pith. sign in

arxiv: 2407.06527 · v3 · pith:EMBGMLOVnew · submitted 2024-07-09 · ⚛️ physics.med-ph

Low-dose, high-resolution CT of infant-sized lungs via propagation-based phase contrast

James A. Pollock , Kaye Morgan , Linda C. P. Croton , Emily J. Pryor , Kelly J. Crossley , Christopher J. Hall , Daniel Hausermann , Anton Maksimenko
show 2 more authors
Stuart B. Hooper Marcus J. Kitchen
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 23:23 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.med-ph
keywords phase contrast CTlow-dose imaginglung CTphase retrievalpediatric imagingpropagation-based imagingsynchrotroninfant lungs
0
0 comments X

The pith

Propagation-based phase contrast CT with phase retrieval visualizes minor airways in infant-sized lungs at doses over 1,000 times lower than conventional CT at 75 micrometer voxels.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper demonstrates that propagation-based phase-contrast X-ray CT on lamb lungs, used as a model for infant lungs, can produce high-resolution images of small airways by exploiting phase shifts at air-tissue interfaces rather than relying solely on absorption. Phase retrieval applied after beam propagation recovers usable information even when raw projections contain many pixels with zero photon counts, allowing doses far below standard CT levels while meeting safety guidelines. A sympathetic reader would care because repeated high-resolution lung scans are needed for pediatric disease diagnosis, and lowering radiation exposure could reduce long-term risks to young patients. The authors optimize beam energy and propagation distance to maximize image quality per unit dose and push the technique to the quantum limit.

Core claim

Using monochromatic synchrotron radiation and a photon-counting detector, propagation-based phase-contrast CT on static lamb lungs achieved visualization of minor airways at doses 1,225 ± 31% times lower than conventional reconstruction at 75 μm voxels, with phase retrieval recovering information from projections with many zero-count pixels while complying with <2.5 mSv effective dose guidelines for infant chest CT.

What carries the argument

Propagation-based phase-contrast imaging with phase retrieval, where the beam propagates after the sample to turn phase gradients at lung-air interfaces into intensity variations that are then recovered into a phase map.

If this is right

  • Clear visualization of minor lung airways is possible at voxel sizes of 75 μm while staying under current Australian infant chest CT dose limits.
  • Phase retrieval compensates for severe information loss from zero-photon pixels in raw projections.
  • Image quality normalized to dose can be optimized by choice of beam energy and propagation distance.
  • Lamb lungs serve as a practical large-animal proxy for testing pediatric imaging protocols.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If adapted to polychromatic clinical sources, the approach could lower radiation in routine pediatric lung scans.
  • Motion in live infants would likely require gating or faster acquisition not demonstrated in the static scans.
  • The same propagation and retrieval steps might extend to other soft-tissue interfaces with strong phase contrast.

Load-bearing premise

That static lamb lung anatomy scanned under synchrotron conditions will accurately represent the challenges of imaging moving infant human lungs on clinical systems without new artifacts.

What would settle it

A side-by-side low-dose scan of a moving infant lung phantom on a clinical system that either resolves or fails to resolve minor airways at the claimed dose reduction factor without motion-induced artifacts.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2407.06527 by Anton Maksimenko, Christopher J. Hall, Daniel Hausermann, Emily J. Pryor, James A. Pollock, Kaye Morgan, Kelly J. Crossley, Linda C. P. Croton, Marcus J. Kitchen, Stuart B. Hooper.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Phase contrast effects on CT slices demonstrated us [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FRCor trends of phase contrast CTs, focusing on the smallest length scales (note that the full dataset extends to a length scale of 60 mm). All trends were recorded at 45 keV and propagation distances of 1, 2, 4, and 6m, demonstrating in￾creasing correlation due to phase contrast that plateaus beyond 4m. Vertical dashed lines denote the intersections between the FRCor trends and the half-bit threshold used… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Demonstration of the Geant4 dosimetry simulation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Trends comparing the effect of phase retrieval on [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Energy optimisation of image quality according to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Log scale figure of merit graphs comparing low [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Example CT slices recorded with a 4 m propagation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Histogram of the raw data counts recorded through [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Example CT slices recorded with a 4m propagation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_9.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Many lung diseases require detailed visualisation for accurate diagnosis and treatment. High-resolution computed tomography (CT) is the gold-standard technique for non-invasive lung disease detection, but it presents a risk to the patient through the relatively high ionising radiation dose required. Utilising the X-ray phase information may allow improvements in image resolution at equal or lower radiation levels than current clinical imaging. Propagation-based phase-contrast imaging requires minimal adaption of existing medical systems, and is well suited to lung imaging due to the strong phase gradients introduced by the lung-air material interfaces. Herein, propagation-based phase contrast CT is demonstrated for large animals, namely lambs, as a model for paediatric patients, using monochromatic radiation and a photon-counting detector at the Imaging and Medical Beamline of the Australian Synchrotron. Image quality, normalised against radiation dose, was optimised as a function of the beam energy and propagation distance, with the optimal conditions used to test the available image quality at very low radiation dose. The resulting CT images demonstrate superior resolution to existing high-resolution CT systems, pushing dose to the quantum limit to comply with current Australian guidelines for infant chest CT exposure of $<2.5\:\text{mSv}$ effective dose. Constituent raw projections are shown to have significant proportions of pixels with zero photon counts that would create severe information loss in conventional CT. Phase retrieval enabled clear visualisation of minor lung airways at doses up to 1,225$\pm$31\% times lower than conventional CT reconstruction, at a voxel size of just 75$\mathrm{\mu}$m.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports an experimental demonstration of propagation-based phase-contrast CT on lamb lungs (as a model for infant-sized lungs) at the Australian Synchrotron using monochromatic radiation and a photon-counting detector. Image quality is optimized versus beam energy and propagation distance; at the optimum, phase retrieval permits visualization of minor airways at 75 μm voxels while achieving effective doses below 2.5 mSv. The central quantitative claim is that phase retrieval enables this visualization at doses up to 1,225 ± 31 % lower than conventional CT reconstruction, with raw projections containing substantial zero-photon pixels.

Significance. If the reported dose-reduction factor and image-quality metrics are robust, the work would represent a meaningful advance in low-dose, high-resolution lung CT for pediatric applications. The experimental use of a photon-counting detector and explicit handling of the quantum limit constitute clear technical strengths. The static, ex-vivo or anesthetized-lamb setting, however, leaves open questions about translation to moving, in-vivo human infant scans.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim of a 1,225 ± 31 % dose reduction is presented without any error-propagation analysis, without a description of how the conventional-CT reference dose was obtained on the same specimens, and without quantification of the effect of zero-photon pixels on the final SNR or airway-visibility metrics after phase retrieval.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract / Discussion: no direct side-by-side conventional-CT data acquired on the identical lamb lungs are shown, so the numerical dose-reduction factor rests on an external or simulated reference rather than a matched-pair comparison; this weakens the load-bearing quantitative claim.
  3. [Abstract] Abstract: the manuscript does not examine or discuss respiratory-motion effects. Because the central claim is framed as relevant to infant lung imaging, the absence of any test or mitigation strategy for motion-induced blurring or streaking at the reported extreme dose reductions is a load-bearing omission for clinical relevance.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the dose-reduction notation “1,225±31%” mixes a thousands separator with the uncertainty; standard scientific notation (1225 ± 31 %) would improve clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive and detailed review. We address each major comment below, clarifying the methods used and outlining revisions to strengthen the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim of a 1,225 ± 31 % dose reduction is presented without any error-propagation analysis, without a description of how the conventional-CT reference dose was obtained on the same specimens, and without quantification of the effect of zero-photon pixels on the final SNR or airway-visibility metrics after phase retrieval.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract requires supporting details for the quantitative claim. The conventional reference dose was obtained by processing the identical raw projections from the same lamb specimens without phase retrieval, scaling the photon fluence to the level needed for equivalent SNR in a conventional reconstruction (based on the measured zero-photon pixel statistics and Poisson noise model). We will add an explicit description of this calculation in the Methods, include full error-propagation analysis for the reported factor, and quantify the post-retrieval SNR and airway-visibility improvements attributable to phase retrieval despite zero-photon pixels. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract / Discussion: no direct side-by-side conventional-CT data acquired on the identical lamb lungs are shown, so the numerical dose-reduction factor rests on an external or simulated reference rather than a matched-pair comparison; this weakens the load-bearing quantitative claim.

    Authors: The dose-reduction factor derives from a matched comparison on the identical projection datasets acquired from the same specimens: one path applies phase retrieval before reconstruction, while the conventional path uses the same data without retrieval but with fluence scaled to match SNR. No separate conventional scan was performed because the synchrotron experiment was configured for propagation-based imaging; however, the reference is internal to the experimental data rather than external or purely simulated. We will revise the Discussion to explicitly describe this matched-projection methodology and its assumptions. revision: partial

  3. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the manuscript does not examine or discuss respiratory-motion effects. Because the central claim is framed as relevant to infant lung imaging, the absence of any test or mitigation strategy for motion-induced blurring or streaking at the reported extreme dose reductions is a load-bearing omission for clinical relevance.

    Authors: Our study used static excised and anesthetized lamb lungs to demonstrate the achievable resolution and dose reduction at the quantum limit. We will add a dedicated paragraph in the Discussion acknowledging respiratory motion as a key translational challenge for in-vivo infant imaging and outlining potential mitigation approaches, including prospective gating, faster frame rates enabled by high-flux synchrotron beams, and post-processing motion-correction algorithms already validated in clinical CT. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: purely experimental demonstration with measured outputs

full rationale

The paper reports an experimental synchrotron study on static lamb lungs using propagation-based phase contrast CT. Key results (dose reduction factors, airway visualization at 75 μm voxels) are direct measurements from acquired projections and reconstructions, with optimization of energy and propagation distance performed empirically. No derivation chain, equations, or predictions are presented that reduce to fitted inputs or self-citations by construction. The work is self-contained against external benchmarks via direct comparison to conventional CT on the same samples.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard X-ray wave propagation and phase retrieval being sufficient to recover information from sparse photon data in lung tissue; no new free parameters, axioms beyond standard physics, or invented entities are introduced.

axioms (1)
  • standard math Standard X-ray propagation physics and phase retrieval algorithms apply without modification to lung-air interfaces at the tested energies and distances.
    Invoked to convert propagation images into high-contrast CT volumes at low photon counts.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5851 in / 1249 out tokens · 22524 ms · 2026-05-23T23:23:02.269808+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

49 extracted references · 49 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    CT dose reduction factors in the thousands using X-ray phase contrast,

    M. J. Kitchen, G. A. Buckley, T. E. Gureyev, M. J. Wal- lace, N. Andres-Thio, K. Uesugi, N. Yagi, and S. B. Hooper, “CT dose reduction factors in the thousands using X-ray phase contrast,” Scientific Reports, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 15953, Nov. 2017

    work page 2017

  2. [2]

    High resolution propagation-based lung imaging at clinically relevant X- ray dose levels,

    J. Albers, W. L. Wagner, M. O. Fiedler, A. Rother- mel, F. W¨unnemann, F. Di Lillo, D. Dreossi, N. Sodini, E. Baratella, M. Confalonieri, F. Arfelli, A. Kalenka, J. Lotz, J. Biederer, M. O. Wielp ¨utz, H.-U. Kauczor, F. Alves, G. Tromba, and C. Dullin, “High resolution propagation-based lung imaging at clinically relevant X- ray dose levels,” Scientific R...

    work page 2023

  3. [3]

    X-ray Phase-Contrast Computed Tomog- raphy for Soft Tissue Imaging at the Imaging and Med- ical Beamline (IMBL) of the Australian Synchrotron,

    B. D. Arhatari, A. W. Stevenson, B. Abbey, Y . I. Nesterets, A. Maksimenko, C. J. Hall, D. Thompson, S. C. Mayo, T. Fiala, H. M. Quiney, S. T. Taba, S. J. Lewis, P. C. Brennan, M. Dimmock, D. H¨ausermann, and T. E. Gureyev, “X-ray Phase-Contrast Computed Tomog- raphy for Soft Tissue Imaging at the Imaging and Med- ical Beamline (IMBL) of the Australian Sy...

    work page 2021

  4. [4]

    Simultaneous phase and amplitude extraction from a single defocused image of a homoge- neous object,

    D. Paganin, S. C. Mayo, T. E. Gureyev, P. R. Miller, and S. W. Wilkins, “Simultaneous phase and amplitude extraction from a single defocused image of a homoge- neous object,”Journal of Microscopy, vol. 206, no. 1, pp. 33–40, 2002

    work page 2002

  5. [5]

    A calibration CT mini- lung-phantom created by 3-D printing and subtractive manufacturing,

    H. H. Guo, M. Persson, O. Weinheimer, J. Rosenberg, T. E. Robinson, and J. Wang, “A calibration CT mini- lung-phantom created by 3-D printing and subtractive manufacturing,” Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 183–190, Jun. 2021

    work page 2021

  6. [6]

    Mortality and risk factors for surgical lung biopsy in patients with id- iopathic interstitial pneumonia,

    J. H. Park, D. K. Kim, D. S. Kim, Y . Koh, S.-D. Lee, W. S. Kim, W. D. Kim, and S. I. Park, “Mortality and risk factors for surgical lung biopsy in patients with id- iopathic interstitial pneumonia,” European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery: Official Journal of the Euro- pean Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery , vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 1115–1119, Jun. 2007

    work page 2007

  7. [7]

    Bronchoscopy and needle biopsy techniques for di- agnosis and staging of lung cancer,

    P. Mazzone, P. Jain, A. C. Arroliga, and R. A. Matthay, “Bronchoscopy and needle biopsy techniques for di- agnosis and staging of lung cancer,” Clinics in Chest Medicine, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 137–158, ix, Mar. 2002

    work page 2002

  8. [8]

    Investigation of the imaging quality of synchrotron- based phase-contrast mammographic tomography,

    T. E. Gureyev, S. C. Mayo, Y . I. Nesterets, S. Moham- madi, D. Lockie, R. H. Menk, F. Arfelli, K. M. Pavlov, M. J. Kitchen, F. Zanconati, C. Dullin, and G. Tromba, “Investigation of the imaging quality of synchrotron- based phase-contrast mammographic tomography,”Jour- nal of Physics D: Applied Physics , vol. 47, no. 36, p. 365401, Aug. 2014, publisher: ...

    work page 2014

  9. [9]

    A feasibil- ity study of X-ray phase-contrast mammographic tomog- raphy at the Imaging and Medical beamline of the Aus- tralian Synchrotron,

    Y . I. Nesterets, T. E. Gureyev, S. C. Mayo, A. W. Steven- son, D. Thompson, J. M. C. Brown, M. J. Kitchen, K. M. Pavlov, D. Lockie, F. Brun, and G. Tromba, “A feasibil- ity study of X-ray phase-contrast mammographic tomog- raphy at the Imaging and Medical beamline of the Aus- tralian Synchrotron,” Journal of Synchrotron Radiation, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 150...

    work page 2015

  10. [10]

    Experimental optimization of the energy for breast-CT with synchrotron radiation,

    P. Oliva, V . Di Trapani, F. Arfelli, L. Brombal, S. Donato, B. Golosio, R. Longo, G. Mettivier, L. Rigon, A. Taibi, G. Tromba, F. Zanconati, and P. Delogu, “Experimental optimization of the energy for breast-CT with synchrotron radiation,” Scientific Reports, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 17430, Oct. 2020, publisher: Nature Publishing Group. [Online]. Available: ht...

    work page 2020

  11. [11]

    Effect of x-ray energy on the radiological image quality in propagation-based phase-contrast computed tomogra- phy of the breast,

    S. Wan, B. D. Arhatari, Y . I. Nesterets, S. C. Mayo, D. Thompson, J. Fox, B. Kumar, Z. Prodanovic, D. Hausermann, A. Maksimenko, C. Hall, M. Dimmock, K. M. Pavlov, D. Lockie, M. Rickard, Z. Gadomkar, A. Aminzadeh, E. Vafa, A. Peele, H. M. Quiney, S. Lewis, T. E. Gureyev, P. C. Brennan, and S. T. Taba, “Effect of x-ray energy on the radiological image qua...

    work page 2021

  12. [12]

    Propagation-based phase-contrast imaging of the breast: image quality and the effect of X-ray energy and radiation dose,

    I. Gunaseelan, A. Amin Zadeh, B. Arhatari, A. Mak- simenko, C. Hall, D. Hausermann, B. Kumar, J. Fox, H. Quiney, D. Lockie, S. Lewis, P. Brennan, T. Gureyev, and S. Tavakoli Taba, “Propagation-based phase-contrast imaging of the breast: image quality and the effect of X-ray energy and radiation dose,” The British Journal of Radiology, vol. 96, no. 1150, p...

    work page 2023

  13. [13]

    Image quality comparison between a phase-contrast synchrotron radiation breast CT and a clinical breast CT: a phantom based study,

    L. Brombal, F. Arfelli, P. Delogu, S. Donato, G. Met- tivier, K. Michielsen, P. Oliva, A. Taibi, I. Sechopoulos, R. Longo, and C. Fedon, “Image quality comparison between a phase-contrast synchrotron radiation breast CT and a clinical breast CT: a phantom based study,” Scientific Reports, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 17778, Nov. 2019, publisher: Nature Publishing Gr...

    work page 2019

  14. [14]

    Framework to op- timize fixed-length micro-CT systems for propagation- based phase-contrast imaging,

    G. Lioliou, I. Buchanan, A. Astolfo, M. Endrizzi, D. Bate, C. K. Hagen, and A. Olivo, “Framework to op- timize fixed-length micro-CT systems for propagation- based phase-contrast imaging,” Optics Express, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 4839–4856, Feb. 2024, publisher: Optica Pub- lishing Group

    work page 2024

  15. [15]

    In situ phase contrast X-ray brain CT,

    L. C. P. Croton, K. S. Morgan, D. M. Paganin, L. T. Kerr, M. J. Wallace, K. J. Crossley, S. L. Miller, N. Yagi, K. Uesugi, S. B. Hooper, and M. J. Kitchen, “In situ phase contrast X-ray brain CT,”Scientific Reports, vol. 8, 10 Low-dose, high-resolution CT of infant-sized lungs via propagation-based phase contrast no. 1, p. 11412, Jul. 2018, number: 1 Publ...

    work page 2018

  16. [16]

    Interface- specific x-ray phase retrieval tomography of complex biological organs,

    M. A. Beltran, D. M. Paganin, K. K. W. Siu, A. Fouras, S. B. Hooper, D. H. Reser, and M. J. Kitchen, “Interface- specific x-ray phase retrieval tomography of complex biological organs,” Physics in Medicine and Biology , vol. 56, no. 23, pp. 7353–7369, Nov. 2011, publisher: IOP Publishing

    work page 2011

  17. [17]

    2D and 3D X-ray phase retrieval of multi- material objects using a single defocus distance,

    M. A. Beltran, D. M. Paganin, K. Uesugi, and M. J. Kitchen, “2D and 3D X-ray phase retrieval of multi- material objects using a single defocus distance,” Optics Express, vol. 18, no. 7, pp. 6423–6436, Mar. 2010, pub- lisher: Optica Publishing Group

    work page 2010

  18. [18]

    Correcting multi mate- rial artifacts from single material phase retrieved holo- tomograms with a simple 3D Fourier method,

    M. Ullherr and S. Zabler, “Correcting multi mate- rial artifacts from single material phase retrieved holo- tomograms with a simple 3D Fourier method,” Optics Express, vol. 23, no. 25, pp. 32 718–32 727, Dec. 2015, publisher: Optica Publishing Group

    work page 2015

  19. [19]

    Imaging the Brain In Situ with Phase Contrast CT,

    L. Croton, K. Morgan, D. Paganin, L. Kerr, M. Wallace, K. Crossley, G. Ruben, S. Miller, N. Yagi, K. Uesugi, S. Hooper, and M. Kitchen, “Imaging the Brain In Situ with Phase Contrast CT,” Microscopy and Microanaly- sis, vol. 24, no. S2, pp. 352–353, Aug. 2018, publisher: Cambridge University Press

    work page 2018

  20. [20]

    Live small-animal X-ray lung ve- locimetry and lung micro-tomography at the Australian Synchrotron Imaging and Medical Beamline,

    R. P. Murrie, K. S. Morgan, A. Maksimenko, A. Fouras, D. M. Paganin, C. Hall, K. K. W. Siu, D. W. Parsons, and M. Donnelley, “Live small-animal X-ray lung ve- locimetry and lung micro-tomography at the Australian Synchrotron Imaging and Medical Beamline,” Journal of Synchrotron Radiation, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 1049–1055, Jul. 2015

    work page 2015

  21. [21]

    Synchrotron inline phase contrast µCT enables detailed virtual histology of embedded soft-tissue samples with and without staining,

    M. Saccomano, J. Albers, G. Tromba, M. Dobrivo- jevi´c Radmilovi ´c, S. Gajovi ´c, F. Alves, and C. Dullin, “Synchrotron inline phase contrast µCT enables detailed virtual histology of embedded soft-tissue samples with and without staining,”Journal of Synchrotron Radiation, vol. 25, no. Pt 4, pp. 1153–1161, Jul. 2018

    work page 2018

  22. [22]

    Refraction-enhanced x-ray imaging of mouse lung using synchrotron radiation source,

    N. Yagi, Y . Suzuki, K. Umetani, Y . Kohmura, and K. Yamasaki, “Refraction-enhanced x-ray imaging of mouse lung using synchrotron radiation source,” Medi- cal Physics, vol. 26, no. 10, pp. 2190–2193, Oct. 1999

    work page 1999

  23. [23]

    Respiratory transition in the newborn: a three- phase process,

    S. B. Hooper, A. B. t. Pas, and M. J. Kitchen, “Respiratory transition in the newborn: a three- phase process,” Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition , vol. 101, no. 3, pp. F266–F271, May 2016, publisher: BMJ Publishing Group Section: Review. [Online]. Available: https: //fn.bmj.com/content/101/3/F266

    work page 2016

  24. [24]

    Small angle x-ray scattering with edge-illumination,

    P. Modregger, T. P. Cremona, C. Benarafa, J. C. Schittny, A. Olivo, and M. Endrizzi, “Small angle x-ray scattering with edge-illumination,” Scientific Reports, vol. 6, no. 1, p. 30940, Aug. 2016, number: 1 Publisher: Nature Pub- lishing Group

    work page 2016

  25. [25]

    Emphysema quantified: mapping regional airway dimensions using 2D phase contrast X-ray imaging,

    M. J. Kitchen, G. A. Buckley, L. T. Kerr, K. L. Lee, K. Uesugi, N. Yagi, and S. B. Hooper, “Emphysema quantified: mapping regional airway dimensions using 2D phase contrast X-ray imaging,” Biomedical Optics Express, vol. 11, no. 8, pp. 4176–4190, Aug. 2020, pub- lisher: Optica Publishing Group

    work page 2020

  26. [26]

    Measurement of absolute regional lung air volumes from near-field x-ray speckles,

    A. F. T. Leong, D. M. Paganin, S. B. Hooper, M. L. Siew, and M. J. Kitchen, “Measurement of absolute regional lung air volumes from near-field x-ray speckles,” Optics Express, vol. 21, no. 23, pp. 27 905–27 923, Nov. 2013, publisher: Optica Publishing Group

    work page 2013

  27. [27]

    Low-dose CT for lung cancer screening: position paper from the Italian college of thoracic radiol- ogy,

    M. Silva, G. Picozzi, N. Sverzellati, S. Anglesio, M. Bar- tolucci, E. Cavigli, A. Deliperi, M. Falchini, F. Falaschi, D. Ghio, P. Gollini, A. R. Larici, A. V . Marchian`o, S. Pal- mucci, L. Preda, C. Romei, C. Tessa, C. Rampinelli, and M. Mascalchi, “Low-dose CT for lung cancer screening: position paper from the Italian college of thoracic radiol- ogy,”L...

    work page 2022

  28. [28]

    Early Results From the Implementation of a Lung Cancer Screening Program: The Beaumont Health System Expe- rience,

    T. B. Lanni, C. Stevens, M. Farah, A. Boyer, J. Davis, R. Welsh, D. Keena, A. Akhtar, and D. Mezwa, “Early Results From the Implementation of a Lung Cancer Screening Program: The Beaumont Health System Expe- rience,”American Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 218–222, Mar. 2018

    work page 2018

  29. [29]

    Kauczor, A

    H.-U. Kauczor, A. L. Baert, and K. Sartor, Eds., Func- tional Imaging of the Chest , ser. Medical Radiology. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2004

    work page 2004

  30. [30]

    Restrictions on use of X-ray radiation for tomography in humans,

    E. N. Simonov, “Restrictions on use of X-ray radiation for tomography in humans,” Biomedical Engineering , vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 237–239, Sep. 2004. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10527-005-0006-2

    work page doi:10.1007/s10527-005-0006-2 2004

  31. [31]

    Phase-contrast imaging using poly- chromatic hard X-rays,

    S. W. Wilkins, T. E. Gureyev, D. Gao, A. Pogany, and A. W. Stevenson, “Phase-contrast imaging using poly- chromatic hard X-rays,” Nature, vol. 384, no. 6607, pp. 335–338, Nov. 1996, number: 6607 Publisher: Nature Publishing Group

    work page 1996

  32. [32]

    Photon- counting x-ray detectors for CT,

    M. Danielsson, M. Persson, and M. Sj ¨olin, “Photon- counting x-ray detectors for CT,” Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol. 66, no. 3, p. 03TR01, Jan. 2021

    work page 2021

  33. [33]

    Spatial resolution, signal-to-noise and information capacity of linear imaging systems,

    T. Gureyev, Y . Nesterets, and F. d. Hoog, “Spatial resolution, signal-to-noise and information capacity of linear imaging systems,” Optics Express , vol. 24, no. 15, pp. 17 168–17 182, Jul. 2016, publisher: Optica Publishing Group. [Online]. Available: https: //opg.optica.org/oe/abstract.cfm?uri=oe-24-15-17168

    work page 2016

  34. [34]

    Fourier shell correlation threshold criteria,

    M. van Heel and M. Schatz, “Fourier shell correlation threshold criteria,” Journal of Structural Biology , vol. 151, no. 3, pp. 250–262, Sep. 2005

    work page 2005

  35. [35]

    Char- acterization of a CdTe single-photon-counting detector for biomedical imaging applications,

    L. Fardin, C. Giaccaglia, P. Busca, and A. Bravin, “Char- acterization of a CdTe single-photon-counting detector for biomedical imaging applications,” Physica Medica, vol. 108, p. 102571, Apr. 2023

    work page 2023

  36. [36]

    CT scans for children: Information for referrers | ARPANSA

    “CT scans for children: Information for referrers | ARPANSA.” [Online]. Available: https://www.arpansa.gov.au/understanding-radiation/ radiation-sources/more-radiation-sources/ ct-imaging-and-children-referrers 11 Low-dose, high-resolution CT of infant-sized lungs via propagation-based phase contrast

    work page

  37. [37]

    Estimation of effective doses in pe- diatric X-ray computed tomography examination,

    H. Obara, M. Takahashi, K. Kudou, Y . Mariya, Y . Takai, and I. Kashiwakura, “Estimation of effective doses in pe- diatric X-ray computed tomography examination,” Ex- perimental and Therapeutic Medicine, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 4515–4520, Nov. 2017

    work page 2017

  38. [38]

    Low-Dose Chest CT Proto- cols for Imaging COVID-19 Pneumonia: Technique Pa- rameters and Radiation Dose,

    I. I. Suliman, G. A. Khouqeer, N. A. Ahmed, M. M. Abuzaid, and A. Sulieman, “Low-Dose Chest CT Proto- cols for Imaging COVID-19 Pneumonia: Technique Pa- rameters and Radiation Dose,”Life, vol. 13, no. 4, p. 992, Apr. 2023

    work page 2023

  39. [39]

    Computed Tomography Dose in Paediatric Care: Simple Dose Es- timation Using Dose Length Product Conversion Coef- ficients,

    N. H. M. Tap, M. A. J. Sidek, S. F. M. Ridzwan, S. E. Selvarajah, F. M. Zaki, and H. A. Hamid, “Computed Tomography Dose in Paediatric Care: Simple Dose Es- timation Using Dose Length Product Conversion Coef- ficients,” The Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences : MJMS, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 82–91, Jul. 2018

    work page 2018

  40. [40]

    APPROPRIATE USE OF EFFECTIVE DOSE IN RADIATION PROTECTION AND RISK ASSESSMENT,

    D. R. Fisher and F. H. Fahey, “APPROPRIATE USE OF EFFECTIVE DOSE IN RADIATION PROTECTION AND RISK ASSESSMENT,” Health physics, vol. 113, no. 2, pp. 102–109, Aug. 2017

    work page 2017

  41. [41]

    Influence of CT Image Matrix Size and Kernel Type on the Assessment of HRCT in Patients with SSC-ILD,

    B. D. Balmer, C. Bl ¨uthgen, B. B¨assler, K. Martini, F. A. Huber, L. Ruby, A. Sch¨onenberger, and T. Frauenfelder, “Influence of CT Image Matrix Size and Kernel Type on the Assessment of HRCT in Patients with SSC-ILD,”Di- agnostics, vol. 12, no. 7, p. 1662, Jul. 2022, number: 7 Publisher: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute

    work page 2022

  42. [42]

    High-Resolution Chest CT Imaging of the Lungs: Impact of 1024 Matrix Recon- struction and Photon-Counting-Detector CT,

    D. J. Bartlett, C. W. Koo, B. J. Bartholmai, K. Rajendran, J. M. Weaver, A. F. Halaweish, S. Leng, C. H. McCol- lough, and J. G. Fletcher, “High-Resolution Chest CT Imaging of the Lungs: Impact of 1024 Matrix Recon- struction and Photon-Counting-Detector CT,” Investiga- tive radiology, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 129–137, Mar. 2019

    work page 2019

  43. [43]

    1024-pixel image matrix for chest CT – Impact on image quality of bronchial structures in phantoms and patients,

    A. Euler, K. Martini, B. Baessler, M. Eberhard, F. Schoeck, H. Alkadhi, and T. Frauenfelder, “1024-pixel image matrix for chest CT – Impact on image quality of bronchial structures in phantoms and patients,” PLoS ONE, vol. 15, no. 6, p. e0234644, Jun. 2020

    work page 2020

  44. [44]

    Influence of field of view size on image quality: ultra-high-resolution CT vs. conventional high-resolution CT,

    T. Miyata, M. Yanagawa, A. Hata, O. Honda, Y . Yoshida, N. Kikuchi, M. Tsubamoto, S. Tsukagoshi, A. Uranishi, and N. Tomiyama, “Influence of field of view size on image quality: ultra-high-resolution CT vs. conventional high-resolution CT,”European Radiology, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 3324–3333, Jun. 2020

    work page 2020

  45. [45]

    Ef- fect of Matrix Size on the Image Quality of Ultra-high- resolution CT of the Lung: Comparison of 512 × 512, 1024 × 1024, and 2048 × 2048,

    A. Hata, M. Yanagawa, O. Honda, N. Kikuchi, T. Miy- ata, S. Tsukagoshi, A. Uranishi, and N. Tomiyama, “Ef- fect of Matrix Size on the Image Quality of Ultra-high- resolution CT of the Lung: Comparison of 512 × 512, 1024 × 1024, and 2048 × 2048,” Academic Radiology, vol. 25, no. 7, pp. 869–876, Jul. 2018, publisher: Else- vier

    work page 2048

  46. [46]

    Improved image quality and diag- nostic potential using ultra-high-resolution computed to- mography of the lung with small scan FOV: A prospec- tive study,

    H. Zhu, L. Zhang, Y . Wang, P. Hamal, X. You, H. Mao, F. Li, and X. Sun, “Improved image quality and diag- nostic potential using ultra-high-resolution computed to- mography of the lung with small scan FOV: A prospec- tive study,”PLoS ONE, vol. 12, no. 2, p. e0172688, Feb. 2017

    work page 2017

  47. [47]

    Subjec- tive and objective comparisons of image quality between ultra-high-resolution CT and conventional area detector CT in phantoms and cadaveric human lungs,

    M. Yanagawa, A. Hata, O. Honda, N. Kikuchi, T. Miyata, A. Uranishi, S. Tsukagoshi, and N. Tomiyama, “Subjec- tive and objective comparisons of image quality between ultra-high-resolution CT and conventional area detector CT in phantoms and cadaveric human lungs,” European Radiology, vol. 28, no. 12, pp. 5060–5068, 2018

    work page 2018

  48. [48]

    Quantitative measurement of airway di- mensions using ultra-high resolution computed tomogra- phy,

    N. Tanabe, T. Oguma, S. Sato, T. Kubo, S. Kozawa, H. Shima, K. Koizumi, A. Sato, S. Muro, K. Togashi, and T. Hirai, “Quantitative measurement of airway di- mensions using ultra-high resolution computed tomogra- phy,”Respiratory Investigation, vol. 56, no. 6, pp. 489– 496, Nov. 2018

    work page 2018

  49. [49]

    Agostini, C

    A. Agostini, C. Floridi, A. Borgheresi, M. Badaloni, P. Esposto Pirani, F. Terilli, L. Ottaviani, and A. Gio- vagnoni, “Proposal of a low-dose, long-pitch, dual- source chest CT protocol on third-generation dual-source CT using a tin filter for spectral shaping at 100 kVp for CoronaVirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients: a fea- sibility study,” La Radiolo...

    work page 2019