Pith. sign in

REVIEW

A 'MAP' to find high-performing soft robot designs: Traversing complex design spaces using MAP-elites and Topology Optimization

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2407.07591 v1 pith:JEAQLKZE submitted 2024-07-10 cs.RO cs.NE

classification cs.ROcs.NE
keywords designsoftoptimizationcomplexdesignsfindhigh-performingmethod
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Soft robotics has emerged as the standard solution for grasping deformable objects, and has proven invaluable for mobile robotic exploration in extreme environments. However, despite this growth, there are no widely adopted computational design tools that produce quality, manufacturable designs. To advance beyond the diminishing returns of heuristic bio-inspiration, the field needs efficient tools to explore the complex, non-linear design spaces present in soft robotics, and find novel high-performing designs. In this work, we investigate a hierarchical design optimization methodology which combines the strengths of topology optimization and quality diversity optimization to generate diverse and high-performance soft robots by evolving the design domain. The method embeds variably sized void regions within the design domain and evolves their size and position, to facilitating a richer exploration of the design space and find a diverse set of high-performing soft robots. We demonstrate its efficacy on both benchmark topology optimization problems and soft robotic design problems, and show the method enhances grasp performance when applied to soft grippers. Our method provides a new framework to design parts in complex design domains, both soft and rigid.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools