quantitative checks (e.g., force-sensor ground truth vs. perceived force) that would rule out prototype artifacts such as per-user actuator response, latency, or calibration differences. This directly undermines the conclusion that force alone is insufficient, as technical factors in the mixed-reality conduit could produce the reported variation without requiring the two-pathway cognitive/emotional model.

    Authors: We agree that the manuscript would benefit from explicit reporting of statistical methods and controls. In revision we will add a dedicated subsection detailing the statistical tests performed, error bars, exclusion criteria, intra- versus inter-subject variance decomposition, and any quantitative sensor-versus-perception comparisons that were collected. These additions will allow readers to evaluate whether technical factors could account for the observed force variation. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Experimental evaluation] Experimental evaluation: The assumption that the prototype faithfully transmits the passive (patient) pathway without introducing artifacts is load-bearing for interpreting the force variation as evidence against force sufficiency. No ground-truth comparisons or artifact checks are described to support this.

    Authors: We acknowledge that ground-truth validation of the prototype is essential for the interpretation offered. The revised manuscript will include a new subsection describing available sensor calibrations, latency measurements, and any actuator-response checks performed during the study. This will directly address concerns about potential artifacts in the mixed-reality conduit. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity; central claim rests on independent experimental outcomes

full rationale

The paper introduces a two-pathway model as a design framework for a mixed-reality prototype, then reports empirical results from 391 trials across 14 clinicians. The key finding (reliable location transmission, systematic force-perception variation) is presented as an outcome of those trials rather than a quantity derived by construction from the model itself. No equations, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, self-citation load-bearing steps, or uniqueness theorems appear in the provided text. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 1 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces a domain model of bidirectional touch pathways as the basis for the prototype; no free parameters, invented entities, or prior independent evidence for the model are mentioned in the abstract.

assumptions (1)
  • domain assumption Medical palpation consists of active touch by the doctor (kinesthetic and tactile) and passive touch by the patient (subjective and emotional).
    This modeling choice structures the entire prototype design and evaluation.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Advancing Remote Medical Palpation through Cognition and Emotion." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2407.05595

@misc{pith2026240705595,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Advancing Remote Medical Palpation through Cognition and Emotion},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2407.05595}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2407.05595}
}
read the original abstract

Medical palpation is more than force transmission. It is a bidirectional cognitive and emotional exchange between doctor and patient. We model two complementary touch pathways: active touch by the doctor (kinesthetic and tactile) and passive touch by the patient (subjective and emotional). We use this framework to design a mixed-reality telepalpation prototype and evaluate it with 14 experienced clinicians serving as both doctors and patients across 391 trials. Touch location was transmitted reliably across participants, while force perception showed systematic inter-individual variation, suggesting that force alone is insufficient to characterize the palpation experience.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2407.05595 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Signal pathways for perception during palpation: Active touch represents the doctor’s perception pathway, where direct interaction with the patient [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Telecommunication-vased palpation setup: mixed-reality interaction for remote diagnosis. a) Doctor’s Environment – The doctor wears a VR headset [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

85 extracted references · 85 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Telemedicine for healthcare: Capabilities, features, barriers, and applications,

    A. Haleem, M. Javaid, R. P. Singh, and R. Suman, “Telemedicine for healthcare: Capabilities, features, barriers, and applications,” Sensors International, vol. 2, p. 100117, Jan. 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666351121000383

    work page 2021

  2. [2]

    L. M. Willis, Health Assessment Made Incredibly Visual!, 3e. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, a Wolters Kluwer bu, 01 2017

    work page 2017

  3. [3]

    For- mation of supermassive black holes by direct col- lapse in pregalactic halos,

    H. S. Barrows and P. J. Feltovich, “The clinical reasoning process,” Medical Education , vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 86–91, 1987, eprint: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1365- 2923.1987.tb00671.x. [Online]. Available: https://onlinelibrary.wiley. com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1365-2923.1987.tb00671.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365- 1987

  4. [4]

    Telemedicine and doctor-patient communication: an analytical survey of the literature,

    E. A. Miller, “Telemedicine and doctor-patient communication: an analytical survey of the literature,”Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–17, 2001

    work page 2001

  5. [5]

    Physical signs in dermatology, 2nd edition,

    C. N. Lawrence CM, “Physical signs in dermatology, 2nd edition,” London: Mosby, 2002

    work page 2002

  6. [6]

    Diagnosis of skin disease, rook’s textbook of dermatol- ogy, 7th edn,

    C. I. Cox NH, “Diagnosis of skin disease, rook’s textbook of dermatol- ogy, 7th edn,” Oxford: Blackwell Science , 2004

    work page 2004

  7. [7]

    The importance of palpation in the skin cancer screening examination,

    V . N. Gorman BG, Hanson J, “The importance of palpation in the skin cancer screening examination,” J Cosmet Dermatol , vol. 20, no. 12, pp. 3982–3985, 2021

    work page 2021

  8. [8]

    Patient Perspectives on Telemedicine During the COVID-19 Pandemic,

    F. Ahmad, R. W. Wysocki, J. J. Fernandez, M. S. Cohen, and X. C. Simcock, “Patient Perspectives on Telemedicine During the COVID-19 Pandemic,” HAND, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 522–526, May 2023, publisher: SAGE Publications Inc. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1177/15589447211030692

    work page doi:10.1177/15589447211030692 2023

Show all 85 references
  1. [9]

    Beliefs and Use of Palpatory Findings in Osteopathic Clinical Practice: A Qualitative Descriptive Study among Italian Osteopaths,

    A. Bergna, M. Galli, F. Todisco, and F. Berti, “Beliefs and Use of Palpatory Findings in Osteopathic Clinical Practice: A Qualitative Descriptive Study among Italian Osteopaths,” Healthcare, vol. 10, no. 9, p. 1647, Aug. 2022. [Online]. Available: https: //www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov...

    2022

  2. [10]

    The cutaneous sensory system,

    F. McGlone and D. Reilly, “The cutaneous sensory system,” Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews , vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 148–159, Feb. 2010. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ article/pii/S014976340900116X

    2010

  3. [11]

    The neurophysiology of unmyelinated tactile afferents,

    H. Olausson, J. Wessberg, I. Morrison, F. McGlone, and ˚A. Vallbo, “The neurophysiology of unmyelinated tactile afferents,” Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews , vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 185–191, Feb. 2010. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ S0...

    2010

  4. [12]

    Neural Basis of Touch and Proprioception in Primate Cortex,

    B. P. Delhaye, K. H. Long, and S. J. Bensmaia, “Neural Basis of Touch and Proprioception in Primate Cortex,” Comprehensive Physiology, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 1575–1602, Sep. 2018. [Online]. Available: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6330897/

    2018

  5. [13]

    A reassessment of the role of joint receptors in human position sense,

    U. Proske, “A reassessment of the role of joint receptors in human position sense,” Experimental Brain Research , vol. 241, no. 4, pp. 943–949, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/ articles/PMC10082099/

    2023

  6. [14]

    Elbow proprioception is normal in patients with a congenital absence of functional muscle spindles,

    L. Smith, L. Norcliffe-Kaufmann, J.-A. Palma, H. Kaufmann, and V . G. Macefield, “Elbow proprioception is normal in patients with a congenital absence of functional muscle spindles,” The Journal of Physiology , vol. 598, no. 16, pp. 3521–3529, 2020, eprint: https://onlinelibra...

    2020 doi

  7. [15]

    Haptic Technology: A comprehensive review on its applications and future prospects,

    M. Sreelakshmi and T. D. Subash, “Haptic Technology: A comprehensive review on its applications and future prospects,” Materials Today: Proceedings , vol. 4, no. 2, Part B, pp. 4182–4187, Jan. 2017. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221478...

    2017

  8. [16]

    The Emerging Science of Interoception: Sensing, Integrating, Interpreting, and Regulating Signals within the Self,

    W. G. Chen, D. Schloesser, A. M. Arensdorf, J. M. Simmons, C. Cui, R. Valentino, J. W. Gnadt, L. Nielsen, C. S. Hillaire-Clarke, V . Spruance, T. S. Horowitz, Y . F. Vallejo, and H. M. Langevin, “The Emerging Science of Interoception: Sensing, Integrating, Interpreting, and Re...

    2021

  9. [17]

    The Role of the Skin in Interoception: A Neglected Organ?

    L. Crucianelli and H. H. Ehrsson, “The Role of the Skin in Interoception: A Neglected Organ?” Perspectives on Psychological Science , vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 224–238, Jan. 2023, publisher: SAGE Publications Inc. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916221094509

    2023 doi

  10. [18]

    Discriminative and Affective Touch: Sensing and Feeling,

    F. McGlone, J. Wessberg, and H. Olausson, “Discriminative and Affective Touch: Sensing and Feeling,” Neuron, vol. 82, no. 4, pp. 737–755, May 2014. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect. com/science/article/pii/S0896627314003870

    2014

  11. [19]

    The science of interpersonal touch: An overview,

    A. Gallace and C. Spence, “The science of interpersonal touch: An overview,” Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews , vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 246–259, Feb. 2010. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect. com/science/article/pii/S0149763408001723

    2010

  12. [20]

    The social role of touch in humans and primates: Behavioural function and neurobiological mechanisms,

    R. I. M. Dunbar, “The social role of touch in humans and primates: Behavioural function and neurobiological mechanisms,” Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews , vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 260–268, Feb. 2010. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ S0149...

    2010

  13. [21]

    Significance of the insula for the evolution of human awareness of feelings from the body,

    A. D. (Bud) Craig, “Significance of the insula for the evolution of human awareness of feelings from the body,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences , vol. 1225, no. 1, pp. 72–82, 2011, eprint: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1749- 6632.2011.05990.x. [O...

    2011 doi

  14. [22]

    Interoception and the origin of feelings: A new synthesis,

    G. B. Carvalho and A. Damasio, “Interoception and the origin of feelings: A new synthesis,” BioEssays, vol. 43, no. 6, p. 2000261, 2021, eprint: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/bies.202000261. [Online]. Available: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002...

    2021 doi

  15. [23]

    Merging the senses into a robust percept,

    M. O. Ernst and H. H. B ¨ulthoff, “Merging the senses into a robust percept,” Trends in Cognitive Sciences , vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 162–169, Apr. 2004. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ article/pii/S1364661304000385

    2004

  16. [24]

    Proprioceptive representations of the hand in somatosensory cortex,

    O. J. Lutz and S. J. Bensmaia, “Proprioceptive representations of the hand in somatosensory cortex,” Current Opinion in Physiology , vol. 21, pp. 9–16, Jun. 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect. com/science/article/pii/S2468867321000511

    2021

  17. [25]

    Neural mechanisms underlying the Rubber Hand Illusion: A systematic review of related neurophysiological studies,

    S. Golaszewski, V . Frey, A. Thomschewski, L. Sebastianelli, V . Versace, L. Saltuari, E. Trinka, and R. Nardone, “Neural mechanisms underlying the Rubber Hand Illusion: A systematic review of related neurophysiological studies,” Brain and Behavior , vol. 11, no. 8, p. e02124,...

    2021 doi

  18. [26]

    The Cutaneous

    F. A. Geldard and C. E. Sherrick, “The Cutaneous ”Rabbit”: A Perceptual Illusion,” Science, vol. 178, no. 4057, pp. 178–179, Oct. 1972, publisher: American Association for the Advancement of Science. [Online]. Available: https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/ science.178.4057.178

    1972

  19. [27]

    Multisensory integration and the body schema: close to hand and within reach,

    A. Maravita, C. Spence, and J. Driver, “Multisensory integration and the body schema: close to hand and within reach,” Current Biology, vol. 13, no. 13, pp. R531–R539, Jul. 2003, publisher: Elsevier. [Online]. Available: https://www.cell.com/current-biology/ abstract/S0960-982...

    2003

  20. [28]

    Observations on active touch

    J. J. Gibson, “Observations on active touch.” Psychological Review , vol. 69, no. 6, pp. 477–491, Nov. 1962. [Online]. Available: http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/h0046962

    1962 doi

  21. [29]

    Extracting object properties through haptic exploration,

    S. J. Lederman and R. L. Klatzky, “Extracting object properties through haptic exploration,” Acta Psychologica , vol. 84, no. 1, pp. 29–40, oct 1993. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ article/pii/0001691893900708

    1993

  22. [30]

    Hand-motion perception by four haptic modes: Active/passive and with/without fingerpad cutaneous sensation,

    Y . NOMURA, S. M. N. S. YUSOH, and R. SAKAMOTO, “Hand-motion perception by four haptic modes: Active/passive and with/without fingerpad cutaneous sensation,” Journal of Advanced Me- chanical Design, Systems, and Manufacturing , vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 560– 575, 2013

    2013

  23. [31]

    The skin as a social organ,

    O. H. Morrison I, L ¨oken LS, “The skin as a social organ,” Exp Brain Res, vol. 204, no. 3, pp. 305–314, 2010

    2010

  24. [32]

    Coding of pleasant touch by unmyelinated afferents in humans,

    L. Loken, J. Wessberg, and I. e. a. Morrison, “Coding of pleasant touch by unmyelinated afferents in humans,” Nat Neurosci, vol. 12, pp. 547– 548, 2009

    2009

  25. [33]

    The neurophysiology of unmyelinated tactile afferents,

    H. Olausson, J. Wessberg, I. Morrison, F. McGlone, and A. Vallbo, “The neurophysiology of unmyelinated tactile afferents,” Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews , vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 185–191, 2010, touch, Temperature, Pain/Itch and Pleasure

    2010

  26. [34]

    K. R. Hammond, Human Judgment and Social Policy: Irreducible Uncertainty, Inevitable Error, Unavoidable Injustice. Oxford University Press, 1996, google-Books-ID: VxRnDAAAQBAJ

    1996

  27. [35]

    Physician eye contact in telemedicine video consultations: A cross-cultural experiment,

    S. Helou, E. El Helou, N. Evans, T. Shigematsu, J. El Helou, M. Kaneko, and K. Kiyono, “Physician eye contact in telemedicine video consultations: A cross-cultural experiment,” International Journal of Medical Informatics, vol. 165, p. 104825, Sep. 2022. [Online]. Available: h...

    2022

  28. [36]

    An analysis of clinical reasoning through a recent and comprehensive approach: the dual- process theory,

    T. Pelaccia, J. Tardif, E. Triby, and B. Charlin, “An analysis of clinical reasoning through a recent and comprehensive approach: the dual- process theory,” Medical Education Online , vol. 16, Mar. 2011

    2011

  29. [37]

    The role of touch in osteopathic practice: A narrative review and integrative hypothesis,

    F. Baroni, N. Ruffini, G. D’Alessandro, G. Consorti, and C. Lunghi, “The role of touch in osteopathic practice: A narrative review and integrative hypothesis,” Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice, vol. 42, p. 101277, Feb. 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.science...

    2021

  30. [38]

    Clinical reasoning—embodied meaning-making in physiotherapy,

    A. Chowdhury and W. S. Bjorbækmo, “Clinical reasoning—embodied meaning-making in physiotherapy,” Physiotherapy Theory and Practice, vol. 33, no. 7, pp. 550–559, Jul. 2017, publisher: Taylor & Francis eprint: https://doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2017.1323360. [Online]. Available: h...

    2017 doi

  31. [39]

    Deictic codes for the embodiment of cognition,

    D. H. Ballard, M. M. Hayhoe, P. K. Pook, and R. P. N. Rao, “Deictic codes for the embodiment of cognition,” Behavioral and Brain Sciences , vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 723–742, Dec. 1997. [Online]. Available: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/ S0140525X97001611/type/jo...

    1997

  32. [40]

    Designing Pedagogically Effective Haptic Systems for Learning: A Review,

    R. Crandall and E. Karado ˘gan, “Designing Pedagogically Effective Haptic Systems for Learning: A Review,” Applied Sciences , vol. 11, no. 14, p. 6245, Jan. 2021, number: 14 Publisher: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute. [Online]. Available: https://www.mdpi.com/ 2...

    2021

  33. [41]

    HAPTIC LEARNING AND HOW IT CAN ENHANCE DIGITAL LEARNING EXPERI- ENCES: AN INNOV ATIVE APPROACH,

    B. D ¨orr, M. Funk, F. Norouzinia, and D. Werth, “HAPTIC LEARNING AND HOW IT CAN ENHANCE DIGITAL LEARNING EXPERI- ENCES: AN INNOV ATIVE APPROACH,” INTED2022 Proceedings , pp. 3909–3917, 2022, conference Name: 16th International Technology, Education and Development Conference ...

    2022

  34. [42]

    Long-Term Memory for Haptically Explored Objects: Fidelity, Durability, Incidental Encoding, and Cross-Modal Transfer,

    F. Hutmacher and C. Kuhbandner, “Long-Term Memory for Haptically Explored Objects: Fidelity, Durability, Incidental Encoding, and Cross-Modal Transfer,” Psychological Science , vol. 29, no. 12, pp. 2031–2038, Dec. 2018, publisher: SAGE Publications Inc. [Online]. Available: ht...

    doi

  35. [43]

    Visual and Haptic Influences on Memory: Age Differences in Recall,

    L. M. Stadtlander Latona D. Murdoch Shawna M. Heiser, “Visual and Haptic Influences on Memory: Age Differences in Recall,”Experimental Aging Research , vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 257–272, Jun. 1998, publisher: Routledge eprint: https://doi.org/10.1080/036107398244247. [Online]. Avail...

    1998 doi

  36. [44]

    Robotic palpation and mechanical property characterization for abnormal tissue localization,

    B. Ahn, Y . Kim, C. K. Oh, and J. Kim, “Robotic palpation and mechanical property characterization for abnormal tissue localization,” Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing , vol. 50, no. 9, pp. 961–971, sep 2012. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/ s11517-012-0936-2

    2012

  37. [45]

    Inclusion detection with haptic- palpation system for medical telediagnosis,

    J. Kim, B. Ahn, Y . Kim, and J. Kim, “Inclusion detection with haptic- palpation system for medical telediagnosis,” in 2009 Annual Interna- tional Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, sep 2009, pp. 4595–4598, iSSN: 1558-4615

    2009

  38. [46]

    Structuring of tactile sensory information for category formation in robotics palpation,

    L. Scimeca, P. Maiolino, E. Bray, and F. Iida, “Structuring of tactile sensory information for category formation in robotics palpation,” Autonomous Robots, vol. 44, no. 8, pp. 1377–1393, nov 2020. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10514-020-09931-y

    2020 doi

  39. [47]

    Wearable Soft Technologies for Haptic Sensing and Feedback,

    J. Yin, R. Hinchet, H. Shea, and C. Majidi, “Wearable Soft Technologies for Haptic Sensing and Feedback,” Advanced Functional Materials , vol. 31, no. 39, p. 2007428, 2021, eprint: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/adfm.202007428. [On- line]. Available: https://o...

    2021 doi

  40. [48]

    A Survey of Mid-Air Ultrasound Haptics and Its Applications,

    I. Rakkolainen, E. Freeman, A. Sand, R. Raisamo, and S. Brewster, “A Survey of Mid-Air Ultrasound Haptics and Its Applications,” IEEE Transactions on Haptics, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 2–19, jan 2021, conference Name: IEEE Transactions on Haptics

    2021

  41. [49]

    Robotic Surgery: A Narrative Review,

    S. Bramhe and S. S. Pathak, “Robotic Surgery: A Narrative Review,” Cureus, vol. 14, no. 9, p. e29179, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9573327/

    2022

  42. [50]

    System Latency Guide- lines Then and Now – Is Zero Latency Really Considered Necessary?

    C. Attig, N. Rauh, T. Franke, and J. F. Krems, “System Latency Guide- lines Then and Now – Is Zero Latency Really Considered Necessary?” in Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics: Cognition and Design, ser. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, D. Harris, Ed. Cham: Sprin...

    2017

  43. [51]

    Prevalence of haptic feedback in robot-mediated surgery: a systematic review of literature,

    F. Amirabdollahian, S. Livatino, B. Vahedi, R. Gudipati, P. Sheen, S. Gawrie-Mohan, and N. Vasdev, “Prevalence of haptic feedback in robot-mediated surgery: a systematic review of literature,” Journal of Robotic Surgery , vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 11–25, Mar. 2018. [Online]. Availab...

    2018 doi

  44. [52]

    Theoretical approach for designing the rehabilitation robot controller,

    S. Okajima, F. S. Alnajjar, M. Hayashibe, Y . Hasegawa, and S. Shimoda, “Theoretical approach for designing the rehabilitation robot controller,” Advanced Robotics, vol. 33, pp. ”674–686”, 2019

    2019

  45. [53]

    Biomechanical reconstruction using the tacit learning system: Intuitive control of prosthetic hand rotation,

    S. Oyama, S. Shimoda, F. S. Alnajjar, K. Iwatsuki, M. Hoshiyama, H. Tanaka, and H. Hirata, “Biomechanical reconstruction using the tacit learning system: Intuitive control of prosthetic hand rotation,” Frontiers in Neurorobotics, vol. 10, 2016

    2016

  46. [54]

    Evaluating Manual Palpation Trajectory Patterns in Tele- manipulation for Soft Tissue Examination,

    J. Konstantinova, M. Li, V . Aminzadeh, K. Althoefer, Thrishantha, and P. Dasgupta, “Evaluating Manual Palpation Trajectory Patterns in Tele- manipulation for Soft Tissue Examination,” in 2013 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics . Manchester: IEEE, O...

    2013

  47. [55]

    Eye movements and the control of actions in everyday life,

    M. F. Land, “Eye movements and the control of actions in everyday life,” Progress in retinal and eye research , vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 296–324, 2006

    2006

  48. [56]

    Quantifying the difference between intention and outcome in driving performance,

    M. Itkonen, S. Shimoda, and T. Kumada, “Quantifying the difference between intention and outcome in driving performance,” Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour, vol. 62, pp. 126–134, 2019

    2019

  49. [57]

    Conversations Over Video Conferences: An Evaluation of the Spoken Aspects of Video-Mediated Communication,

    B. O’Conaill, S. Whittaker, and S. Wilbur, “Conversations Over Video Conferences: An Evaluation of the Spoken Aspects of Video-Mediated Communication,” Human–Computer Interaction , vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 389–428, Dec. 1993. [Online]. Available: http://www.tandfonline.com/ doi/abs/...

    1993 doi

  50. [58]

    Detection of auditory (cross-spectral) and auditory–visual (cross-modal) synchrony,

    K. W. Grant, V . v. Wassenhove, and D. Poeppel, “Detection of auditory (cross-spectral) and auditory–visual (cross-modal) synchrony,” Speech Communication , vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 43–53, Oct. 2004. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ S0167639304001013

    2004

  51. [59]

    Comparisons of Communication in Medical Face-To-Face and Teleconsultations: A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis,

    J. Ford and M. Reuber, “Comparisons of Communication in Medical Face-To-Face and Teleconsultations: A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis,” Health Communication , pp. 1–15, Apr

  52. [60]

    Available: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10

    [Online]. Available: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10. 1080/10410236.2023.2201733

    2023

  53. [61]

    Towards 5g enabled tactile robotic telesurgery,

    Q. Zhang, J. Liu, and G. Zhao, “Towards 5g enabled tactile robotic telesurgery,” Networking and Internet Architecture , 2018

    2018

  54. [62]

    Some basic issues in teletaction,

    R. Fearing, G. Moy, and E. Tan, “Some basic issues in teletaction,” in Proceedings of International Conference on Robotics and Automation , vol. 4, Apr. 1997, pp. 3093–3099 vol.4. [Online]. Available: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/606758

    1997

  55. [63]

    Remote Palpation Technology for Surgical Applications,

    R. D. Howe, W. J. Peine, D. A. Kontarinis, and J. S. Son, “Remote Palpation Technology for Surgical Applications,” IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine , 1995

    1995

  56. [64]

    Tactile feedback for teleoperation,

    M. B. Cohn, M. Lam, and R. S. Fearing, “Tactile feedback for teleoperation,” in Telemanipulator Technology, H. Das, Ed., vol. 1833, International Society for Optics and Photonics. SPIE, 1993, pp. 240 – 254. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1117/12.142113

    1993 doi

  57. [65]

    Tactile rendering with shape-memory-alloy pin-matrix,

    R. Velazquez, E. E. Pissaloux, M. Hafez, and J. Szewczyk, “Tactile rendering with shape-memory-alloy pin-matrix,” IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, vol. 57, no. 5, pp. 1051–1057, 2008

    2008

  58. [66]

    Review on aspects of artificial tactile feedback in laparoscopic surgery,

    S. Schostek, M. O. Schurr, and G. F. Buess, “Review on aspects of artificial tactile feedback in laparoscopic surgery,” Medical Engineering & Physics, vol. 31, no. 8, pp. 887–898, Oct. 2009. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S135045330900126X

    2009

  59. [67]

    Recent Advances in Flexible Tactile Sensors for Intelligent Systems,

    Y . Peng, N. Yang, Q. Xu, Y . Dai, and Z. Wang, “Recent Advances in Flexible Tactile Sensors for Intelligent Systems,” Sensors, vol. 21, no. 16, p. 5392, Jan. 2021, number: 16 Publisher: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute. [Online]. Available: https://www.mdpi.com/...

    2021

  60. [68]

    A Review of Simulators with Haptic Devices for Medical Training,

    D. Escobar-Castillejos, J. Noguez, L. Neri, A. Magana, and B. Benes, “A Review of Simulators with Haptic Devices for Medical Training,” Journal of Medical Systems , vol. 40, no. 4, p. 104, Feb. 2016. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-016-0459-8

    2016 doi

  61. [69]

    Robotic Simulators for Tissue Examination Training With Multimodal Sensory Feedback,

    L. He, P. Maiolino, F. Leong, T. D. Lalitharatne, S. De Lusignan, M. Ghajari, F. Iida, and T. Nanayakkara, “Robotic Simulators for Tissue Examination Training With Multimodal Sensory Feedback,” IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering , vol. 16, pp. 514–529, 2023. [Online]. Avai...

    2023

  62. [70]

    Soft Morphing Interface for Tactile Feedback in Remote Palpation,

    L. Costi, P. Maiolino, and F. Iida, “Soft Morphing Interface for Tactile Feedback in Remote Palpation,” in 2022 IEEE 5th International Con- ference on Soft Robotics (RoboSoft) , Apr. 2022, pp. 01–06

    2022

  63. [71]

    Augmented reality: a class of displays on the reality-virtuality continuum,

    P. Milgram, H. Takemura, A. Utsumi, and F. Kishino, “Augmented reality: a class of displays on the reality-virtuality continuum,” in Telemanipulator and Telepresence Technologies , vol. 2351. SPIE, Dec. 1995, pp. 282–292. [Online]. Available: https://www.spiedigitallibrary.org...

    1995

  64. [72]

    A discussion of cybersickness in virtual environments,

    J. J. LaViola, “A discussion of cybersickness in virtual environments,” ACM SIGCHI Bulletin , vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 47–56, Jan. 2000. [Online]. Available: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/333329.333344

    doi

  65. [73]

    J. T. Reason and J. J. Brand, Motion sickness , ser. Motion sickness. Oxford, England: Academic Press, 1975, pages: vii, 310

    1975

  66. [74]

    Extended Reality for Enhanced Telehealth During and Beyond COVID-19: Viewpoint,

    T. Ong, H. Wilczewski, S. R. Paige, H. Soni, B. M. Welch, and B. E. Bunnell, “Extended Reality for Enhanced Telehealth During and Beyond COVID-19: Viewpoint,” JMIR Serious Games , vol. 9, no. 3, p. e26520, Jul. 2021. [Online]. Available: https: //www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/artic...

    2021

  67. [75]

    Comparing cybersickness in virtual reality and mixed reality head-mounted displays,

    R. Kirollos and W. Merchant, “Comparing cybersickness in virtual reality and mixed reality head-mounted displays,” Frontiers in Virtual Reality, vol. 4, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.frontiersin.org/ articles/10.3389/frvir.2023.1130864

    2023 doi

  68. [76]

    HAPTIC PLASTeR: soft, thin, light and flexible haptic display using DEA composed of slide-ring material for daily life,

    T. Kurogi, Y . Yonehara, R. L. Peiris, T. Fujiwara, and K. Minamizawa, “HAPTIC PLASTeR: soft, thin, light and flexible haptic display using DEA composed of slide-ring material for daily life,” in ACM SIGGRAPH 2019 Emerging Technologies , ser. SIGGRAPH ’19. New York, NY , USA: ...

    2019 doi

  69. [77]

    Representation, space and Hollywood Squares: looking at things that aren’t there anymore,

    D. C. Richardson and M. J. Spivey, “Representation, space and Hollywood Squares: looking at things that aren’t there anymore,” Cognition, vol. 76, no. 3, pp. 269–295, Sep. 2000. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010027700000846

    2000

  70. [78]

    Memory activation and the availability of explanations in sequential diagnostic reasoning

    K. Mehlhorn, N. A. Taatgen, C. Lebiere, and J. F. Krems, “Memory activation and the availability of explanations in sequential diagnostic reasoning.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 1391–1411, 2011. [Online]. Available: ...

    2011 doi

  71. [79]

    Eye movements reveal memory processes during similarity- and rule-based decision making,

    A. Scholz, B. von Helversen, and J. Rieskamp, “Eye movements reveal memory processes during similarity- and rule-based decision making,” Cognition, vol. 136, pp. 228–246, Mar. 2015. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S001002771400239X

    2015

  72. [80]

    Brain activity and medical diagnosis: an EEG study,

    L. M. Ribas, F. T. Rocha, N. R. S. Ortega, A. F. da Rocha, and E. Massad, “Brain activity and medical diagnosis: an EEG study,” BMC Neuroscience, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 109, Oct. 2013. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-14-109

    2013 doi

  73. [81]

    Functional neuroimaging correlates of thinking flexibility and knowledge structure in memory: Exploring the relationships between clinical reasoning and diagnostic thinking,

    S. J. Durning, M. E. Costanzo, T. J. Beckman, A. R. Artino, M. J. Roy, C. van der Vleuten, E. S. Holmboe, R. S. Lipner, and L. Schuwirth, “Functional neuroimaging correlates of thinking flexibility and knowledge structure in memory: Exploring the relationships between clinical...

    2016 doi

  74. [82]

    The Midas Touch: The Effects of Interpersonal Touch on Restaurant Tipping,

    A. H. Crusco and C. G. Wetzel, “The Midas Touch: The Effects of Interpersonal Touch on Restaurant Tipping,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin , vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 512–517, Dec. 1984, publisher: SAGE Publications Inc. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1177/01461...

    1984 doi

  75. [83]

    Individual differences in affective touch: Behavioral inhibition and gender define how an interpersonal touch is perceived,

    V . J. Harjunen, M. Spap ´e, I. Ahmed, G. Jacucci, and N. Ravaja, “Individual differences in affective touch: Behavioral inhibition and gender define how an interpersonal touch is perceived,” Personality and Individual Differences , vol. 107, pp. 88–95, Mar. 2017. [Online]. Av...

    2017

  76. [84]

    Perceptions of visual and multimodal symbolic mediated social touch: Role of technology modality, relationship, and task emotional salience,

    S. Yarosh, X. Wang, and Y . Yao, “Perceptions of visual and multimodal symbolic mediated social touch: Role of technology modality, relationship, and task emotional salience,” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies , vol. 159, p. 102757, Mar. 2022. [Online]. Available...

    2022

  77. [85]

    Social touch in virtual reality,

    A. Gallace and M. Girondini, “Social touch in virtual reality,” Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences , vol. 43, pp. 249–254, Feb. 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ S2352154621001984

    2022

Pith tools

Reviewed May 23, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.